Justplainbill's Weblog

November 23, 2016

Victor Hanson responds to an Angry Reader, [nc]

Filed under: Political Commentary — justplainbill @ 4:42 pm

November 23, 2016 8:33 am / Leave a Comment / Megan Ring
From an Angry Reader:

The new kind of Republican party is part 1930’s Nazi and 1950’s Dixiecrat.

Raye Harper

——————————
Victor Davis Hanson’s Reply:

Dear Angry Reader Raye Harper,

Since you assert rather than argue or explain, it is hard to fathom what you are getting at. But in the spirit of the Angry Reader, I’ll give it a shot.

There is a reason why etymology is a valuable pursuit. Seek the root meaning of words and thereby learn. Our English word Nazism derives as an English transliterated abbreviation for the German Nationalsozialismus (“National Socialism”)—Hitler’s effort to combine fanatical nationalism with socialist and anti-capitalist principles.

Take also your “Dixiecrat” (which incidentally was a one-time phenomenon of the election of 1948, and did not reappear as you suggest in the “1950s.”) Note the suffix “-crat” (Greek, kratos, “power/rule”). It was so named in 1948 because it was a derivative of the Democratic Party. It was not called the Dixiepublicans because it had no similarities to the Republican Party.

Ironically, Dixiecrats’ official name (“The States’ Rights Democratic Party”) reflected and championed the idea of federal nullification (in this case school integration), which had been the source of the 1828 (in this case tariffs) and 1860 (in this case slavery) secessionist fervors. How odd, then, that 300 liberal jurisdictions currently are now “Sanctuary Cities” (perhaps better described as “Nullification Cities”) that defy federal immigration in the neo-Confederate spirit. Ask yourself which party, in the spirit of the Dixiecrats, is more likely to excuse race-base segregation, where on-campus “theme houses” or “safe spaces” with impunity discriminate on the basis of superficial appearance. Who is more tolerant of the idea of La Raza (“the Race”), a noun whose pedigree is found in Franco’s fascist Spain and Mussolini’s (as Razza) fascist Italy—Democrats or Republicans?

Is there any need to ask further where the impetus of contemporary anti-Semitism originates? Just walk on any contemporary campus, and visit the free-speech area. Being Jewish and pro-Israel is far more likely to incur left-wing anti-Semites than old-fashioned right-wing ones.

In sum, I don’t see how the present pro-capitalist, pro-federalist, pro-Israel Republican Party can derive from either a foreign imported socialism or an indigenous states’ rights Democratic Party.

Finally, most readers are aware of your insidious liberal trope. In 1980 Reagan was called a Nazi. When he left office, newly-elected George H.W. Bush was the next extremist and suddenly the Left nostalgically called Reagan moderate, given that he was out of power. In 2000 George W. Bush was the new Nazi, and his father reinvented as a moderate in comparison. By 2016 a “new” Republican Party under Trump is now supposedly Nazi-like and W. is now seen as sober and judicious. So the playbook is transparent: assassinate the character of your present adversary by claiming he is an extremist by the standard of his predecessors, whom you of course smeared when they were in power as well.

Bottom line: a lot of incoherence in your short sentence.

Sincerely,

VDH

November 21, 2016

Too Cool for School!

Filed under: Humor — justplainbill @ 4:18 pm

https://www.youtube.com/embed/SJoE_lNQdHU”

November 20, 2016

Violent Rioters, Capt John [c]

Filed under: Anti-American Politicians — justplainbill @ 10:21 pm

“Violent Rioters” Who Support Hillary, Voted For The Redistribution of Wealth

By Capt Joseph R. John, November 16, 2016

Obama, Bernie, and Hillary’s support for the redistribution of wealth was support for the primary philosophy “Communism” promotes.

Over 60 million American Patriots, supported “The Free Enterprise System” form of government, and rejected Obama, Bernie, and Hillary’s support for the redistribution of wealth.

Anarchists, Black Lives Matter demonstrators, Progressives, Leftists, the Muslim Brotherhood, and Communists trained by Obama’s Common Core Socialist Curriculum supported the redistribution of wealth and accepted Obama, Bernie, and Hillary’s Socialist philosophy.

Many Americans voted for Hillary, even though over and over again, nonstop, for 4 years, Hillary violated the National Security Laws of the United States by transmitting “thousands” of very highly classified messages on an unclassified server, endangering the lives of Americans and foreign allies. They weren’t bothered by her repeated violation of the National Security of the United States, which endangered the safety of American citizens and the Republic.

For seven days, the American electorate have been witnessing large scale “violent riots” against “Law and Order” in several dozen cities, instigated and organized by George Soros’s Pro-Communist organization “Open Society Foundation”, and by the Marxist Leninist Communist Workers Party’s front, “ANSWER”. “ANSWER” was funded by “Open Society Foundation”, the Communist Party “Progress Unity Fund.”, and Al Sharpton’s “National Action Network.”

The goal of the “violent riots” was to try to make the public believe the majority of Americans were against the election of President Elect Donald Trump, and that he lost the popular vote—nothing was further from the truth. Greg Phillips of VoteFraud.org claims that Trump would have won the election by a huge landslide, if the widespread vote fraud perpetrated during the election had been stamped out ahead of the vote.

After the VoterFraud.org organization extensively analyzed the database of 180 million registered voters, Greg Phillips stated, “We have verified that more than three million votes were cast illegally by non-citizens.” According to current press releases by the left of center liber4al media establishment, Hillary Clinton won the popular vote by around 630,000 votes. Yet approximately 7 million ballots still remain to be counted, 3 million votes were cast illegally by non-citizens, more than 1.8 million dead people were “still” listed as voters, and approximately 2.75 million people were registered to vote in more than one state.
George Soros funded the “violent riots” against “Law and Order” in Ferguson, MO and Baltimore, MD with $33 million. Following the November 8th election, George Soros has been funding “violent riots” in cities like NYC, Portland, LA, Madison, San Francisco, Baltimore, Denver, etc. with $25 million. Those “violent riots” against “Law and Order” are Soros’ attempt to destabilize the new administration of President Elect Donald Trump. George Soros has been continuing to deconstruct the Constitutional Government of the United States.

By supporting the election of Hillary Clinton, who supports the redistribution of wealth philosophy; Soros was hoping to help elect a candidate for president who would agree with his support for the United Nations One World Order, a World Order philosophy supported by the Communists Party, USA. George Soros should be charged with “Seditious Conspiracy” for the damage he has been creating in the United States with his funding of “violent riots”.

The Webster Dictionary defines “Seditious Conspiracy” as: “The crime of saying, writing, or doing something that encourages people to destroy the government.” The Law Dictionary defines “Sedition” as: “The crime of creating a revolt, disaster or violence against lawful civic authority with the intent to cause overthrow or destroy.”

The “violent riots” against “Law and Order” organized by George Soros and the Progressives in dozens of cities following the November 8th election, was also supported by the abusive and biased main stream media. Those “violent riots” were promoted with the hopes that they would spread to thousands of cities across the nation, and would develop into massive national riots.

The hope of the Progressives, Anarchists, Communists, Leftists, Black Lives Matter demonstrators, the Muslim Brotherhood, Soros’s Open Society Foundation, Al Sharpton’s National Action Network, and left of center liberal media establishment was that Obama would react to massive national riots by declaring martial law, and that Obama would lock down the whole country. However, the “violent riots” promoted by intolerant & hypocritical supporters of Hillary campaign, slowly fizzled, and never developed into the massive national riots Soros had hoped for.

The radical organizations listed above are against the peaceful transition of power, outlined in the US Constitution. They have been promoting the burning of American Flags in the street, screaming vulgar obscenities that make Mr Trump comments 11 years ago sound like a Sunday sermon, encouraging the destruction of private property, promoting hate crimes including the unmercifully beating of Trump voters, and recently those violent rioters, in a despicable hate crime, “murdered” a Veteran who tried to prevent “violent rioters” from burning the American Flag (the beating and murder can be viewed in the video in the attachment)

On national television, President Elect Donald J. Trump called for “calm” and for his supporters not to respond to violent rioters, because he said “I will bring this country together.” Yet despite his call for “calm”, 7 days of “violent riots” by anarchists continue, and Twitter has been flooded with threats to assassinate President Elect Donald Trump, and the murder of his family members. Obama, Hillary, and the liberal media establishment have not called for “calm” and the immediate cessation of the “violent rioting”.

There is a difference between peaceful protests like those led by Rev Martin Luther King and Mahatma Gandhi, and the “violent riots” Americans have been witnessing—yet the left of center liberal media establishment are calling the “violent riots promoting sedition”—-“peaceful protests protected by the US Constitution.” There is an obvious double standard in reporting by the liberal press.

If President Elect Trump hadn’t been elected, and his supporters were rioting in the streets, killing a Veteran, the press would not be as compliant as it is now. The press has failed to inform the American people, that half of the “violent rioters” who have been arrested by police, haven’t even voted. The press’ continues in its attempt to mislead the American people—-it has lost all credibility.

Please click on the below listed link to view a “very impressive” commentary by Thaddeus Dionne Alexander, about the “violent rioters” and on the burning of American Flags—the article following this Op Ed will provide you with more information on Thaddeus.

George Soros’ Open Society Foundation will continue to promote rebellion against “Law and Order” as he has done for the last 8 years, and will fund criminal Radical Anarchists, the Communists Party USA, Progressives, the Muslim Brotherhood, the Marxist Leninist Communist Workers Party, Black Lives Matter, and Al Sharpton’s National Action Network.

The left of center liberal media establishment will support Soros’s program to encourage violent unlawful civic riots like the “violent riots” he funded in Ferguson, Baltimore, NYC, LA, Portland, San Francisco, Denver, etc. and to destabilize the US Government.

The battle to combat violent unlawful civic, and to riots protect and defend the US Constitution is far from over.

Copyright by Capt Joseph R. John. All Rights Reserved. The material can only posted on another Web site or distributed on the Internet by giving full credit to the author. It may not be published, broadcast, or rewritten without the permission from the author.

Joseph R. John, USNA ‘62
Capt USN(Ret)/Former FBI
Chairman, Combat Veterans For Congress PAC
2307 Fenton Parkway, Suite 107-184
San Diego, CA 92108

http://www.CombatVeteransForCongress.org

https://www.facebook.com/combatveteransforcongress?ref=hl

Then I heard the voice of the Lord, saying, “Whom shall I send, and who will go for Us?” Then I said, “Here am I. Send me!”
-Isaiah 6:8
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
WND
YOU AIN’T NO SLAVES!’ BLACK VET’S EPIC TAKEDOWN OF ANTI-TRUMP RIOTERS
Monday, November 14th, 2016 by Chelsea Schilling –News & Commentary Editor for WND

A black Air Force veteran, Thaddeus Dionne Alexander, is fed up with anti-Trump rioters who disrespect America’s flag, refuse to say the Pledge of Allegiance, reject their duly-elected president and wreak havoc in U.S. cities, smashing windows, blocking freeways and igniting fires.

In fact, Thaddeus Dionne Alexander is so outraged by the rioters that he posted a video on YouTube and Facebook – and his message is going viral with 20 million views and nearly a million shares on Facebook alone.
“Wow, y’all are protesting? Really? Man, I don’t understand. It’s not Republicans causing all this destruction, you know, burning up the streets, blocking roads and things like that. It’s the liberals,” Alexander begins.
“You know, these are the same people that are against the Second Amendment. Because they want to ‘decrease violence,’ nobody should have guns. The same people that are [pro]-abortion because they want to ‘save lives.’ And you’re causing all this destruction just because your candidate lost.”
But Alexander explains, in America, “You can’t always get your way.”
He continued:
Everybody wants to be politically correct. Quit being crybabies!
Ain’t nothing free! You ain’t no slave!
You don’t get your way, so you act like a 2-year-old, burning up people’s stuff? Destroying the streets, making people late for work?
Man, I’m glad I don’t live in New York City or Washington or Oregon because I would run one of your asses over. You are outrageous, man. You are the exact reason why Donald Trump won the election. Because we’re tired of you crybabies.
You didn’t earn anything. None of you put on a uniform. But you’re quick to disrespect the flag. Not want to say the Pledge of Allegiance. Not want to recognize the Bible. But you want everything.
You didn’t fight for anything. But you want it.
It doesn’t work like that. …
All these people out there that want to protest and burn stuff up, I don’t think the cops should protect them. When people look at the flag and say, ‘That’s not my flag. Donald Trump is not my president,’ then you know what? Obviously this ain’t your damn country! Leave!
Find another flag. Find another president. Go to Mexico. I really don’t care.
But quit tearing up stuff.
Quit causing destruction and preaching peace. Because you’re contradicting yourself.
During a Monday appearance on “Fox & Friends,” Alexander explained that he was astonished at how the left depicted Republicans as angry individuals who hoarded guns and wanted to “kill babies.”
In fact, Clinton-supporting media outlets predicted Republicans would refuse to accept undesirable election results. On Oct. 27, the New York Times warned of violence by Trump supporters and “another Revolutionary War” should Hillary Clinton win the White House.

And after Trump’s Election Day victory, CNN reported Tampa Bay Buccaneers wide receiver Mike Evans refused to stand for the national anthem. “I’m not going to stand for something I don’t believe in,” Evans said, adding that “America’s not right” for electing Trump.
But for all the media warnings, it turns out, anti-Trump rioters are the ones inflicting violence, destruction and mayhem in American cities.
“I just thought it was so hypocritical. It just amazed me how people reacted,” Alexander said.
“We need to preserve this country. We need to stop burning flags. We need to stand for the pledge of allegiance. And we need to be proud of what we have here.”
Alexander concluded, “Being a black man, there is no other country where we’re accepted like we are in the U.S.
“People may think so. I’ve had friend say, ‘We’ll go back to Africa.’ Well, everybody knows if you’re black man, you’re not accepted in Africa. You’re not African. It’s just not going to work like that. This is the only place where you can be openly gay or homosexual. There’s nowhere else to go.”

[Note: as posted elsewhere on this blog, voter fraud is very real. It is predominantly on the left, and its purpose is to destroy the United States of America. At this point, I would normally restate my position that the Red States should secede. However, if you look at the map and paint the Trump Counties in Red and the Clinton Counties in Blue, the cultural secession has already occurred. As to the riots not being national enough to allow Obama to declare a national emergency and a domestic dictatorship, look back at the counties map, and you will see that only in those few blue areas could he succeed and such rioting is obviously not national in nature.

God Bless America!]

November 18, 2016

News You’re Not Getting Elsewhere 18 Nov 16

Filed under: Political Commentary — justplainbill @ 4:18 pm

Storm-tossed: Haiti
Elections in the poorest country in the Americas are invariably fraught. And in the aftermath of last month’s Hurricane Matthew, the presidential vote on Sunday promises to be as tricky as any. It is a repeat of an election held in October 2015 that was aborted after widespread protests. But with homes destroyed and food scarce, many people have priorities other than voting. This could compromise the legitimacy of the first-round poll (a run-off is scheduled for January) and provide an excuse for losing candidates to protest once again. Whoever prevails, the new president’s priority will be to lead the response to the hurricane, which has affected nearly a fifth of the population. Storm-related losses have been put at $2bn; most of the farms and fisheries in the south-west, the main sources of regional economic activity, have been destroyed; and suspected cholera cases have surged. These are not problems for a caretaker president: Haiti desperately needs stable leadership.

Yellow v red: Malaysia
Thousands of people in yellow shirts will gather in Kuala Lumpur tomorrow to protest against corruption and impunity. The government of Najib Razak, the prime minister, has yet to prosecute anyone in connection with allegations of wrongdoing at 1MDB, a state investment firm from which billions of dollars are thought to have gone missing. A court this week instead handed an 18-month jail term to an opposition lawmaker accused of leaking classified information about the affair. The rally in the capital is the fifth to be organised by Bersih, a coalition calling for electoral reform. A similar event last year passed off peacefully—despite dire warnings from authorities—but without much immediate impact on the country’s stultified politics. This year gangs of red-shirted government supporters have sought to impede a roadshow put on to promote the march, and may try to make trouble at the weekend. Either way, the protesters are already seeing red.

Final countdown: Congolese politics
Residents of Kinshasa, the capital, will be preparing for a weekend hiding indoors. Tomorrow marks one month before the end of Joseph Kabila’s second—and supposedly final—term as president, under the constitution he helped to write. Yet he seems determined to stay in power. Protesters led by Etienne Tshisekedi, an ageing populist, have promised to try to stop him. Yesterday, Mr Kabila’s prime minister was replaced by a minor opposition figure as part of a power-sharing deal that would allow the president to stay in office until 2018. The main opposition called it “a useless provocation”, refusing to accept the deal. Mr Tshisekedi’s alliance, “Le Rassemblement”, remains strong. The question is whether its supporters will be put off by a government ban on protests, and memories of September, when 50-plus protesters at an authorised rally were gunned down by police. If people don’t take to the streets, Mr Kabila will be emboldened.

A perfect excuse to cry: APEC
The Asia-Pacific Economic Co-operation meeting this weekend in Peru, with corporate and national leaders from 21 Pacific Rim countries, will be gloomy. The Trans-Pacific Partnership would have drawn 12 Pacific countries into the biggest regional free-trade pact ever. It would have prompted Japan to open some coddled industries to foreign competition and Vietnam to reform its inefficient state-owned firms, allowed America to set the economic rules for much of developing Asia and given sluggish global trade a fillip. But faced with an incoming president who dislikes free trade, the White House has given it up for dead. Bilateral agreements may partly fill the void, and the other 11 countries may crack on without America; RCEP, a smaller agreement among China, India, Japan and some South-East Asian countries, is near completion. Attendees will be wondering what the world will look like as America, having soured on globalisation, turns inward. They aren’t the only ones.

Will we always have Paris? Climate talks
The Paris Agreement, adopted at the last UN climate meeting a year ago, entered into force before delegations even arrived for this year’s get-together in early November. That ensured a cheery start to proceedings in Marrakech, which conclude this weekend. But that joy gave way to despair when Donald Trump was elected. He wants to stall American efforts to keep global warming to “well below” 2°C, as the Paris deal requires. Mitigation and adaptation efforts, an important topic at the talks, will prove even trickier to fund as a result. Greens insist Mr Trump will galvanise greater action. The latest estimates from the International Energy Agency suggest that’s needed anyway: coal use by 2040 will be more than double the level that would give humanity an odds-on shot at limiting warming to just 2°C. Demand for the stuff, not just growth in demand for the stuff, must fall. Mr Trump disagrees; markets may not.

The world in brief

Shinzo Abe, Japan’s prime minister, called Donald Trump a “leader we can trust” after their meeting in New York, Mr Trump’s first with a foreign counterpart. If that was reassuring, Mr Trump’s reported choice of national security adviser was less so: General Michael Flynn was a decorated intelligence officer but has recently stirred controversy with strident rhetoric about waging war against radical Islam.

The International Atomic Energy Agency publicly warned Iran that it had endangered international support for its nuclear deal by twice producing more than the permissible amount of heavy water, a nuclear-reactor material. The UN nuclear watchdog’s head, Yukiya Amano, denied the warning was related to the election of Donald Trump, a vocal opponent of the deal.

As part of an ever-widening corruption probe in Brazil, police arrested a former governor of Rio de Janeiro state. Sergio Cabral is alleged to have led an operation that netted more than 224m reais ($66m) in construction-related bribes. Unrest over corruption and budget cuts has spread; on Wednesday right-wing protesters stormed the lower legislative house, demanding a military coup.

After the opprobrium, the overhaul. As Volkswagen grapples with a diesel-emissions scandal, the German carmaker announced a major restructuring, including shedding up to 30,000 jobs over five years. The aim is to buff up the core VW brand, doubling its return on sales to 4%—helping to offset the €18bn ($19bn) in scandal-related costs it has incurred so far.

American federal prosecutors filed criminal charges against and arrested a former executive of Valeant, a beleaguered Canadian drug company, and the ex-boss of Philidor, a mail-order pharmacy, over suspected fraud and payment of kickbacks. Investigators have been looking into whether the two companies bilked investors by concealing an arrangement in which Philidor was used to boost Valeant’s sales.

JPMorgan Chase agreed to pay $264m to American authorities to settle criminal and civil probes into whether its hiring practices in China broke foreign-bribery laws. Investigators spent more than three years looking into suspicions that the bank had offered jobs to “princelings”—young relatives of senior Chinese officials—in return for business from state-run companies. Several other banks are also under investigation.

Amid signs of growing economic strength, Federal Reserve chair Janet Yellen said an interest-rate rise could come “relatively soon”; most pundits expect it in December. Earlier, the Bank of Japan, concerned about rising bond yields, surprised markets by offering to buy an unlimited amount of Japanese government bonds. The BoJ wants to keep ten-year yields at around 0%.

C4iSR: Air
USAF to study future command-and-control requirements
Gareth Jennings, London – IHS Jane’s Defence Weekly
17 November 2016
The US Air Force (USAF) is to shortly begin work on a study to asses its command-and-control (C2) capability requirements out to 2030 and beyond, an official said on 16 November.
Speaking under the Chatham House rule, the official said that the study would be similar in scope to the service’s air superiority study that was concluded earlier this year.
“We looked out to 2030 and beyond for our future air superiority needs, and came up with a lot of good ideas and thoughts. Command-and-control will be the next study in which we will look at what are the next capabilities that we need to expand upon. We will be looking to glean as much information [as the USAF’s future C2 requirements] as is humanly possible,” he said.
According to the official, C2 is becoming increasingly important given the need to reduce and even eliminate collateral damage in the age of social media. “Near-precision is a thing of the past,” he said, adding, “[Eliminating] collateral damage is extremely important, and it is something that we need to do even in a denied [defended] environment.”
The USAF fields a number of aircraft types that are traditionally associated with C2, including the Boeing E-3 Airborne Warning And Control System (AWACS) and E-4B, but as the official noted, the service’s latest-generation combat platforms will greatly add to the C2 mix in the coming years.
“The F-22, F-35, and B-21 are going to be hoovers of information, and will bring information dominance,” he said.

EU defence ministers call for pragmatic capability initiatives in 2017
Brooks Tigner, Brussels – IHS Jane’s Defence Weekly
16 November 2016
Aligning national defence planning among European Union countries and extending multinational command arrangements beyond air transport to medical, land, and naval logistics will be explored in early 2017, EU foreign and defence ministers announced after a joint meeting on 14 November.
Calling on the European Defence Agency (EDA) to develop proposals in these areas, they said business cases should be created to ‘replicate the success’ of the multinational European Air Transport Command (EATC) ‘in other domains’. Based in the Dutch city of Eindhoven, the command plans and tasks some 200 transport and air-to-air refuelling aircraft – 75% of Europe’s air transport capacity – on behalf of seven air forces (Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, and Spain).

Country Risk
Argentine, Chilean navies patrol Antarctic waters
Alejandro Sanchez, Washington, DC – IHS Jane’s Defence Weekly
17 November 2016
Argentine and Chilean sea platforms are to monitor the Antarctic from 15 November 2016 to 31 March 2017 under the Joint Antarctic Naval Patrol (Patrulla Antártica Naval Combinada: PANC) framework.
The operation includes search-and-rescue missions, monitoring maritime traffic, potential cleanup activities, and support for Antarctic bases.
Argentina will deploy Islas Malvinas (A 24), one of four Neftegaz-class ships acquired from Russia in 2014. Neftegaz-class ships are classified as Anchor Handling Vessels Tug Supply, weigh 2.7 tonnes, and can travel at 12 kt. Chile is sending Lautaro (ATF 67), a tug/supply vessel constructed in Norway in 1973 and incorporated into the Chilean Navy in 1990, which weighs 1.6 tonnes with a speed of 12 kt.

Air-Launched Weapons
USN plans extended range JSOW test
Richard Scott, London – IHS Jane’s Navy International
17 November 2016
Key Points
• NAVAIR plans a contract award to Raytheon in early 2017 for JSOW ER all-up-round test support
• Scope of work includes adding a production-representative engine/fuel/inlet system, and software modifications to optimise mid-course/endgame performance
The US Navy (USN) is finalising plans to move forward with testing of a powered, extended-range variant of Raytheon’s air-launched AGM-154C-1 Joint Standoff Weapon (JSOW).
In a pre-solicitation notice posted on 8 November, the Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIR) said that the Precision Strike Weapons Program Office (PMA 201) intended to enter into sole-source negotiations with Raytheon Missile Systems for a JSOW Extended Range (JSOW ER) all-up-round (AUR) flight test programme.

Weapons
Syria now operating ‘restored’ S-200 SAMs
Jeremy Binnie, London – IHS Jane’s Defence Weekly
17 November 2016
Syria’s longest range surface-to-air (SAM) systems have been refurbished and are now contributing to the anti-access/area-denial (A2/AD) network in the Eastern Mediterranean region, Russian defence minister Sergei Shoigu said on 15 November.
“We have repaired the Syrian S-200 [air defence] systems over the past four months. They are now effectively protecting Syrian territory, as well as providing air protection for the eastern flank of our Tartus and Humaymim bases,” he said in a joint press conference with President Vladimir Putin.
The Syrian military operates the S-200VE version of the system that has a range of 240 km. Open source satellite imagery shows it had four S-200 operational bases with a total of 10 batteries in 2014.

Air Platforms
India’s indigenous Rustom-II UAV completes maiden flight
Rahul Bedi, New Delhi – IHS Jane’s Defence Weekly
17 November 2016

India’s locally developed Rustom-II MALE UAV completed its maiden test flight near Bangalore on 16 November. Source: DRDO
India’s locally developed Rustom-II medium-altitude long-endurance unmanned aerial vehicle (MALE UAV) completed its maiden test flight at the aeronautical test range in Chitradurga, near Bangalore, on 16 November.
Official sources told IHS Jane’s that the test flight was limited to a 100 km range even though the UAV’s operational range to conduct intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR) missions for all three of India’s services is expected to reach to 250 km.
India’s Ministry of Defence (MoD) said in a statement that the test flight achieved the main objectives of testing the platform’s capabilities such as take-off, banking, level flying, and landing.
Developed by the Aeronautical Development Establishment of India’s Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) and Bharat Electronics Limited, the first prototype of the 1.8-tonne multimission UAV – known as TAPAS 201 – has a 21 m wingspan, a capacity payload of 350 kg, an endurance of over 24 hours, and an operational ceiling of 10,660 m (34,776 feet), according to the MoD.
The public sector Hindustan Aeronautics Limited is also a production partner in the programme.
The MoD said that the Rustom-II/TAPAS 201 is capable of carrying medium- and long-range optic sensors, synthetic aperture radar, electronic intelligence, communication intelligence, and situational awareness payloads for round-the-clock operations.
The UAV is powered by two Russian NPO Saturn 36T turboprop engines rated at 100 hp each. The UAV’s airframe, landing gear, digital flight control, avionic, and navigational systems have all been sourced locally from public and private sector companies.
DRDO officials said the Rustom-II/TAPAS 201 would undertake further trials to validate its design parameters before conducting user trials with the respective services.
The UAV is a derivative of the Rustom-I, which conducted its first test flight in October 2010 and was designed primarily as a test bed for more advanced variants. However, DRDO sources said that the Rustom-I is also expected to enter limited service, possibly with the Indian Navy.

Charlemagne
Iron waffler
Germany and its chancellor are still too hesitant to be able to lead the free world
Nov 19th 2016 | From the print edition


TO VISIT Berlin is to be confronted at every turn by reminders of the evils that Germans do. Memorials to the Holocaust and other wartime atrocities dot the city. In Kreuzberg, a scruffy-but-hip neighbourhood, posters and leaflets denounce milder German iniquities, from urban gentrification to the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), a hated trade deal between the European Union and America that the election of Donald Trump may have killed for good.
Outside Germany, though, Mr Trump’s victory has left disaffected liberals gasping for German benevolence. Brexit, the refugee crisis and the rise of drawbridge-up populists across Europe had already punctured the West’s self-confidence. Now, after an election campaign in which Mr Trump trashed immigrants, vowed to rewrite trade deals and threatened to withdraw America’s security guarantee, the West’s indispensable nation appears to have dispensed with itself. Desperate for a candidate to accept the mantle of leader of the free world, some alighted on Angela Merkel, Germany’s chancellor.
It is easy to see why. Unflappable and patient, dedicated to the freedom she had thrust upon her as a young East German physicist in 1989, Mrs Merkel is a beacon to those who fear the flickering of the liberal flame. She likes markets, trade and good governance. Her commitment to helping refugees fleeing strife in Syria contrasts with the anti-migrant turn elsewhere in Europe. Mr Trump’s victory should extinguish any speculation that Mrs Merkel will not seek a fourth term as chancellor next year in Germany’s federal election; expect an announcement soon.
Yet anyone expecting Germany to fill America’s shoes will be disappointed. Consider Mrs Merkel’s approach to crisis management, from the euro to Ukraine to refugees. Each played out differently, but Mrs Merkel’s prevarication was consistent: humming and hawing over bail-outs for indebted governments; taking Vladimir Putin at his word before realising he was a liar; reacting to the refugee surge rather than trying to prevent it. For those seeking stability, Mrs Merkel’s taste for hesitation may be a feature, not a bug, but it hardly makes for bold leadership.
Nor does German assertiveness inside Europe run smoothly. Seventy years after the second world war, protestors in Greece and Spain who resent Germany’s strict approach to fiscal stewardship still resort to Nazi tropes. The occasional attempt to form “anti-austerity” (read: anti-German) axes inside the EU elicits terror in Berlin. The world’s progressives may have loved it, but some in Berlin were uneasy at the chiding tone of Mrs Merkel’s letter of congratulation to Mr Trump, which pledged co-operation on the basis of a commitment to liberal values. “We are protected by our terrible history,” says Joschka Fischer, a former foreign minister. “You cannot say, ‘Make Germany Great Again’.”
More importantly, Pax Americana has always required American bite. Germany, with a defence budget one-fifteenth that of the United States, no nuclear deterrent and an instinct for pacifism, has neither the ability nor the aspiration to act as the world’s liberal hegemon. This is a country that went through agonies over whether to arm Iraqi Kurds battling Islamic State. Inside Europe, let alone elsewhere, only France and Britain have the ability to project power, and that suits Germans fine. Put bluntly, if Mr Putin’s tanks roll into the Baltics it will not be the Bundeswehr that takes the lead in rolling them back.
Mrs Merkel’s ambitions are altogether smaller. First among them is to hold together the fracturing EU, via a blend of prayer and policy. Germany is pinning its hopes on France, its eternal partner inside the EU, electing a sane president next year—ideally Alain Juppé, the centre-right front-runner. Franco-German comity should help EU governments find common ground on defence co-operation, the focus of their efforts over the next few months. (Mr Trump’s questionable commitment to NATO should provide another spur.) Should the politics prove propitious, Germany may one day be open to more ambitious schemes, such as greater integration of the euro zone. But grand visions of EU institutional change, let alone a German-led reshaping of the world order, are off the menu in Berlin. The priority is stopping the rot.
Meanwhile Mrs Merkel, her political capital depleted by the refugee crisis, must hold the line at home. Owing in part to the rise of the anti-immigration Alternative for Germany (AfD) party, the coalition that emerges from next year’s election will probably command a Bundestag majority far smaller than the one Mrs Merkel’s centrist grand coalition enjoys today. That will limit the chancellor’s room for manoeuvre, at home and in Europe. The political fragmentation is also disinterring old questions about Germany’s geopolitical allegiance. The Westbindung (Western integration), a staple of German foreign policy since Adenauer, is fraying as extremist parties on the left and right cosy up to Russia.
Leading from the mittel
And what about Mr Trump? For now, Germany retains a touching faith in America’s institutions to rein in the president-elect’s worst impulses. But from his vicious campaign to the chaotic management of his transition, there is every sign that Mr Trump will prove to be another of the erratic politicians, like Silvio Berlusconi and Nicolas Sarkozy, who have tested Mrs Merkel’s patience. Russia is a particular worry. If Mr Trump abandons Ukraine and allows America’s sanctions to wither, Mrs Merkel’s task of maintaining European unity will become almost impossible.
Germany’s stake in the global liberal order is immense. Its export-led economic model relies on robust international trade; its political identity is inexorably linked to a strong EU; its westward orientation assumes a friendly and engaged America. All of these things may now be in jeopardy, and Germany would suffer more than most from their demise. But do not look to Mrs Merkel to save them, for she cannot do so alone.

Consumer goods
Pot of gold
America’s cannabis industry prepares for new highs
Nov 19th 2016 | From the print edition



Flat white joint to go
IN THE 1990s Snoop Dogg, a rapper, called cannabis “chronic”. The drug was illicit and cool. In 2016 Mr Dogg is a cannabis investor, and the drug is poised to earn another title: consumer staple. On November 8th four states, including California, voted to approve recreational cannabis use. Four other states eased rules for medical marijuana. About three-fifths of America’s population lives in states that now allow cannabis use in some form.
So pot entrepreneurs face the thrilling prospect of normality. This week industry leaders were meeting in Las Vegas to discuss how the sector might expand. They have in prospect a vast, partially established market. More than 32m Americans already use cannabis. As the business becomes more normalised, it is sure to attract new customers. “It’s not often that you see an industry and you know the inevitability of it,” says Brendan Kennedy of Privateer Holdings, a private-equity firm that specialises in cannabis. Last year legal sales reached $6bn, according to the Arcview Group, an investment and market-research firm. By 2020 Arcview expects legal sales to be more than three times higher.
There remains the dispiriting fact that, on a national level, marijuana is still illegal. Federal agencies have generally respected states’ cannabis rules, but Donald Trump’s enforcers may be more aggressive. Even if they demur, the federal ban makes business difficult. Few banks are willing to lend to cannabis companies that handle the plant directly. Firms cannot operate across state lines, nor may they deduct common expenses from tax filings, which squeezes their profits.
Nevertheless, startups are spreading like weeds. Many of them serve the cannabis industry without touching the plant itself—these firms benefit from the sector’s growth while avoiding its strictest rules. For example Kush Bottles, based in California, sells product packaging that complies with idiosyncratic state requirements. Older firms are eyeing the industry as well. Scotts Miracle-Gro, a publicly traded gardening company, reckons it can serve not just ageing green thumbs but young cannabis growers, too.
Other companies deal with the plant directly, whether growing, processing or distributing it. Many early entrepreneurs have exited, unable to survive tight rules and falling cannabis prices brought about by legalisation. Bigger firms with strong management have, unsurprisingly, fared better. A company called LivWell now has 14 dispensaries across Colorado, which legalised recreational cannabis use in 2014. Its founder used to lead a firm that sold baby products to Walmart.
Cannabis firms have much in common with traditional consumer businesses. To cope with bans on interstate commerce, for example, those backed by Privateer license their brands and production methods to third parties in particular states, in much the same way that Coca-Cola depends on licensees in markets around the world. And just as big food companies grew in the 20th century by processing basic ingredients into tasty, more profitable snacks, for example, lots are processing plants into biscuits, gummy candies, tinctures and oils. “There’s not a lot of money to be made in tomatoes,” points out Arcview’s Troy Dayton, “but there’s a lot of money to be made in sauce.” In Colorado, the market share of cannabis flower, such as that typically rolled into a joint, fell from 68% in 2014 to 57% in the first nine months of this year, according to BDS Analytics, a data firm, but the processed versions of cannabis are on the rise.
Looming over the industry is the question of when tobacco companies might join the fray. Cigarette-makers certainly have the expertise to navigate complex rules for cannabis, points out Vivien Azer of Cowen, a financial-services firm. Their research on e-cigarettes could enhance vapour products for pot. If the federal government ever legalises the drug, tobacco firms would probably swoop in and snap up small, fast-growing firms. In the meantime, Colorado offers a tantalising glimpse of the future: there are now more cannabis dispensaries in the state than there are Starbucks coffee outlets.

November 11, 2016

Veterans’ Day, Capt John USN ret [nc]

Filed under: Political Commentary — justplainbill @ 4:11 pm

Veterans Day November 11th—Thank a Veteran

By Capt Joseph R. John, November 11, 2016

We “Honor” Veterans who have served in the US Armed Forces during the 240 year history of the Republic, and those who gave their last full measure of devotion in defense of the nation.

An average of 22 Veterans commit suicide every day, many of them are suffering from PTSD, and have not been able to obtain timely or proper medical treatment.

By clicking on the below listed link, you will be able to listen to a powerful message delivered by President Ronald Reagan about “a soldier and his pledge.”

A Veteran, at one point in his life, wrote a blank check made payable to “The United States of America” for an amount “up to and including his life.”

If you have the opportunity to remember a Veteran’s service in defense of the Republic—Thank a Veteran.

Joseph R. John, USNA ‘62

Capt USN(Ret)/Former FBI

Chairman, Combat Veterans For Congress PAC

2307 Fenton Parkway, Suite 107-184

San Diego, CA 92108

http://www.CombatVeteransForCongress.org

https://www.facebook.com/combatveteransforcongress?ref=hl

Then I heard the voice of the Lord, saying, “Whom shall I send, and who will go for Us?” Then I said, “Here am I. Send me!”
-Isaiah 6:8

November 10, 2016

Honor

Honor, get some tissues. I did a bunch of these when I was stationed at Camp LeJeune. I won’t compare to the gits rioting against the election.

http://tinyurl.com/zom68at

The American Creed, William Tyler Page, April 13, 1918

Filed under: Political Commentary — justplainbill @ 2:23 pm

THE AMERICAN CREED

“I believe in the United States of America as a government of the people, by the people, for the people; whose just powers are derived from the consent of the governed; a democracy in a republic; a sovereign nation of many sovereign states; a perfect union, one and inseparable; established upon those principles of freedom, equality, justice and humanity for which American patriots sacrificed their lives and fortunes.

I therefore believe it is my duty to my country to love it; to support its Constitution; to obey its laws; to respect its flag; and to defend it against all enemies.”

William Tyler Page – April 13, 1918

241 Years of Protecting Our Rights ooo Rah!

Filed under: Historical context, US Marine Corps — justplainbill @ 2:06 pm

Happy 241

Birthday cake ceremony:

November 9, 2016

The Election Fables of 2016, Victor Hanson [nc]

Filed under: Elections — justplainbill @ 2:46 am

The Election Fables of 2016
November 8, 2016 12:17 pm / Leave a Comment / victorhanson

by Victor Davis Hanson// National Review
Clear choices on the issues in 2016 have been far more distinct than in 1960, 1968, or 1992.
Most of what we read about the election of 2016 was untrue. Here are the most glaring of the election fables.
Hillary would have been better off politically to come clean long ago We hear a few on the left lament Hillary’s two-year stubbornness in stonewalling, lying, and distorting the facts surrounding her unlawful use of a private e-mail server — as if her problems were largely a result of not being candid soon enough.
Nothing could be further from the truth if we define “better” as “more politically viable.” Had Clinton in spring 2015, from the outset, confessed that she had violated federal law in her transmissions of classified material, or admitted that she had deleted some e-mails under subpoena that contained government business, or had she apologized for allotting, as secretary of state, time to Clinton Foundation patrons of her husband, on the basis of their donations and honoraria, she would have lost the primaries to Bernie Sanders and landed in jail.
Had the president and the Democratic National Committee not intervened to massage the political climate and help to warp the primaries, or had Donna Brazile not continued to sabotage the sanctity of the debates, Hillary might well not have found herself on the eve of the election tied or ahead in the polls for the presidency. Had Bill Clinton not met Loretta Lynch on the tarmac, James Comey might well have acted earlier and with greater effect — and avoided his flip-flopping.

In other words, in all these cases of malfeasance, Clinton calculated quite correctly that Attorney General Loretta Lynch and the entire Obama administration, as well as the media and the liberal establishment, would rally to her side, even when it was evident that her denials were empty and her conduct ethically bankrupt and clearly illegal.
Lying paid off. It got Hillary this far; it could win her the presidency, and there is little likelihood in this world that she will pay a price — and some likelihood she will continue to benefit from smooth prevarication. Cosmic justice will come, as it always does, but probably in her dotage — or somewhere else.
The truth is that for all her campaign weaknesses (voice, demeanor, stamina, etc.), she remains an effective liar and cynically and correctly believes that she is largely immune from accountability — a fact borne out by the 2016 election.
‘They go high, we go low’ Clinton enjoys quoting the supposed hip ethical platitudes of Michelle Obama and, by association, her husband (of campaigning ever more nobly while Trump campaigns still more ignobly).
In fact, the Clinton campaign has matched all mud thrown by Trump, toss for toss — perhaps even more so, given its far greater cash reserves. This final week, she and the president of the United States were falsely alleging that Trump welcomed the official endorsement of the Ku Klux Klan — as if Trump had sat on a bench at a rally of the KKK the same way that Obama once had described himself as being mentored by the racist, anti-American, and anti-Semite Reverend “Audacity of Hope” Jeremiah Wright.
There was nothing “going high” about labeling millions as “deplorables” and not real Americans, any more than Obama took the high road when he gave his clinger speech, his “typical white person” speech, or his “get in their faces” and “bring a gun to a knife fight” riffs. Most recently, Obama was all but assuring that illegal aliens could vote without fear of legal consequences, once again fleshing out Trump’s rigged-election paranoia as not so paranoid.
Michelle Obama in 2008 suggested that Hillary was unfit for the White House (“If you can’t run your own house, you can’t run the White House.”). She serially declared that she had never been proud of her country until her husband ran for president, that her country was “downright mean,” and that “they” were perpetually raising the bar on the one-percenter victimized Obamas. That may have been campaigning at some level, but it was certainly not going “high.”
In sum, the Obamas have often gone low, Hillary goes low, Trump goes low — they all, by their very natures of being politicians, go low. The only difference between them is that Trump has less often in hypocritical fashion bragged that he ever at all “goes high” — in the way that Hillary and the president now claim.
Clinton likely got debate questions in advance, without a peep of moral compunction over refusing such an unethical edge. Her team insulted Latinos and Catholics, and she predicated making lots of money by virtue of selling influence accruing from her public office. There was also nothing “high” in all that — any more than Obama’s own outright lying to the American people about the Affordable Care Act, or his insisting that he first learned of Hillary’s unlawful private e-mail domain in the news, or his administration’s use of the IRS to hound pre-reelection opponents.
Cruelty and coarseness are unattractive traits even in politicians, but they reek even worse when perfumed with sanctimony.
Trump’s crude past and present made him uniquely vulnerable to liberal attacks To believe that, we would have to accept two premises. First, that a crude and vulgar Trump is cruder and more vulgar in matters of sex than, for example, were Presidents Kennedy and Clinton, both still worshiped by liberals as landmark presidents. Trump’s business deals are as questionable as the sources of the LBJ fortune, which bothered few in the media. Trump is Trump, with a personal life as checkered as Hillary’s but amplified by his money and the opportunities of gratification and crudity afforded in one’s Manhattan private life free of the worries of a discreet politician.
Second, ever since the ascendency of their “war room,” the Clinton-inspired Left has attacked the integrity and morality of all Republican presidential candidates: McCain was rendered a near-senile coot, confused about the extent of his wife’s wealth and the number of their estates. No finer man ran for president than Mitt Romney. And by November 2012 when he lost, he had been reduced to a bullying hazer in his teen-age years, a vulture capitalist, a heartless plutocrat who was rude to his garbage man, tortured dogs, had an elevator in his house, and provided horses and stables to his aristocratic wife. All were either lies or exaggerations or irrelevant and all insidiously cemented the picture of the gentlemanly Romney as a preppie, out-of-touch, old white-guy snob, and gratuitously cruel to the less fortunate.
Trump was certainly more vulgar than either McCain or Romney, but what voters he lost owing to his crass candor he may well have gained back through his slash-and-burn, take-no-prisoners willingness to fight back against the liberal smear machine. We can envision what Marco Rubio, Jeb Bush, or Ted Cruz would look like after six months of “going high” from the Clinton-campaign treatment.
It is a mistake to believe that any other candidate would have better dealt with the Clinton-Podesta hit teams; all we can assume is that most would have suffered far more nobly than Trump. It would be wonderful if a Republican candidate ran with Romney’s personal integrity, Rubio’s charisma, Walker’s hands-on experience, Cruz’s commitment to constitutional conservatism, and Trump’s energy, animal cunning, and ferocity, but unfortunately such multifaceted candidates are rare.
The campaign marked a new low
One does not have to go back to 18th- and 19th-century smear-mongering to see that the crude electioneering this year was not so unusual.In 1944, an ailing FDR accused his Republican opponent of wanting to replicate the very Fascism at home that Americans were defeating abroad. The existential cover-up of FDR’s terminal health in November 1944 made Hillary’s dodges about her conditions minor stuff. McGovern often likened Nixon to Hitler. The 1964 LBJ “daisy” ad (resurrected by Hillary Clinton) trafficked in the charge that Barry Goldwater — the World War II pilot — was an utter nut who would blow up the world with nuclear weapons. The year 1968 saw riot, assassination, and blood in the streets.
When the noble patrician George H. W. Bush and his good-ol’-boy henchman Lee Atwater got done with the gentlemanly Michael Dukakis in 1988, he was a water polluter, murderer-releasing, wannabe-tank-driving wimp — dirt matched by a Dukakis campaign manager, Donna Brazile, who stoked rumor-mongering that the family man Bush was a philandering hypocrite.
When Bill Clinton’s hit team (fending off charges that he was a pro-Communist, marijuana-smoking draft dodger) finished with George H. W. Bush in 1992 (now without the services of the brilliantly demonic Atwater), the old combat fighter pilot was a wimp and near-planner of Iran-Contra — and likely to be indicted like his cronies such as the good but unfairly hounded Caspar Weinberger.
Again, spare us the sanctimony. Character assassination and cruelty have been trademarks of U.S. elections. In 1864, what Frémont, McClellan, and the Copperheads over the year said about Lincoln makes today’s disparagement seem tame. During that election year, newspaper grandee Horace Greeley flipped and flopped over the down-and-up Lincoln more than a Republican Never/Sometimes/Always Trumper up for reelection.

What was new in 2016 was not Hillary’s hit-team campaign (eerily reminiscent of Nixon’s 1972 CREEP operatives) or Trump’s “crooked Hillary” refrains but the social-media age of the Internet, Facebook, Twitter, and 24/7 cable news. For the first time, the electronic, lidless eye of millions hunted down race/class/gender politically incorrect “gaffes” to offer them up as a supposed window into a candidate’s dark soul.

There were no issues

The biggest myth of the election was that it was merely about who was worse between two unsavory candidates whose character flaws made issues irrelevant. The initial premise may be true that both were unattractive figures, but they certainly had quite different political agendas — a fact known to the voters.

On matters of Obamacare, fossil fuels, trade, the Supreme Court, abortion, illegal immigration, defense spending, the debt, taxes, regulation, and a host of other issues, Hillary, in her convenient hard-left remake, took an unapologetic hard-progressive stance. Donald Trump, in his latest incarnation, adopted positions mostly identical to those of most conservatives. Both were candid in their views about a future Supreme Court. Hillary would likely expand sanctuary cities; Trump would deny them federal funds. Hillary could not have been more antithetical to Trump on Obamacare. And on and on.

Clear choices on the issues in 2016 were far more distinct than in 1960, 1968, or 1992. Ironically, two unattractive candidates canceled each other out, and had the odd effect of turning attention to the Supreme Court or health care in a way not true of prior “nice” campaigns.

Also in mythical fashion, perhaps a few Never Trumpers clung to a fantasy that the real Hillary was only playacting hard-left. Once safely elected, supposedly she would revert to centrist Bill Clinton themes of the 1990s, as she welcomed former “bipartisan” neo-cons back into her advisory circle and service as newly minted neo-liberals to follow Dean Acheson’s visions. And it was an even greater myth that Trump was going to revert to his 1980s libertine self and govern to the left of Obama.

Both ran on partisan, contrary agendas, and supporters of both were correct to see each as the opposite of the other.

The year 2016, for all its carnival barking, ended up as a clash of visions, and a fork in the American road.

November 7, 2016

Obama encourages illegals to vote, Joseph John , [c]

Obama Encourages Illegal Aliens to Vote in Video – Promises No Repercussions

By Capt Joseph R. John, November 7, 2016

The nation has had a very serious Voter Fraud problem, going back to the Nixon Kennedy Presidential election of 1960, when Mayor Richard M. Daley of Chicago was accused of having his Democratic Machine perpetrate “Voter Fraud” in the city of Chicago. The Chicago voting total tipped the state of Illinois into John Kennedy’s win column, and threw the Presidential election to John Kennedy. The Democratic “machine” came up with 8,858 votes from Chicago graveyards and elsewhere to steal the election from Richard Nixon. Even though Richard Nixon was provided with evidence of massive “Voter Fraud” perpetrated by the Chicago Democratic Machine, he refused to contest the election because he didn’t want to create a Constitutional crisis in the United States.

In 1982, Voter Fraud rose its ugly head again un Chicago and resulted in one of the largest “Voter Fraud” prosecutions ever conducted by the U.S. Department of Justice. The telltale smoke arose out of one of the closest governor’s races in Illi­nois history; and as for the fire, the U.S. Attorney in Chicago at the time, Daniel Webb, estimated that at least 100,000 fraudulent votes (10 percent of all votes in the city) had been cast. Sixty-five individuals were indicted for federal election crimes, and all but two (one found incompetent to stand trial and another who died) were convicted. CBS’ Local Chicago affiliate reported that 119 dead people have voted 229 times in the last decade, with one dead man voting 11 times.

Obama met Madeleine Talbot, part of the Chicago branch of ACORN, he was asked to train the ACORN staff in Chicago after he graduated from Harvard and moved to Chicago. ACORN engage in bullying banks, forcing them to issue risky loans, and ACORN intimidation and disruption businesses. During the 2004 United States Presidential elections, Voter Fraud raised its ugly head again, and the American voters nationally first became acquainted with ACORN, which was funded by the Democratic party. ACORN perpetrated voter fraud in massive amounts that in the 2008 Presidential election of Obama. There were 11 major investigations across the nation involving thousands of potentially fraudulent actions by ACORN employees following the election.

In 2009, ACORN was charged and convicted in Wisconsin, Florida, Michigan, Indiana, Pennsylvania, Maryland, New York, and California of massive “Voter Registration Fraud.” ACORN simply kept the same people on its employment rolls, and changed the name of the organization in every state in the union, and continued to train its personnel to perpetrate “Voter Fraud.”

From 2008 to 2012, Obama’s Department of Health and Human Services funded those same former ACORN organizations, and enabled them to continue registration fraud of Illegal Aliens in many states. They have become very effective in states that issue drivers licenses to Illegal Aliens, so those Illegal Aliens can use their driver’s licenses to obtain Social Security numbers, and then use both the driver’s license and Social Security Cards to register to vote.

In the 2012 presidential election, many Illegal aliens voted, Those former ACORN organizations were funded by Obama’s Department of Health and Human Services from 2012 to 2016 which enabled them to continue the “Voter Registration Fraud.”

Hans Von Spakovsky, senior legal fellow and manager of the Election Law Reform Initiative at the Heritage Foundation, has maintained that there’s enough “Voter Fraud” to make a difference in a close election. His think tank has compiled 430 cases of “Voter Fraud” that resulted in a conviction or a judge ordering a new election.(WND.com 11/7/16)

Several cases have arisen in just the past week, along with the revelations by James O’Keefe’s Project Veritas, which captured on hidden camera a top Democratic operative engineering wide-scale “Vote Fraud.” (WND.com 11/7/16)

Last Thursday in Pennsylvania, a state the Trump campaign believes it can win, state police raided two offices of a voter registration group in Philadelphia after raiding another office in Delaware County, Pennsylvania, just days earlier. The Philadelphia Inquirer reported police used a warrant seeking forms that could be used to “construct fraudulent voter registration forms” and “completed voter registration forms containing same or similar identifying information of individuals on multiple forms.”

(WND.com 11/7/16)

State officials in Texas are investigating reports of a “vote harvesting” scheme in which as many as 20,000 ballots has been filled in and delivered for people in Tarrant County. (WND.com 11/7/16)

In San Pedro, California, on Saturday, FoxNews.com reported, Jerry Mosna found 83 unused election ballots – all addressed to different people – stacked on the mailbox of an elderly neighbor who lives in a two-bedroom apartment.. (WND.com 11/7/16)

This year Illegal Aliens have been flooding across the wide open southern border, they have been released upon entry in accordance with Obama’s instructions (they should have been quarantined for at least 30 days in accordance with US Federal Immigration Laws, before release). It has been reported that hundreds of thousands of those Illegal Aliens have been registered to vote illegally.

If you click on the below listed link you will be able to watch a video of Obama encouraging Illegal Aliens to vote, and he promises them, in the interview, that there will be no repercussions if they vote illegally—a violation of US Federal Voting Laws. Obama is the first occupant of the Oval Office in 240 years to encourage Illegal Aliens to vote, while assuring them that there will not be any repercussions for voting illegally.

Copyright by Capt Joseph R. John. All Rights Reserved. The material can only posted on another Web site or distributed on the Internet by giving full credit to the author. It may not be published, broadcast, or rewritten without the permission from the author.

Joseph R. John, USNA ‘62

Capt USN(Ret)/Former FBI

Chairman, Combat Veterans For Congress PAC

2307 Fenton Parkway, Suite 107-184

San Diego, CA 92108

http://www.CombatVeteransForCongress.org

https://www.facebook.com/combatveteransforcongress?ref=hl

Then I heard the voice of the Lord, saying, “Whom shall I send, and who will go for Us?” Then I said, “Here am I. Send me!”
-Isaiah 6:8

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Obama Encourages Illegal Aliens to Vote – Promises No Repercussions

When multiple supporters sent the below listed link to us we said, no way, even Obama would never say to vote illegally.

But we were wrong.

Barack Obama illegally and openly called on Illegal Aliens to vote in Tuesday’s election——just watch the below listed video when you click on the below listed link.

The Obama administration has proved to be lawless when it comes to US Federal Voting Laws by viewing the below listed link!

They Hillary and Obama have been lying at every turn.

The occupant in the Oval Office lied to get Obamacare passed when he said you can keep your doctor and your insurance.
The occupant of the Oval Office and Hillary lied about Benghazi when they said it was a spontaneous riot about a movie, not terrorism.
The occupant of the Oval Office lied when he said he didn’t know about Hillary’s private illegal server and emails.

The occupant in the Oval Office said I will bridge the gap between black and white Americas.

Click
here: Obama encourages illegal aliens to vote without fear of being deported. –
YouTube

[Gosh, all of this going on in THE BLUE STATES. Secession, secession, secession.]

November 6, 2016

The Alienated American, Victor Hanson [c]

Filed under: Political Commentary — Tags: , , , , , — justplainbill @ 4:31 pm

The Alienated American
October 31, 2016 9:36 am / Leave a Comment / Megan Ring
by Victor Davis Hanson// Defining Ideas

Many Americans increasingly seem psychologically, if not materially, disengaged from their own country. A few vote with their feet and move to quieter enclaves in the American rural West or to no-income-tax states in the South and hinterlands. More withdraw with their minds, by shutting out most of the noise emanating from American popular culture, politics, and the media.

I spent my vacation in September in small towns in southern Michigan, and a few days of October traveling to a number of communities in rural California, as well as talking to a variety of people on my farm. In all these venues, I kept meeting the same sort of detached American. Though these men and women came from varying class and ethnic backgrounds, they were united by a sense of malaise. Let me sum up what I think is the new Americanus alienatus.

The American stranger embraces a pessimistic view of this country, rather than the therapeutic view shared by most Americans. Given the nation’s cultural and financial profligacy, he assumes things are going to get worse. Or at least he accepts that they cannot go on as they are. The medicine (that will fall on him to administer) will be as catastrophic as the lethal disease (which he thinks was caused mostly by others).

Stereotyped as a “deplorable” “clinger” and “everyday American,” the stranger certainly has no wish to dispute the new politically correct orthodoxies of open borders, Black Lives Matter, the euphemisms that mask radical Islamic terrorism, record deficits, unsustainable entitlements, and chaos abroad. All of that, he believes, is now the concern of the members of the coastal establishment, whose incestuous lives are glimpsed in the latest WikiLeaks trove.

The disengaged American’s own existential business is survival. It takes all his energy and resources to navigate around the concrete ramifications of what elites have wrought, like failing public school systems, crime-ridden cityscapes, and Kafkaesque bureaucracies. The elites, meanwhile, have far better ways of insulating themselves from the injurious effects of their own ideology.

The stranger believes we are running out of answers to increasing racial and ethnic tensions. As a drop-out himself, when he reads daily of shootings, stabbings, riots, and assaults, he makes a mental note of where they take place, knows enough to keep quiet about them, and plans to stay a safe distance away.

Politics is a turn-off, epitomized this year by the crude Donald Trump and the refined and inveterate prevaricator Hillary Clinton. Both seem to reflect our long-standing hubris, in which we glorified empty celebrities and overlooked the high crimes and misdemeanors of professional politicians, who made their own rules of behavior that ultimately (and logically) permitted destroying government documents, recklessly trafficking in classified information, and selling government influence to the highest bidders. To the extent Trump wins sympathy among estranged Americans, it is largely because he represents the nihilistic choice: the idea of a humiliated and doomed Samson pulling down the pillars of the Philistine temple upon us all apparently has a sort of psychological and vicarious attraction for the American stranger, especially when he reads of the contempt that the elite hold for people like himself.

Neither candidate talks about the financial Armageddon ahead, when raising interest rates will make it nearly impossible to meet existing outlays and service a $20 trillion national debt. In contrast, the quiet American assumes that the remedies of inflation or catastrophic budget cuts in defense and entitlements—or more likely both—are inevitable. He assumes his own financial future is bleak, and his children’s even bleaker. In paranoia, he readies himself for anything, whether that means European-level tax rates or the loss of his private 401K to the insolvent Social Security trust fund. Sometimes, the nuts who advocate buying gold do not seem so nutty to him.

Hypocrisy is the national creed, and the turned-off American survives by navigating around or ignoring it. Illegal aliens, seen as an important new political demographic, are increasingly immune from federal immigration law. Many new immigrants assume that America is the choice destination of the world, but when they get here, they find that the lure of lodging grievances against their generous host is the better path to political influence and government largess. Assimilation, in contrast, is written off as proof of inauthenticity.

The turned-off know well enough to keep quiet about political correctness. They accept that just one wrong word can at any time end careers as a clerk, cop, or teacher. The disaffected also still trust that college is a future investment for their kids, but have no clue how to pay for it. They are also unsure how to weigh the pluses of receiving a bachelor’s degree against the minuses of being indoctrinated by a small, bitter subset of the population.

The quiet American is also cynical. He expects elites to be pretenders. The hacked emails of insiders Colin Powell and John Podesta, and Hillary Clinton’s $250,000 Wall Street chats confirmed what most believed about low-bar Washington values. Trump’s eleven-year old hot-mic vulgarities rebirthed Bill Clinton’s alleged sexual assaults, reminding the cynical that in the age of Miley Cyrus, Chris Brown, and Kim Kardashian, America is both crude and sanctimonious at the same time.

So the drop-out American turns off the media, and not merely because of its 24/7 hyperkinetic frenzy, but because he is fed up by its superficiality and hypocrisy—and its abject partisanship dressed up as edginess. Most journalists assume their role is either to further their own careers or to convince the supposedly ignorant masses to endorse the progressive views embraced by only 20 percent of the population. Either way, millions of Americans have checked out, retiring instead to the blogosphere and comments sections of articles. The alienated American also does not go to the movies much. The reason is not just because excellent entertainment is easily available at home on his various devices. The problem, rather, is the message. A politically warped Hollywood is, like the media, trumpeting political ideas that do not resonate with most viewers.

The alienated American is touched by, but avoids, popular culture. He cannot figure out the attraction of the harsh voices, grating beat, and glorification of misogyny, racism, and violence in rap music. He knows of a Kanye West or Miley Cyrus only to the degree that such entertainers sometimes intrude into the mainstream media, causing confusion over exactly how such untalented exhibitionists ever won an audience, and why, in such a Victorian society such as our own, their obscenities still remain politically correct.

The quiet American was once devoted to televised sports, but increasingly is losing interest there as well. San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick, who refuses to stand for the national anthem on the ground that America is racist, hardly represents speaking truth to power. He is another pampered multimillionaire athlete who has manipulated his sport for personal attention and gain. The alienated American also avoids ESPN and similar sport channels. He believes that life is too short to listen to half-educated jocks posing as Socratic philosophers as they politicize their analyses and try to turn gladiators on the field into heroic progressive humanists.

The media, contemporary politics, sports, Hollywood, popular music, government policy, political correctness, the pretenses of the elite—all of these have driven a sizeable minority of the population into a psychological underground. Every once in a while, I see the alienated American, who gives me a nod or wink at the supermarket or gas station—a confirmation that he has become a stranger in his own strange land.

[And, now, with the Veritas Project Action having videos of the DNC operatives fixing elections, liberal states like NH having laws that state that anyone with an in-state domicile, meaning coming in the day before an election and staying at a hotel, can vote simply by showing up and stating that they are domiciled in NH and are a citizen, the simple statement being enough to prove citizenship, the alienation is also caused by the political elite emasculating the “regular citizen”. We are not back to the necessity of the Red States seceding. Read the post on secession. Buy, read, and promote, “The Albany Plan Re-Visited”.]

November 3, 2016

Indictment of Hillary Possible, by Joseph John, Capt USN ret [nc]

Filed under: Political Commentary — justplainbill @ 2:30 pm

Today at 8:39 AM
Indictment of Hillary Clinton Very Possible; Felonies Include Bribery, Fraud, and Obstruction of Justice

By Capt Joseph R. John, November 3, 2016

Fifty years ago Ayn Rand so aptly described Hillary Clinton’s Corrupt Money Laundering RICO Enterprise

“Watch money. Money is the barometer of a society’s virtue. When you see that trading is done, not by consent, but by compulsion — when you see that in order to produce, you need to obtain permission from men who produce nothing — when you see that money is flowing to those who deal, not in goods, but in favors — when you see that men get richer by graft and by pull, than by work, and your laws don’t protect you against them, but protect them against you — when you see corruption being rewarded and honesty becoming a self-sacrifice — you may know that your society is doomed.”
—philosopher and novelist Ayn Rand (1905-1982)

The WikiLeaks E-mails revealed the magnitude of Hillary’s corruption, Hillary’s deceit, and her criminal transmission of over 2000 Secret, Top Secret, Top Secret Compartmented Special Access E-mails on a unclassified server located in the basement of her home. The American people learned from the FBI and from WikiLeaks messages, that Hillary’s unclassified server was hacked 10 times, on one day alone, and according to FBI sources, there is a 99% chance that 5 foreign Intelligence Agencies hacked into Hillary’s unclassified server over a 4 year period. The FBI is investigating those violations under the Espionage Act of the United States.

Access to Secret and Top Secret Compartmented Special Access E-mails by Foreign Hackers:

1) Ended up in compromising US Intelligence methods
2) Resulted in the loss of life of US intelligence assets in foreign countries
3) Put highly sensitive classified material in play by many unfriendly foreign governments
4) Revealed the lack of security at the Benghazi US Mission, and aided 125 Islamic Terrorists to kill the US Ambassador and 3 other Americans in Libya
5) Put 5 Foreign Intelligence Agencies in a position to blackmail Hillary Clinton, if she is ever elected as the US President.

The magnitude of Hillary’s criminal violations of the National Security Laws of the United States in her handling, transmission, and receipt of over 2000 highly classified E-mails, on an unclassified server, over a 4 year period, requires impaneling of a Grand Jury to investigate her actions. Hillary’s Top Secret clearance should be revoked. If the US Government ever hopes to enforce the National Security Laws of the United States with regard to the handling of classified documents by civil service personnel, members of the US Armed Forces, and civilian contractors, it must take legal action in Hillary’s case.

The American people also learned from the WikiLeaks E-mails that the Assistant Attorney General of the United States, Peter Kazdzik, a close personal friend and former lawyer of John Podesta, Hillary’s Presidential Campaign Chairman, leaked sensitive details on the FBI investigation of Hillary criminal violations of US National Security Laws in sending and receiving highly classified messages. The actions of the Assistant Attorney General reveals a conflict of interest and corrupt practices by the Attorney General’s Office.

For over a year, the White Collar Crime Division of the FBI, has been investigating the “pay to play” criminal corrupt activities of the Clinton Foundation. Attorney General Lynch and some of the supervisors at FBI Headquarters in Washington, DC refused to permit the issuance of subpoenas, or the impaneling of a Grand Jury to investigate the criminal corruption and money laundering of the Clinton Foundation in violation of the RICO Law (the Corrupt Organization act of 1971). Disregarding the attempt by Attorney General Lynch to frustrate the investigation of the Clinton Foundation, FBI Agents in 5 offices pressed forward with their investigation of public corruption and money laundering of the Clinton Foundation.

The RICO scheme involved (a) the exchange of political favors, access, and influence for millions of dollars in donations; (b) the circumvention of campaign-finance laws that prohibit political donations by foreign sources; (c) a vehicle for Mrs. Clinton to shield her State Department E-mail communications from public and congressional scrutiny while she and her husband exploited the fundraising potential of her position; and (d) a means for Clinton insiders to receive private-sector compensation and explore lucrative employment opportunities while drawing taxpayer-funded government salaries. The White Collar Crime Division has announced that an indictment of Hillary Clinton is likely; the listed felonies include bribery, fraud, and obstruction of justice.

Hillary leveraged her public office as Secretary of State to enrich herself, she transmitted 33,000 E-mails on a private server in the basement of her home, in order to keep those E-mails out of public scrutiny if they had been transmitted on a State Department server. Hilary then deleted those 33,000 E-mails, that would have betrayed her corrupt “Pay For Play” activities and the money laundering. One of the “Pay For Play” charges was that Hillary betrayed the people of the United States by approving the sale 20% of the strategic uranium production of the United States to Vladimir Putin for payment of $139 million to the Clinton Foundation.

Attorney General Lynch structured an “Immunity Deal” to protect Hillary Clinton, by authorizing the destruction of the hard drives of Cherly Mills and Heather Samuelson laptops. It was an attempt to prevent the FBI Agents investigating the Clinton Foundation Case from seeing what was on those hard drives with regard to “Pay For Play” and money laundering criminal activities. It didn’t work, because the FBI Agents refused to destroy the hard drives, because those hard drives are evidence in a criminal case.

Despite Attorney General Lynch attempts to tie the hands of the FBI Agents investigating the corruption and money laundering of the Clinton Foundation. the FBI Agents in the White Collar Crime Division of the FBI disregarded Attorney General Lynch’s attempt to close down the investigation into the corruption of what happened to hundreds of millions of dollars. Only 6% of the hundreds of millions of the “pay to play” funds collected, were donated to charity.

The balance of the hundreds of millions of dollars funds collected by the Clinton Foundation were used to cover massive overhead expenses, heavy luxury travel expenses, the lavish salaries of staff who were parked in the Clinton Foundation on salary, until they could be transferred to the Clinton for President Campaign 4 years later. Some of the people working for the State Department, like Huma Abedin, John Podesta, Cheryl Mills, and others were illegally paid an obscene second salary from the Clinton Foundation.

The review of Huma Abedin computer and hand held devices revealed 650,000 E-mails, including many State Department E-mails that that were never submitted to the Congress in compliance with the Congressional subpoena issued to Hillary to turn in all State Department E-mails. The FBI Agents in the National Security Division investigating the case, continued the investigation, nonstop (despite Director Comey statement that he wasn’t recommending an indictment); they are going thru every one of the 650,000 E-mails, recalling & interrogating witnesses who were previously interviewed a second and third time.

The National Security Division and the White Collar Crime Division of the FBI, should not be pursuing separate tracks in their cases against Hillary Clinton, they should be pursuing one case on Criminal Corruption, Money Laundering, Violating the National Security Laws of the US, Fraud, Bribery, Violation of the Rico Laws, Violating the Espionage Act, and Obstruction of Justice. Rudi Giuliani who was the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York and prosecuted the pivotal case against the American Mafia, stated on national television, that Hillary has violated between 20 and 30 Federal Laws, and he feels he can easily get convictions on most of those cases

Hillary couldn’t handle the security of a 13 acre US Mission in Benghazi, Libya; her failure to provide the sufficient security after 12 desperate requests by US Ambassador Stevens over a 9 month period, resulted in the death of the US Ambassador, two US Navy SEALs, and a State Department Communication Specialist. The American people should not turn the National Security of the United States over to Hillary Clinton, it would be disastrous. Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton have both been disbarred, and will never be permitted to practice law again, because of their corruption and dishonesty—Hillary is unfit and unqualified to be President.

Copyright by Capt Joseph R. John. All Rights Reserved. The material can only posted on another Web site or distributed on the Internet by giving full credit to the author. It may not be published, broadcast, or rewritten without the permission from the author.

Joseph R. John, USNA ‘62
Capt USN(Ret)/Former FBI
Chairman, Combat Veterans For Congress PAC
2307 Fenton Parkway, Suite 107-184
San Diego, CA 92108

http://www.CombatVeteransForCongress.org

https://www.facebook.com/combatveteransforcongress?ref=hl

Then I heard the voice of the Lord, saying, “Whom shall I send, and who will go for Us?” Then I said, “Here am I. Send me!”
-Isaiah 6:8
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Clinton’s State Department: A RICO Enterprise

by Andrew C. McCarthy III, National Review, October 29, 2016

Felony mishandling of classified information, including our nation’s most closely guarded intelligence secrets; the misappropriation and destruction of tens of thousands of government records — these are serious criminal offenses. To this point, the Justice Department and FBI have found creative ways not to charge Hillary Clinton for them. Whether this will remain the case has yet to be seen. As we go to press, the stunning news has broken that the FBI’s investigation is being reopened. It appears, based on early reports, that in the course of examining communications devices in a separate “sexting” investigation of disgraced former congressman Anthony Weiner, the bureau stumbled on relevant e-mails — no doubt connected to Huma Abedin, Mr. Weiner’s wife and, more significantly, Mrs. Clinton’s closest confidant. According to the New York Times, the FBI has seized at least one electronic device belonging to Ms. Abedin as well. New e-mails, never before reviewed by the FBI, have been recovered.

The news is still emerging, and there will be many questions — particularly if it turns out that the bureau failed to obtain Ms. Abedin’s communications devices earlier in the investigation, a seemingly obvious step. As we await answers, we can only observe that, whatever the FBI has found, it was significant enough for director James Comey to sense the need to notify Congress, despite knowing what a bombshell this would be just days before the presidential election.

One thing, however, is already clear. Whatever the relevance of the new e-mails to the probe of Clinton’s classified-information transgressions and attempt to destroy thousands of emails, these offenses may pale in comparison with Hillary Clinton’s most audacious violations of law: Crimes that should still be under investigation; crimes that will, in fitting Watergate parlance, be a cancer on the presidency if she manages to win on November 8.

Mrs. Clinton appears to have converted the office of secretary of state into a racketeering enterprise. This would be a violation of the RICO law — the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act of 1971 (codified in the U.S. penal code at sections 1961 et seq.).

Hillary and her husband, former president Bill Clinton, operated the Clinton Foundation. Ostensibly a charity, the foundation was a de facto fraud scheme to monetize Hillary’s power as secretary of state (among other aspects of the Clintons’ political influence). The scheme involved (a) the exchange of political favors, access, and influence for millions of dollars in donations; (b) the circumvention of campaign-finance laws that prohibit political donations by foreign sources; (c) a vehicle for Mrs. Clinton to shield her State Department e-mail communications from public and congressional scrutiny while she and her husband exploited the fundraising potential of her position; and (d) a means for Clinton insiders to receive private-sector compensation and explore lucrative employment opportunities while drawing taxpayer-funded government salaries.

While the foundation did perform some charitable work, this camouflaged the fact that contributions were substantially diverted to pay lavish salaries and underwrite luxury travel for Clinton insiders. Contributions skyrocketed to $126 million in 2009, the year Mrs. Clinton arrived at Foggy Bottom. Breathtaking sums were “donated” by high-rollers and foreign governments that had crucial business before the State Department. Along with those staggering donations came a spike in speaking opportunities and fees for Bill Clinton. Of course, disproportionate payments and gifts to a spouse are common ways of bribing public officials — which is why, for example, high-ranking government officeholders must reveal their spouses’ income and other asset information on their financial-disclosure forms.

While there are other egregious transactions, the most notorious corruption episode of Secretary Clinton’s tenure involves the State Department’s approval of a deal that surrendered fully one-fifth of the United States’ uranium-mining capacity to Vladimir Putin’s anti-American thugocracy in Russia.

The story, significant background of which predates Mrs. Clinton’s tenure at the State Department, has been recounted in ground-breaking reporting by the Hoover Institution’s Peter Schweizer (in his remarkable book Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich) and the New York Times. In a nutshell, in 2005, under the guise of addressing the incidence of HIV/AIDS in Kazakhstan (where the disease is nearly nonexistent), Bill Clinton helped his Canadian billionaire pal Frank Giustra to convince the ruling despot, Nursultan Nazarbayev (an infamous torturer and human-rights violator), to grant coveted uranium-mining rights to Giustra’s company, Ur-Asia Energy (notwithstanding that it had no background in the highly competitive uranium business). Uranium is a key component of nuclear power, from which the United States derives 20 percent of its total electrical power.

In the months that followed, Giustra gave an astonishing $31.3 million to the Clinton Foundation and pledged $100 million more. With the Kazakh rights secured, Ur-Asia was able to expand its holdings and attract new investors, like Ian Telfer, who also donated $2.35 million to the Clinton Foundation. Ur-Asia merged with Uranium One, a South African company, in a $3.5 billion deal — with Telfer becoming Uranium One’s chairman. The new company proceeded to buy up major uranium assets in the United States.

Meanwhile, as tends to happen in dictatorships, Nazarbayev (the Kazakh dictator) turned on the head of his state-controlled uranium agency (Kazatomprom), who was arrested for selling valuable mining rights to foreign entities like Ur-Asia/Uranium One. This was likely done at the urging of Putin, the neighborhood bully whose state-controlled atomic-energy company (Rosatom) was hoping to grab the Kazakh mines — whether by taking them outright or by taking over Uranium One.
The arrest, which happened a few months after Obama took office, sent Uranium One stock into free fall, as investors fretted that the Kazakh mining rights would be lost. Uranium One turned to Secretary Clinton’s State Department for help. As State Department cables disclosed by WikiLeaks show, Uranium One officials wanted more than a U.S. statement to the media; they pressed for written confirmation that their mining licenses were valid. Secretary Clinton’s State Department leapt into action: An energy officer from the U.S. embassy immediately held meetings with the Kazakh regime. A few days later, it was announced that Russia’s Rosatom had purchased 17 percent of Uranium One. Problem solved.

Except it became a bigger problem when the Russian company sought to acquire a controlling interest in Uranium One. That would mean a takeover not only of the Kazakh mines but of the U.S. uranium assets as well. Such a foreign grab requires approval by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, a powerful government tribunal that the secretary of state sits on and heavily influences. Though she had historically postured as a hawk against foreign acquisitions of American assets with critical national-security implications, Secretary Clinton approved the Russian takeover of Uranium One. During and right after the big-bucks Russian acquisition, Telfer contributed $1.35 million to the Clinton Foundation. Other people with ties to Uranium One appear to have ponied up as much as $5.6 million in donations.

In 2009, the incoming Obama administration had been deeply concerned about the potential for corruption were Hillary to run the State Department while Bill and their family foundation were hauling in huge payments from foreign governments, businesses, and entrepreneurs. For precisely this reason, the White House required Mrs. Clinton to agree in writing that the Clinton Foundation would annually disclose its major donors and seek pre-approval from the White House before the foundation accepted foreign contributions. This agreement was repeated flouted — for example, by concealing the contributions from Telfer. Indeed, the foundation was recently forced to refile its tax returns for the years that Secretary Clinton ran the State Department after media reports that it failed to disclose foreign donations — approximately $20 million worth.

Under RICO, an “enterprise” can be any association of people, informal or formal, illegitimate or legitimate — it could be a Mafia family, an ostensibly charitable foundation, or a department of government. It is a racketeering enterprise if its affairs are conducted through “a pattern of racketeering activity.” A “pattern” means merely two or more violations of federal or state law; these violations constitute “racketeering activity” if they are included among the extensive list of felonies laid out in the statute.

Significantly for present purposes, the listed felonies include bribery, fraud, and obstruction of justice. Fraud encompasses both schemes to raise money on misleading pretexts (e.g., a charitable foundation that camouflages illegal political payoffs) and schemes to deprive Americans of their right to the honest services of a public official (e.g., quid pro quo arrangements in which official acts are performed in exchange for money). Both fraud and obstruction can be proved by false statements — whether they are public proclamations (e.g., “I turned over all work-related e-mails to the State Department”) or lies to government officials (e.g., concealing “charitable” donations from foreign sources after promising to disclose them, or claiming not to know that the “(C)” symbol in a government document means it is classified at the confidential level).

The WikiLeaks disclosures of e-mails hacked from Clinton presidential-campaign chairman John Podesta provide mounting confirmation that the Clinton Foundation was orchestrated for the purpose of enriching the Clintons personally and leveraging then-Secretary Clinton’s power to do it. Hillary and her underlings pulled this off by making access to her contingent on Clinton Foundation ties; by having top staff service Clinton Foundation donors and work on Clinton Foundation business; by systematically conducting her e-mail communications outside the government server system; by making false statements to the public, the White House, Congress, the courts, and the FBI; and by destroying thousands of e-mails — despite congressional inquiries and Freedom of Information Act demands — in order to cover up (among other things) the shocking interplay between the State Department and the Clinton Foundation.

Under federal law, that can amount to running an enterprise by a pattern of fraud, bribery, and obstruction. If so, it is a major crime. Like the major crimes involving the mishandling of classified information and destruction of government files, it cries out for a thorough and credible criminal investigation. More important, wholly apart from whether there is sufficient evidence for criminal convictions, there is overwhelming evidence of a major breach of trust that renders Mrs. Clinton unfit for any public office, let along the nation’s highest public office.

Andrew C. McCarthy III is a former assistant U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York. He led the 1995 terrorism prosecution against Sheikh Omar Abdel Rahman and eleven others. The defendants were convicted of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing and of planning a series of attacks against New York City landmarks. He also contributed to the prosecutions of terrorists who bombed U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania. He resigned from the Justice Department in 2003. He is a contributing editor of National Review and a senior fellow at the National Review Institute.

November 2, 2016

What We Leave Behind – Matters, Capt Joseph John [nc]

Filed under: Political Commentary — justplainbill @ 1:51 pm


Nov 1 at 10:49 AM

Combat Veterans For Congress PAC Mission Statement
The Combat Veterans For Congress Political Action Committee is dedicated to supporting the election of fiscally conservative Combat Veterans to Congress. We seek Combat Veterans For Congress who believe in limited government, will rein in the out of control spending of Congress, are committed to preserving and defending the US Constitution, and will support the independence and freedom of the individual as outlined in The Bill of Rights. We support Combat Veterans For Congress who are dedicated to promoting The Free Enterprise System that created the greatest economic engine in the history of mankind, who will provide for a strong national defense, and who will endorse the teaching of US History and the Founding Father’s core values in educational institutions.

What We Leave Behind—Matters!

By Capt Joseph R. John, November 1, 2016

The below listed article was written by one of the members of the Board of Directors of the Combat Veterans For Congress PAC, Capt R. Buddy Welborn, USNA Class of 1959, USN (Ret), PhD, who is a Trustee of the US Naval Academy Foundation. The article should be read by every American before they vote, in the up and coming national election. Capt Welborn was motivated to write the article after reading Eric Bolling’s bestselling book, “Wake Up America!”, it supports “The Free Enterprise System” that created the most effective economic engine in the history of mankind, and encourages instilling the “Pride in America” in our nation’s youth.

Over the past 8 years, Common Core has force fed its corrupted version of US History in grammar, Junior high, and high schools. The teaching of Patriotic Pride, that once was uniform, has been downgraded and in some cases eliminated. Some teachers have actually raised the Mexican flag over their schools, and in some schools the “Pledge Allegiance” to the flag has also been eliminated. The “Pride In America” once instilled in all grammar, junior high, & high schools has been downgraded by the Common Core Curriculum being taught using US History books with a corrupted version of US History.

The religious values upon which the Republic was founded are no longer taught to students. That is partially responsible for the acceptance of Socialism by young students, who have not been taught the strengths of the Republican form of government, in comparison with the flawed Socialist form of government being subtly promoted by the Common Core curriculum. The students are not taught that Socialism has never worked in any country where it has ever been tried over the last 100+ years.

The Department of Human Resources is requiring State School Boards to purchase US History books, with a corrupted version of US History, that are required by the Common Core curriculum. The revised US History books, along with the Common Core curriculum, have eliminated many of the early Patriots, find fault with many of the Founding Fathers, no longer instills “Patriotic Pride”, inserts new individuals to make the history politically correct, and criticizes the motives of the nation throughout history. Many teachers who do not have “Pride in America”, teach the Common Core curriculum, and use US History books with corrupted versions of US History, have created a generation of students who no longer have “Pride in America.”

America witnessed the lack of “Pride in America” by young professional football players refusing to stand when the National Anthem is played prior to the commencement of the game—the disrespect for the National Anthem is being copied at some high school football games by some high school football players copying the professional football players. Many of the weak kneed owners of Professional Football Teams, and the Executives of the National Football league (NFL) and the American Football League (AFL) are allowing the National Anthem and the American Flag to be dishonored at professional football games.

Young football players who refuse to stand when the National Anthem is played, continue their disrespect because the owners lack the backbone to put an end to it. The American fans are making the NFL and the AFL lose at the box office, by substantially reducing their attendance. There is an obvious difference of how the National Anthem and the American Flag are honored during professional baseball games, and how the National Anthem and the American Flag are treated at professional football games.

The Combat Veterans For Congress subscribe to Capt Welborn’s philosophy “What We Leave Behind—Matters”. The above listed Mission Statement for the Combat Veterans For Congress PAC supports the Republican form of government that the Founding Fathers created for Americans. Obama and Hillary are disciples of Alinsky, and we do not endorse their plans to change the Republic to an intrusive and oppressive big central form of government, a Socialist form of government.

In 1787 during the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia, Benjamin Franklin was asked, “What have we got?”, he said, “A Republic, if you can keep it.” By reading our Mission Statement you will understand that we endeavor to support and “leave behind” the Free Enterprise System for the Republic, Freedom of Religion guaranteed to all Americans by the US Constitution, an educational system that teaches students to have “Pride in America,” and a strong US military that will guarantee “Peace Thru Strength.” Donald Trump Supports our Mission Statement. If you click on the below listed link, you will be able to watch a video that will tell you why we believe Donald Trump will be elected as the next US President, then please read Capt Welborn’s below listed article.

Copyright by Capt Joseph R. John. All Rights Reserved. The material can only posted on another Web site or distributed on the Internet by giving full credit to the author. It may not be published, broadcast, or rewritten without the permission from the author.

Joseph R. John, USNA ‘62
Capt USN(Ret)/Former FBI
Chairman, Combat Veterans For Congress PAC
2307 Fenton Parkway, Suite 107-184
San Diego, CA 92108

http://www.CombatVeteransForCongress.org

https://www.facebook.com/combatveteransforcongress?ref=hl

Then I heard the voice of the Lord, saying, “Whom shall I send, and who will go for Us?” Then I said, “Here am I. Send me!”
-Isaiah 6:8
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

What We Leave Behind—Matters!

By Raymond Burke Wellborn, Sr. PhD
Captain, USNA 1959, USN (Ret), N***
Dickinson, Texas 29 September 2016

It is a salient trait of our race of Homo sapiens to strive for a better life for our children. So, What We Leave Behind Matters. Pointedly, We is the operative word here for our race—in that there is only one. [Suggestion: The next time you fill in the box for “Race” do so with an ”H.”]

With that prefatory, let me introduce Eric Bolling, who is the author of “Wake Up America!” After reading his book, I just had to write a follow-on referring to it. Eric wrote that “Grit, Merit, Providence, Individualism, Thrift”—and, above all, “Pride in Our Country”—for which people around the world look to America to bolster Hope, Inspiration, and Opportunity.”

Those of us who are direct descendants of what has been called “The Greatest Generation” have a respectful obligation to leave behind A Better America for our children and their children than the “America, the Beautiful” that was passed down for us to live and prosper.

At the end of World War II, the World-Outer-Island1 essentially was the Last Man Standing, in that, the World-Island1 had been devastated by War from the nation-islands off its Western shore [the UK] to the nation-islands off its Far Eastern shore [Japan].

The inherent abilities of the people of the Outer Island, particularly in the United States of America, were tested to their limits to resupply—and help rebuild their war-wrecked countries. The USA—We, the People—stood to the fore. Yes, We profited from doing so—but, in so doing, We demonstratively proved that a Free Market—Capitalism—could prosper in a Free Country governed by the people in it WHO ARE FREE TO ELECT THE OFFICIALS THAT GOVERN THEM, a la, The Great American Experiment!

Notably, the Marshall Plan was “Foreign Aid.” Helping others around the world became the mantra for the USA. And, yes, it has cost US—We, the People—in Fortune and in Blood. Pointedly, in helping to save them, We have buried our dead heroes Over There—and are $19-trillion in Debt. But it was not all due to Foreign Aid. Needless to say, Our elected Officials did not manage Our Budget frugally. And now We need an Executive manager that can step up to the politically wreaked bar and Get Her Done. And it’s not going to be pretty.

In 1974, Dr. J. Ronald Fox of Harvard Business School published “Arming America”.in which he developed a Measure of Effectiveness [MOE] that he called “Tax-Dollar Turnover.” He defined it so as to capture how many times a tax-dollar spent today by the government was turned over to pay for the outreach of labor and material in days to come as the appropriated funds were spent for the continuation of the Planned Program.

Yes, the initial expenditure of those appropriated funds may well be non-taxable expenses—until the money gets to an entity that must claim it as income and pay taxes on it. But, along the way, those dollars may well have paid others for their contracted work.

Be that as it is, government spending is slower than the private sector. It remains, though, that Tax-Dollar-Turnover can be a Measure Of Effectiveness to depict how much that tax dollar turned over along the way to pay others for their goods and services that, in turn, stimulated the economy. So, yes, the progress for our government’s Planning Programming and Budgeting System [PPBS] is slow compared to the private sector—BUT can affect Our national economy.

Notably, some of those tax-dollar turnovers were associated with government expenditures on infrastructure enhancement that had a tax-dollar turnover of almost 2.0. Comparably, expenditures for Foreign Aid had a tax-dollar turnover of 0.85—which was less than 1.0 because of corruption. Spending appropriated funds for Arming America, a la, Defense being one of the largest “Corporations” in the world, ranged from 1.5 to 3.0. That 3.0 was for shipbuilding of a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier—comparable to building a self-sustaining city of 5,000 people…

So, Our take on government spending should be that We, the People, put OUR collective mouth where OUR collective dollars are. Then, in so doing, We should demand that those collective tax dollars be levied wisely—and spent responsibly. If not, it is within OUR purview, in having sovereign status, “to elect” someone who can, to wit:

“Government is the people’s business, and every man, woman, and child becomes a shareholder with the first penny of tax paid.”
Ronald Reagan, 1911-2004, 40th POTUS (1981- 89).

Therefore, We, the People, should demand that Our government set standards for appropriated
funds that, essentially, will invest in something that yields better than 1.5+ Tax-Dollar
Turnover. Among other things, this could be Shipbuilding. In logical substantiation of that,
consider that We live on an island nation; thus, it follows that We need ships to transport goods
for import/export. Pointedly, at the end of WWII, the USA was, in fact, the leading maritime
power in the world– and rightfully so. We also were the Arsenal of Democracy—the greatest
manufacturing base still left standing

In closing, I submit that the main problem with “Government-as-usual” is it doing more than it
should. Government’s role in most things should be overseeing, encouraging, stimulating—but
not with money. Government should have a guiding hand, not a hand-out! Moreover,
prioritizing should be in a government directive, such that—in most cases—where the country
would benefit most. But the way it has been—rather than those initiatives—that government
likes to take over and then increase taxes to meet their desired goals. Or, worse yet, go into debt
so that the “theys” can continue to spend.

What’s missing, not only for spending but for Law and Order, is Executive control—and
discipline–from a knowledgeable Leader. In Wake Up America, Eric Bolling asseverates that a
Hillary Clinton presidency would be a nightmare. I proffer that many Americans sense that
politics as usual is not working and that We, the People, need someone to champion

Capt Welborn is a Trustee for the Naval Academy Foundation. Upon graduation from the US Naval Academy, Capt Welborn was awarded the prestigious Thompson Trophy for “Outstanding Achievement in Athletics”. For all three of his varsity years, Buddy Welborn played on Navy’s Football Teams with winning seasons—-1956 (6-1-2), 1957 (9-1-1), 1958 (6-3). He was on Navy’s 1956 team that beat Notre Dame’s team (and Heisman Trophy winner Paul Hornung) 33-7 in Baltimore, and the next year he was AP’s Back of the Week for scoring all three touchdowns for Navy’s 20-7 win over Notre Dame in South Bend. He shared rushing honors on the Navy team that shut out Army (Anderson and Dawkins) 14-0 in 1957. The next season he shared rushing honors; he scored a touchdown in Navy’s 20-14 win over Michigan in the “Big House” and he shared rushing honors on the Navy team that beat Rice for the Cotton Bowl Championship in 1958.

November 1, 2016

The Little Red Hen – a little Orwellian Humour

Filed under: Political Commentary — justplainbill @ 1:29 pm

LITTLE RED HEN

Little Red Hen, a modern fable

“Who will help me plant my wheat?” asked the little red hen.

“Not I,” said the cow.

“Not I,” said the duck.

“Not I,” said the pig.

“Not I,” said the goose.

“Then I will do it by myself.” She planted her crop and the wheat grew and ripened.

“Who will help me reap my wheat?” asked the little red hen.

“Not I,” said the duck.

“Below my pay grade,” said the pig.

“I’d lose my seniority,” said the cow.

“I’d lose my unemployment compensation,” said the goose.

“Then I will do it by myself,” said the little red hen, and so she did.

“Who will help me bake the bread?” asked the little red hen.

“That would be overtime for me,” said the cow.

“I’d lose my welfare benefits,” said the duck.

“I’m a dropout and never learned how,” said the pig.

“If I’m to be the only helper, that’s discrimination,” said the goose.

“Then I will do it by myself,” said the little red hen. She baked five loaves and held them up for all of her neighbors to see. They wanted some and, in fact, demanded a share but the little red hen said, “No, I shall eat all five loaves.”

“Excess profits!” cried the cow.. (Nancy Pelosi)

“Capitalist leech!” screamed the duck. (Barbara Boxer)

“I demand equal rights!” yelled the goose. (Jesse Jackson)

The pig just grunted in disdain.. (Harry Reid)

And they all painted ‘Unfair!’ picket signs and marched around and around the little red hen, shouting obscenities.

When the farmer (Obama) came he said to the little red hen, “You must not be so greedy.”

“But I earned the bread,” said the little red hen.

“Exactly,” said Barack the farmer. “That is what makes our free enterprise system so wonderful. Anyone in the barnyard can earn as much as he wants. But under our modern government regulations, the productive workers must divide the fruits of their labor with those who are lazy and idle.”

And they all lived happily ever after, including the little red hen, who smiled and clucked, “I am grateful, for now I truly understand.”

But her neighbors became quite disappointed in her. She never again baked bread because she joined the ‘party’ and got her bread free.

And all the Democrats smiled. ‘Fairness’ had been established. Individual initiative had died but nobody noticed; perhaps no one cared so long as there was free bread that ‘the rich’ were paying for.

And perhaps….this is the end….

And the next week, there was no bread, or anything else to eat. So, they all starved equally.

EPILOGUE: Bill Clinton is getting $12 million for his memoirs. Hillary got $8 million for hers. That’s $20 million for the memories from two people, who for eight years repeatedly testified, under oath, that they couldn’t remember anything.

DO WE LIVE IN A GREAT BARNYARD OR WHAT?

Don’t forget to vote in November.

October 30, 2016

BHO, HRC, & Media Display Bigotry toward Christians, by Capt John [nc]

To
jrj@combatveteransforcongress.org
Today at 9:04 AM
Obama, Hillary, & Media Display Bigotry Toward Christians
By Capt Joseph R. John, October 30, 2016

For a political party that loves to label their opponents as bigots, it’s remarkable how bigoted the Obama administration has been for the last 8 years against Christian religious teachings and Christians in the US Armed Forces who can’t fight back. Christians who have deep religious convictions also have their well held and sincere religious beliefs with regard to abortion, homosexuality, males using girls bathrooms & showers in schools, and have their opposition to teaching very young & innocent grammar school students about homosexuality. According to former counter-terrorism training officer and American police detective George Tobias, in the below listed article, the Clinton administration would continue Obama’s bigotry toward Christians,”

The latest WikiLeaks dump of John Podesta E-mails shows that the Obama administration kept a list of high-profile Muslims it wanted to appoint to top Obama administration jobs, sub-cabinet jobs, outside boards, agencies, and policy committees. The 2008 E-mails reveal that it wasn’t enough to be Arab American, you had to be Arab and Muslim to make it onto Obama’s list.

“Many Lebanese Americans, for example, are Christian,” notes one E-mail written by Preeta Bansal, who worked on the Obama transition team headed by John Podesta. John Podesta is now Hillary Clinton’s Presidential Campaign Chairman. “In the last list (of outside boards/commissions), most who are listed appear to be Muslim American, except that a handful (where noted) may be Arab American but of an unacceptable religion (esp. Christian).”

In another indication of outright the bigotry against Christians by the Obama administration, a law suit was filed against DHS by the Heartland Alliance’s National Immigrant Justice Center, a progressive liberal advocacy organization. Heartland is “dedicated to ensuring human rights protections” for immigrants and asylum seekers—including apparently for terrorists. Heartland filed a FOIA lawsuit against the Department of Homeland Security for discriminating against Syrian and Assyrian Christian refugees for the last 5 years.

In an otherwise unremarkable opinion, obtained after filing, a Federal Freedom of Information Act request, a Federal Appellate Court Judge issued a sharp rejoinder to the Obama administration over an issue that has been written about and broadcast in the national news media. The Appellate Judge said there was almost a complete lack of Syrian Christian refugees being brought into the US—the numbers are included in the below listed article.

The lawsuit also claimed that DHS was refusing to release the identity of Tier III terrorist organizations, unlike the identities of what are defined as Tier I and Tier II terrorist organizations that are publicly identified.

Tier III terrorist organizations “tend to be groups about which the U.S. government does not have good intelligence, making it essential that [DHS] be able to obtain information about them during screening interviews that are as focused and complete as possible.” Despite the lack of information, Obama refused to let the FBI interview entering Muslim refugees to determine if they had terrorist ties

To further reveal the bigotry against Christians practiced by Obama and Hillary’s State Department the following facts are submitted. Although ten percent of the population of Syria are Syrian and Assyrian Christian, yet despite that fact, less than one-half of 1 percent of the Syrian Refugees admitted to the United States over the last 8 years were Christian. Syrian and Assyrian Christians have been in desperate need of a safe haven from ISIS Radical Islamic Terrorists who have been butchering, and slaughtering Christians for those 5 years.

ISIS has been crucifying Christians, burning them alive, drowning them in cages, beheading them, burying them alive, and making them kneel before shooting them in the back of their heads. Of the nearly 11,000 Syrian Refugees recently allowed to enter the United States by Obama, only 56 Christians were among them. The Greek Catholic Relief Agency has over 300,000 Syrian and Assyrian Christians in camps seeking entry into the US, but Obama has refused to let them enter the US for the last 5 years.

Few if any of the ISIS Radical Islamic Terrorists are being held accountable for their heinous crimes against Syrian and Assyrian Christians. Besides slaughtering Syrian and Assyrian Christians, much of Iraq’s Christian community has been ripped from their ancient ancestral homes on the Plains of Nineveh. The ISIS Radical Islamic Terrorists are also responsible for the destruction of their Christians’ cultural heritage symbols in their churches, ancient bibles, 2000 year old Christian churches, and Assyrian Christian monasteries. However, while Obama frets over Islamophobia, hardly anything is said about the horrors faced by the defenseless followers of Jesus Christ.

So while the Obama administration has brought in over 900,000+ Middle East Muslim Refugees into the US, and has resettled them in 187 cities throughout the United States, much less than ½ of 1 percent of the entering refugees were Christians. Obama has been concealing basic information about the entering Muslim refugees, behind a wall of government secrecy, and at the same time refusing to let the FBI interview entering Muslim refugees to determine if they have terrorist ties,

The 900,000+ Middle East Muslim Refugees that have been resettled throughout the US, without strict instruction to the resettling agencies not to inform elected local & state officials and their law enforcement agencies where those refugees are being placed. Despite the fact that the Syrian refugee crisis is the catalyst that was responsible for the infiltration ISIS Radical Islamic Terrorists into Western Europe, resulting in many murderous Radical Islamic Terrorist attacks against unsuspecting Europeans. ISIS has openly bragged that the terrorists that they trained, would also be infiltrated into the United States.

Obama is threatening to veto the current Military Budget passed by Congress that is currently sitting on his desk awaiting his signature, because it protects Christians religious beliefs. Obama wants the absolute freedom to discriminate against Christian social service providers who interact with the government—all because many of those religious organizations are unable to endorse the LGBT cause, because of their well held religious teachings and beliefs. The Russell Amendment in the budget, authored by an endorsed Combat Veteran For Congress, Cong Steve Russell. LTC-USA (Ret) (R-OK-5), merely reaffirms the protection of Christians and Jewish members of the military, while clarifying that religious organizations (Jewish and Christian) have a right to employ people committed to authentically live and operate in accordance with their faith tenets. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act already specifically protects a religious organizations’ ability to hire based on religion. In short, Christian and Jewish religious organizations are free to be religious organizations.

Obama’s previously violated the Religious Freedom of Chaplins who were refused the right to read letters to their congregations from the pulpit from their Cardinals (the very reason why the Pilgrims left England and migrated to America in 1620). That restriction imposed by Obama, not only violates the Chaplin’s Freedom of Religion, it also a violates their Freedom of Speech. When it comes to sexual orientation and gender identity policies Obama’s restrictions of the religious beliefs of members of the US Armed Forces is egregious. Obama is the first occupant of the Oval Office to refuse to guarantee Religious Freedom for members of the US Armed Forces.

By clicking on the below listed link, you will be able to watch a video of Dinesh D’Souza, who was a Keynote Speaker at one of the Combat Veterans For Congress Patriotic Gala Events, defend Christianity from Obama’s oppression. Dinesh provides his “Words of Wisdom to Christians”, and details Obama’s and Hillary’s opposition to Freedom of Religion.


Copyright by Capt Joseph R. John. All Rights Reserved. The material can only posted on another Web site or distributed on the Internet by giving full credit to the author. It may not be published, broadcast, or rewritten without the permission from the author.

Joseph R. John, USNA ‘62
Capt USN(Ret)/Former FBI
Chairman, Combat Veterans For Congress PAC
2307 Fenton Parkway, Suite 107-184
San Diego, CA 92108

http://www.CombatVeteransForCongress.org

https://www.facebook.com/combatveteransforcongress?ref=hl

Then I heard the voice of the Lord, saying, “Whom shall I send, and who will go for Us?” Then I said, “Here am I. Send me!”
-Isaiah 6:8
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
NewsWithViews.com
OBAMA, HILLARY AND MEDIA DISPLAY BIGOTRY AGAINST MIDDLE EASTERN CHRISTIANS
By Jim Kouri, CPP
September 7, 2016
President Barack Obama and his hopeful successor Hillary Clinton are continuing their open-door policy to Muslim refugees fleeing the turmoil in Syria, Iraq and other regions, but a number of American Christian organizations claim the two Democrat leaders have shown less sympathy for Syrian and Iraqi Christians.

In fact, of the 10,801 brought into the United States by the end of September, only 56 of them are listed as Christians (see numerical breakdown below). The vast majority of the Muslims are part of the Sunni sect, which is the one represented by the likes of Al Q’ida, Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), Al-Shabaab (Somalia) and others.
Religious Denomination Number of Refugees
Catholic 12
Christian 29
Greek Orthodox 1
Jehovah Witness 4
Muslim (unspecified) 90
Muslim (Shiite) 20
Muslim (Sunni) 10,612
No Religion 1
Orthodox 6
Other 5
Protestant 4
Yazidi 17

Religious denominations of the 10,801 Syrian Refuges who have been admitted into the United States since the Obama Administration’s announced plan to admit a n additional 11,000 Syrian refugees for FY2016 on September 10, 2015. Source: -Refugee Processing Center

“For a political party that loves to label their opponents as bigots, it’s remarkable how bigoted the current administration is and how bigoted the Clinton administration will continue to be against Christians,” said former counter-terrorism training officer and American police detective George Tobiaso.

According to several news reports from outlets in the United States and Europe, more than 70 mass graves were discovered in Iraq and Syria containing thousands of decaying bodies killed by the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) and other Islamic terrorist groups who buried the victims of their atrocities.

As many as 15,000 victims — men, women and children — slaughtered during the occupation of towns and villages by ISIS, a group known for executing Christians, may be buried in the sites across territory that was occupied by ISIS, Al Nusra Front or other radical Muslims.

According to the Homeland Security News Wire, “The [Associated Press] used satellite imagery, photos, and interviews, to find the location of seventeen mass graves in Syria and sixteen mass graves in Iraq – although the latter are in areas still too dangerous to excavate. AP says from 5,200 to more than 15,000 ISIS victims are buried in the graves it knows about.”

Few if any are being held accountable for the heinous crimes. Besides the killings, much of Iraq’s Christian community have been ripped from their ancestral homes in Nineveh. The jihadists are also responsible for the destruction of Christians’ cultural heritage. However, while Obama frets over Islamophobia, hardly anything is said about the horrors being faced by followers of Jesus Christ.

Many more mass graves may be found once Isis retreats after losing ground outside of Iraqi cities of Mosul and Raqqa which remain under jihadists’ control.

According to the watchdog group that’s known for its accuracy and diligence: Earlier this year Judicial Watch uncovered State Department records confirming that “Arab extremists” are entering the U.S. through Mexico with the assistance of smuggling network “cells.”

© 2016 Jim Kouri- All Rights Reserved

________________________________________
Jim Kouri, CPP is currently fifth vice-president of the National Association of Chiefs of Police. He’s former chief at a New York City housing project in Washington Heights nicknamed “Crack City” by reporters covering the drug war in the 1980s. He’s also served on the National Drug Task Force and trained police and security officers throughout the country.
He writes for many police and crime magazines including Chief of Police, Police Times, The Narc Officer, Campus Law Enforcement Journal, and others. He’s appeared as on-air commentator for over 100 TV and radio news and talk shows including Oprah, McLaughlin Report, CNN Headline News, MTV, Fox News, etc. His book Assume The Position is available at Amazon.Com, Booksamillion.com, and can be ordered at local bookstores.

October 26, 2016

wikileaks key to current leaks – Ya got a ? on how bad Hillary really is, the answer is here, look it up

Filed under: Anti-American Politicians — Tags: , , , , , , — justplainbill @ 8:01 pm

To ‘Chuck McDougald, PhD (Green Beret)’
Today at 11:07 AM

The below listed WikiLeaks E-mails should get very wide distribution thru your own extensive networks, There are so many E-mails that indict Hillary Clinton’s criminal actions, reveals Hillary’s intention to keep the southern border wide open which is a danger to the National Security of the United States, shows Hillary couldn’t handle the security for a 13 acre US Mission in Benghazi (turning the security of the US over to Hillary would be a disaster), shows Hillary putting America on the auction block for donations to the Clinton Foundation (pay to play), shows Hillary lied to the American people in public while saying what she would really do in private, shows Hillary was the architect & negotiator for the dangerous Iranian Nuclear Weapons Agreement that is giving Iran nuclear weapons, etc.

The below listed WikiLeaks E-mails demonstrates that Hillary Clinton and George Soros are a “clear and present danger” to:

1. The survival of the Free Enterprise System in the United States

2. The survival of the nation’s Judeo-Christian religious way of life that is under attack by progressives

3. The continued integrity US Constitution given to the American people by the Founding Fathers

4. The continued selection of members of the US Supreme Court who will not legislate from the bench

5. The right of every Americans to own and bear arms as guaranteed to them by the 2nd Amendment

6. The US Justice System that has been corrupted by the Attorney General of the United States, Hillary Clinton, and Director of the FBI

7. The US Armed Forces whose “Combat Effectiveness” and strength has been hallowed out over the last 8 years by Obama and inept Congress

8. America’s Health Care System, Socialized by the failed ObamaCare Program, had premiums spiked by 25%, 45%, 53 %, 69%,116% in various states

Kindly click on the below listed link to listen to Pat Condell, one of Europe’s most astute political commentators, he weighed in on the US Presidential race with only 2 weeks to go to the election—every American should listen to Pat Condell’s in depth and magnificent evaluation of the race

http://www.patcondell.net/americas-moment-of-truth/

Respectfully,

Joe

Joseph R. John, USNA ‘62

Capt USN(Ret)/Former FBI

Regional Chairman Veterans 4 Trump, Southern California (Orange County, Imperial County, and San Diego County)

2307 Fenton Parkway, Suite 107-184

San Diego, CA 92108

Then I heard the voice of the Lord, saying, “Whom shall I send, and who will go for Us?” Then I said, “Here am I. Send me!”
-Isaiah 6:8

Here’s a great spread sheet of all the wikileaks:

https://docs.google.com/ spreadsheets/d/ 1DgwLHAC5mk9Ghblc6O7AXzxX5dNLl Mg0hHUn-D_Ay7I/htmlview

Primary

· Wikileaks Index

· Important HRC Corruption Videos

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

J

1

WIKILEAK INDEX

Messages:

SI – Self incrim

CF – Clint Found

OVS – Offensive Voter Statemen

2

CTR

FP – Forgn Pol

DTC – Trump

3

ID#

EMAIL#

SUBJECT

LINK

WIKILEAK DUMP#

MC – media coll

BS – Bernie

OTR – Other

4

BS

Bernie Campaign Sabotage

5

BS1

1193

>Massive Clinton ‘hits’ file on Bernie & http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/10/10/wikileaks-podesta-email-release-reveals-massive-clinton-hits-file-on-sanders.html

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/1193

BS

20

6

BS2

2953

>Nothing more counter-productive than asking for Bernie’s medical records. Is David Brock a plant?

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/2953

MC

122

7

BS3

3023

Donna Brazile, now the current DNC chairwoman & replacement for Debbie Wasserman Shultz (who was forced to resign because of being anti-Bernie/Pro-Clinton), leaked insider Bernie Sander’s campaign information to Hillary’s staff:

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3023#efmAMFAMSAM-ANBAOIAOhAOiAPV

SI

226

8

BS4

3188

Bernie supporters are bed wetters

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3188

CTR

4

9

BS5

3609

Shitting on a Bernie super delegate, threaten to cut off funding

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3609

DTC

7

10

BS6

3990

>Hillary should stop attacking Bernie, especially when she says things that are untrue, which candidly she often does.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3990

CF

40

11

BS7

5423

>‘Bitching’ Bernie Voters. Dems planned to fool Sanders supporters at convention. ‘His people will think they’ve won something’ & http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/oct/12/dems-planned-fool-sanders-supporters-convention/ & http://www.infowars.com/wikileaks-clinton-surrogates-wanted-to-fool-bitching-bernie-voters-into-supporting-hillary/

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/5423

OVS

11

12

BS8

5423

Concessions given to Bernie Sanders & his supporters were a false illusion of a victory for Bernie’s “self righteous ideologies”. Clinton Advisor: “Bernie and his people have been bitching about super delegates” “Throw Bernie a bone…[…]….his people will think they’ve “won” something from the Party Establishment. It doesn’t make a difference. We don’t lose”:

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/5423#efmAMyAPDAoKAqBAshAs8AzAA2x

OTR

36

13

BS9

5616

7 months before Hillary earns nomination over Bernie Sanders, Donna Brazile pledges to John Podesta that “as soon as (Hillary’s) nomination is wrapped up. I will be your biggest surrogate” “Look forward to working with you to elect the first woman President of the United States” says Podesta:

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/5616#efmACTADd

FP

11

14

BS10

8248

Clinton staff discusses Hillary only supporting a carbon tax to knock Bernie Sanders out of the primaries: “To be clear: it’s lethal in the general, so I don’t want to support one. But don’t want to give bernie contrast right now.”:

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/8248#efmAAGAHu

15

BS11

10669

“We are going to need his voters to turn out in November for HRC, [Bernie] won’t be nominated.” {dated 2015-07-01; DNC was July 2016} & Strategy to run only positive ads to screw Bernie later

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/10669

16

BS12

11580

11580 Brent Budowsky writes to podesta 2016 February : “In the last 48 hours a) Hillary and her campaign have begun to question Bernie’s integrity and b) older feminists are beginning a civil war against younger women with idiot comments such as younger women support Bernie to get laid. What would be the reaction if Bill Clinton, George Bush or Harry Reid comments such as this? Or that younger women must support Hillary for the sole reason that she is a woman? Team Clinton has no idea the danger they are causing of creating such an intense antipathy towards Hillary that many Bernie supporters and younger women will not vote for her in November. I had coffee today with a female college senior who is an intern with the Obama administration—the daughter of a Democrat who has worked for senior Democrats who asked me to look after her while she is in Washington, who told me “I just hate her so much I might even vote for a Republican but I will never vote for her.” And she doesn’t even support Bernie.”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/11580#efmAAGAPF

17

BS13

12278

– almost amusing and mouth frothing. “Senator Sanders has been pressed on this vote in every Democratic debate. And the truth is, even Hillary Clinton has cast votes she later said she regretted. So I’d understand if Senator Sanders would just stand up and say, “I got this one wrong. I made a mistake. I’m sorry.”….. And until he changes his position on immunity for gun sellers and gun makers, Senator Sanders is wrong on gun safety. And he’s the wrong candidate for President”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12278

18

BS14

15464

John Podesta calls Bernie a doofus.
“Thanks Neera. Can you believe that doofus Bernie attacked it? Ben happy?”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/15464

19

BS15

15615

THE ENTIRE VP SHORTLIST (notice poor Bernie at the bottom of a very long list, he never had a shot) edit: apparently divided into “food groups” (Podesta’s words) by race and gender lmao. Fucking liberals.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/15616

20

BS16

21823

Their Books on Bernie Sanders (see attachments) – hundreds of pages

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/21823

21

BS17

21908

Robby Mook calls De Blasio a “terrorist” for saying nice things about Bernie.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/21908

22

BS18

22224

In this one, the campaign conspires to have a group of women senators privately confront Bernie about running a negative campaign so they can leak the meeting to the press to shape their preferred narrative that Bernie is a sexist who is running a negative campaign.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/22224

23

BS19

22262

Podesta Calls Bernie Supporters “paranoid internet dwellers”

Podesta wrote:
>This is good stuff for paranoid internet dwellers. Did Bernie ever say a word about this?

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/22262

24

BS20

22405

HRC campaign making fun of Bernie

>That’s because the billionaaaaaahhhs own the media

https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/22405

25

BS21

23508

Neera Tanden: “he’s really hung up on Obama not caring about black people”

-speaking to Podesta about Ben Jealous potentially endorsing Sanders – which he eventually did.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/23508

26

BS22

23991

EMAILD Judd Legum to John Podesta

“Not sure how it’s playing out on your end but having been seeing a lot of negative stuff online about the single payer hit on Bernie. See it being fit into the she’s dishonest/will say anything to win frame. So I just wanted you to make sure you were cognizant of that.”

John Podesta responds about Bernie’s healthcare proposal.

“Thx. His actual proposal sucks, but we live in a leftie alternative universe”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/23991

27

BS23

25203

HRC CAMPAIGN MAJOR PLAYERS SAYING SOMETHING WILL BE “VERY ROUGH”

John Podesta wrote:

Thx Donna. Time to buckle up.

From: *Donna Brazile*
Date: Tuesday, February 2, 2016
Subject: Good luck tonight.
To: John Podesta

Shake things up.
It’s going to be rough. Very rough.

NON-WIKILEAKS ANALYSIS
That was a caucus day where Hillary only won by .5% against Bernie. So the delegates ended up being pretty much split down the middle.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/25203

28

BS24

25301

Seems like someone here made the mistake of defecting to the Bernie camp.

Subject: Re: Faiz advising Bernie

Podesta: Yes. Gave him a very hard time. I have to say this does not go down easy with me. Wish him well in life.

Tanden: He’s a fucker.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/25301

29

BS25

25301

EMAILID 25301 Neera Tanden (star of Podesta part 14 (https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/58ppna/podesta_emails_part_14_wikileaks_emailid_23605/ ) with her “Fuck those assholes” ( https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/58ppna/podesta_emails_part_14_wikileaks_emailid_23605/) comments said about the New York Times) writes about information she gained from Judd Legum

“Faiz advising Bernie. I think it’s just kind of informal for now but he’s like writing speeches and stuff or at least speech language.”

Neera adds directly addressing Podesta about Faiz’s conduct:

“you know about this? Jesus Makes sense since all these freaks after Hillary are like his spawn.”

Podesta responds to this betrayal (someone daring to give advice to Bernie Sanders): “Yes. Gave him a very hard time. I have to say this does not go down easy with me. Wish him well in life.”

Finally Neera just responds about Faiz :
“He’s a fucker”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/25301

30

CF

Clinton Foundation

31

CF1

1127

Clinton Foundation tied to uranium deal

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/1127

32

CF2

1518

>Clinton Camp worried as Chelsea hosts “fundraiser” aka Cash payment for Radical Islamic Group that wants to end Israel & https://twitter.com/trump2016fan/status/786762646863224837

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/1518

33

CF3

2301

Bill Clinton is damaging for Hillary:

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/2301

34

CF4

2425

Connects him to Magnetar Capital of which, Ross Laser is a founder. It’s a hedge fund organization that might have contributed to the 2007-2010 housing market crash. Apparently, Ross is a donor but don’t know if there’s anything else there

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/2425

35

CF5

2485

Donor amounts including Soros

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/2485

36

CF6

3774

Intelligence Reports Show SA and Qatar provide ISIL Support

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3774

37

CF7

4492

Clinton Foundation has no internal audits

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4492

38

CF8

6009

Clinton foundation Exceeded its original authorization from the I.R.S

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/6009

39

CF9

6296

Connects him to Magnetar Capital of which, Ross Laser is a founder. It’s a hedge fund organization that might have contributed to the 2007-2010 housing market crash. Apparently, Ross is a donor but don’t know if there’s anything else there

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/6296

40

CF10

6775

Unless Sheikh Mo has sent us a $6 million check, this sounds crazy to do.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/6775#efmACoADwAIqAJzAOXASM

41

CF11

6866

Indian business man donating who owns hospitals in India, pay to play?

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/6866

42

CF12

6900

(older leak) Warning about visuals on Hati CF Donations and Mining contracts conflict of interest

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/6900

43

CF13

7250

CGI meeting with attachments

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/7250

44

CF14

7414

Foundation needs to be low key in 2016

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/7414

45

CF15

8160

Juicy Juicy foundation review(falsely labeled audit) of 2012 calls for ending conflicts of interest of staff look at attachement

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/8160

46

CF16

8396

>Bill Clinton receives a million dollar birthday check from Qatar & https://twitter.com/AmyMek/status/786774862371184640

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/8396

47

CF17

8396

$1million dollars from qatar to WJC for 5minute meeting. Also talk about rwanda attracting mining investors through the Clinton Global Initiative.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/8396

48

CF18

9088

Clinton Foundation”to me audit sounds bad, as if we started this with bad intentions”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9088

49

CF19

9200

Communication with WJC (Bill)

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9200

50

CF20

9388

MORE PAY TO PLAY

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9388#efmAWoAaB

51

CF21

9422

Saudi Donations

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9442#efmAUJAXqAv0A1HBHPBJwBQTBUg

52

CF22

9570

c3 / c4 money involves Soros.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9570

53

CF23

10227

Foundation donor stuff (handling donors 500,000 or greater)

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/10227

54

CF24

11480

Discussing Bill Clinton attending a summit in Panama. Concerns that he will be seen by the press

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/11480

55

CF25

12112

In attachments there are names and salaries of CF and other Clinton entities workers

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12112

56

CF26

12251

CF/CHAI Investment fund and advisory board. “It would be hard to imagine a worse idea than ira magaziner running an > investment fund of any kind not to mention one under this scenario > > Good luck with this”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12251

57

CF27

12401

EMAILID 12401 This seems big. Chelsea Clinton provides a list of concerns to the staff including John Podesta. Apparently several cases of surveillance and spying was going on between the employees. All of the names of persons will need to be identified and followed up on. There is a lot of information in just this one email: “Ilya physically saw/caught Justin a couple of days ago reading his bberry and loading the same spyware onto his computer that he loaded onto Bari’s computer” “- my father was told today of explicit examples at CGI of Doug/ Teneo pushing for – and receiving – free memberships – and of multiple examples of Teneo ‘hustling’ business at CGI – and of people now having quit at CGI” “- Ilya believes Hannah and Justin have taken significant sums of money from my parents personally – some in expenses – cars, etc. – and others directly”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12401#efmAXHAZp

58

CF28

12401

Problems at Clinton Foundation in 2011:

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12401

59

CF29

12401

EMAILID 12401 This seems big. Chelsea Clinton provides a list of concerns to the staff including John Podesta. Apparently several cases of surveillance and spying was going on between the employees. All of the names of persons will need to be identified and followed up on. There is a lot of information in just this one email: “Ilya physically saw/caught Justin a couple of days ago reading his bberry and loading the same spyware onto his computer that he loaded onto Bari’s computer” “- my father was told today of explicit examples at CGI of Doug/ Teneo pushing for – and receiving – free memberships – and of multiple examples of Teneo ‘hustling’ business at CGI – and of people now having quit at CGI” “- Ilya believes Hannah and Justin have taken significant sums of money from my parents personally – some in expenses – cars, etc. – and others directly”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12401#efmAXHAZp

60

CF30

12401

Some guy named “Justin” (Justin Cooper. He was the only Clinton IT guy who didn’t take the fifth in front of congress. Sonetear(Combetta) was there and fiffed, BPags skipped the hearing. ) is a mole in the Clinton Foundation who has been reading everyone’s emails and loading spyware on their computers

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12401

61

CF31

12401

EMAILID 12401: Chelsea addressing the team about concerns re: Clinton Foundation

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12401

62

CF32

12830

CF not spending money on what they said they use it for…
>I’m sensitive to that (which is why I’m asking) but those CHAI Stats are on nearly every public listing of CF accomplishment. I’m want to make people think twice about calls for dropping grants to CF or return the money and the HIV/AIDS work hits home in a way that other stats don’t. Plus it’s international work. I’m concerned about saying we used money to fund healthy schools (because we didn’t use the funding for that).

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12830

63

CF33

15400

Chelsea Clinton says Doug Band and Justin Cooper support Bill “in his political work and not at all on his foundation work.” Even though Band was on the board of directors of the Clinton Foundation.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/15400

64

CF34

15416

Talking about calling Gowdy to get “a sense of where we are”??

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/15416

65

CF35

21670

From:JPalmieri@americanprogress.org To: john.podesta@gmail.com Date: 2008-07-31 18:24 Subject: FW: The person I most want to spend time with

seriously? this is the worst subject line ever in an email from Bill Clinton.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/21670

66

CF36

21888

Clinton Foundation: Swedish money islands, Pension fiasco details

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/21888

67

CF37

21978

From: Doug Band “Also I signed a conflict of interest policy as a board member of cgi On it, I wrote that my wife designs bags for cgi, and loses money doing so plus donating her time And that teneo represents 4 cgi sponsors, 3 of which teneo brought to cgi . Oddly, wjc does not have to sign such a document even though he is personally paid by 3 cgi sponsors, gets many expensive gifts from them, some that are at home etc I could add 500 different examples of things like this and while I removed lasry bc they are all on the offense, I get the sense that they are trying to put some sort of wrong doing on me after the audit as a crutch to change things and if I don’t mention things like lasry where they all have issues, I may regret it”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/21978

68

CF38

21978

Doug Band, who was Clinton’s body man while he was in the WH and the guy who practically invented the Clinton Foundation, says this about Bill, who apparently did not have to sign a conflict of interest policy document like the rest of the Clinton Foundation board:

“he is personally paid by 3 cgi sponsors, gets many expensive gifts from them, some that are at home, etc.”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/21978

69

CF39

22030

HRC pay to play with King of Morocco & making a “mess” of foreign policy

From:huma@hrcoffice.com To: robbymook2015@gmail.com, john.podesta@gmail.com

Just to give you some context, the condition upon which the Moroccans agreed to host the meeting was her participation. If hrc was not part if it, meeting was a non-starter.
CGI also wasn’t pushing for a meeting in Morocco and it wasn’t their first choice.
This was HRC’s idea, our office approached the Moroccans and they 100 percent believe they are doing this at her request. The King has personally committed approx $12 million both for the endowment and to support the meeting.
It will break a lot of china to back out now when we had so many opportunities to do it in the past few months.
She created this mess and she knows it.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/22030#efmABAADKADLADiAEeAExAFbAH_AJwAKXAOWAO2

70

CF40

23539

Jennifer Palmieri writes about how Bill Clinton should refuse to answer the press on a few subjects

We recommend not engaging on specific questions related to 1) donors; 2) implementation of the MOU; or 3) HRC’s knowledge of donors to the Foundation. These are rabbit holes. Press want us to go deeper into these subjects to try to get us to introduce more facts which will lead to more questions and give the story more life.

It is very clear that Clinton staffers do not want the press or the voters to gain access to “more facts”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/23539#efmAQJAVU

71

CF41

24440

CLINTON FOUNDATION SCHEMED WITH BIG PHARMA TO KEEP THE PRICE OF AIDS DRUGS HIGH IN AMERICA (https://archive.fo/G1q8s) (TLDR. http://imgur.com/a/Dcdmx)

When the Clintons are questioned about the obvious sketchiness of their foundation, they routinely cite AIDS work. But the AIDS work is carried out by CHAI (“Clinton Health Access Initiative”), a separate organization.

In one angry fax (https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/13278), Ira Magaziner, the head of CHAI, says the Clinton Foundation would have 40% overhead if they left out CHAI from the statistics (see pg.10 of attachment). The Clintons conflate these two organizations and they know it. Here (https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/10977)is an email from Podesta where he admits he, “mixed CHAI and CF together” on a television appearance defending the foundation. Tina Flournoy, an aide to Bill Clinton, worried (https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12410) that the foundation was constantly “using CHAI stats.” Craig Minassian, an employee of the Clinton Foundation, dismissed (https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12410) those concerns by noting “the HIV/AIDS work hits home in a way that other stats don’t.”

But now, with this new email ( https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/24440 ), reveals the true nature of CHAI’s work. CHAI contracted with Big Pharma companies for AIDS drugs to be distributed in developing countries. This contract specified that AIDS drugs would be provided for a significant discount to CHAI. Getting the drugs at a large discount acts like a direct donation to CHAI. The Clintons reap all of the PR benefits which they use to defend themselves. Otherwise the Clintons would have no defense when the issue of the Clinton Foundation corruption is raised.

But why is this arrangement beneficial for Big Pharma? They could easily distribute drugs to the developing world themselves. Many pharma companies already have programs where they tightly monitor and control the distribution of drugs (REMS) (http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/rems/) and programs that allow them to distribute to the less fortunate (Pfizer Rx Assistance Programs) (http://www.pfizer.com/health/financial_assistance_programs/patient_assistance_programs). Why then, do they need to go through the Clintons?

Corrupt Bargain

The answer, laid out for the first time in this email, is that the Pharma companies relied on the Clintons to resist efforts to lower the costs of AIDS drugs in the United States, the world’s most lucrative drug market. They enable CHAI to do and claim credit for running a massive AIDS drug program, in exchange they expect high drug prices in the United States.

• The Clintons get the positive press for running a large drug program with CHAI from the cheap drugs from the companies.
• The Pharma companies get a political machine to preserve their ability to fleece the American consumer.
• Since the insurance companies mostly pay for these drugs, the American consumer barely notices.
• And everyone else, even those without AIDS, just pay higher insurance premiums to offset this expense. The costs are distributed throughout the population via the insurance industry.

Smoking Gun Email
The email is a reaction to “comments President Clinton made on lowering domestic AIDS drugs prices at the World AIDS day event” that must have set off a firestorm within Clinton world. Ira notes that CHAI was “taken by surprise” and “wish[ed] that someone had consulted with us before he made these comments.” He explains:

“we think that publicly pressuring the US and European AIDS drug companies to lower prices and bringing pressure to allow generic AIDS drugs into the United States will have limited if any success and could seriously jeopardize our negotiations to continually lower prices in poor countries. …

We have always told the drug companies that we would not pressure them and create a slippery slope where prices they negotiate with us for poor countries would inevitably lead to similar prices in rich countries. If we were going to change our view on this, we should have informed the companies before President Clinton went public with his statement and attempted to negotiate a way for them to participate in and get credit for whatever steps we could have persuaded them to take to help the crisis in the states.

Since President Clinton’s comments were made, we have been contacted by a number of advocacy groups who are now intending to wage a public campaign to bring in generics and lower drug prices. We do not feel we can participate in this without jeopardizing our work around the world. We cannot oppose what they might do, but we also cannot be publicly supporting it either.This campaign will not get started until January, so we have some time to figure out and act upon our own strategy.”

Having laid out the damage, Ira turns to mitigation strategies:
“If we do try to do something in this area, we suggest that we approach the innovator companies that can currently sell products in the US with the idea of making donations to help clear the ADAP lists. For a variety of reasons, the companies will likely favor a donation approach rather than one that erodes prices across the board. …”

What reason(s) could there possibly be beyond simple profit maximization?
“… I would guess that they would also likely favor a solution that involved their drugs rather than an approach that allowed generic drugs from India to flood the US market at low prices or one that set a precedent of waiving patent laws on drugs. … We can go to war with the US drug companies if President Clinton would like to do so, but we would not suggest it.”
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/24440#efmAZwAcGAePAgkAizAj9

Summary
CHAI freely admits there is an implicit agreement with the drug companies not to pressure them to lower domestic prices. Bill Clinton made comments that added pressure. CHAI receives a great amount of positive publicity for their AIDS work abroad, and the comments jeopardize that program. Here, CHAI admits it is in their interests for US AIDS drug prices to remain high, so that they can continue getting credit for keeping them low abroad.

But CHAI is not content with simply fleecing American AIDS sufferers. Since CHAI doesn’t want pressure on Pharma companies to linger, they propose to torpedo other AIDS advocacy groups by creating a smaller, watered-down domestic program with the Pharma companies before those other advocacy groups begin their assault in January.

The Clintons are only out for themselves. In comments on World AIDS day in the subsequent years of 2012 (http://archive.is/mg2cp) and 2013 (http://archive.is/RRBBz), Bill says nothing whatsoever about domestic drug prices. If AIDS advocacy groups cannot trust the Clintons not to stab them in the back, how can the American people?

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/24440

72

CF42

25201

EMAILD A Clinton Global Initiative(CGI) executive asks a meeting from Podesta. Apparently he has to justify why he wants the meeting in a long email. He wants to discuss the future of CGI:

“it is imperative that we formulate an answer to the question whether CGI can and will exist beyond 2016 if Secretary Clinton becomes the next President.”

Apparently he is concerned that the end of CGI may be in sight. Maybe it will not be needed any more as a campaign asset? Or the conflict of interests will be too big to ignore?

“1) In its current form, CGI’s existence depends on President Clinton’s active and visible participation as the convener. 2) The economic viability of CGI depends on its ability to attract members and sponsors to support the enterprise.”

Bill Clinton must keep working on CGI to remain viable.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/25201#efmAPbAR3

73

CF43

25737

CLINTON FOUNDATION DR WAS HEAD OF EBOLA EFFORTS IN LIBERIA. CF STOOD TO MAKE A LOT OF MONEY BEING THE MIDDLE MAN, JUST LIKE THEY DID IN HAITI

From: “Walter T. Gwenigale”
Subject: Re: ebola plan
Date: September 13, 2014 at 5:45:14 AM EDT
To: “James Tomarken”

“Thanks, Jim, for getting to me yourself. If implemented, your proposal will be a great help to us. Dr. Moses Massaquoi, the head of the Clinton Foundation in the Ministry of Health & Social Welfare here in Liberia, is actively involved with the management of the Ebola incidence and heads the “case management (treatment)”team. I will pass your suggestions to him and Hon. Tolbert Nyenswah, the Chair of the “Ebola Incidence Management System” and get back to you very soon.
Walter”

TOTAL PLEDGED AND ACTUAL DONATIONS TO THE EBOLA EFFORTS
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/ebola/11179135/What-countries-have-pledged-to-fight-Ebola…-and-how-much-theyve-paid-into-the-fund.html

‘$18.8 million (£11.7 million) from Britain and more than $200 million (£124.5 million) from the US.”
GOOD CHARTS IN THIS ARTICLE

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/25737

74

CF44

25770

lawyers talking about not getting their money for their Clinton Foundation Haiti job.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/25770

75

CF45

25770

Clinton Foundation not paying for the services they received for more than a year. This is related to the “looting of Haiti” case where the “Friends of Bill” list was created in the State Department. Chelsea complains:

“My friend Eric was the partner who led the work McKinsey did pro bono + expenses for the CF/ CBHF and the IHRC in Haiti for more than a year and their expenses have not yet been paid.”

Eric, the friend wants to get paid but doesn’t dare to tell his bosses because the info might leak out and it would be embarrassing if the press found out about this.

“I think he’s a bit at wits end and also doesn’t want to run it up the flag pole at McKinsey to attract any undesired attention.”

Meme version ( https://i.sli.mg/hgJyj5.png)

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/25770#efmADXAFGAHrAJq

76

CF46

26101

Concerns that Hillary will be the presedent and that she will be “most unfriendly to Israel…. worse than Obama.”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/26101

77

CF47

26121

HRC AND WJC TOLD TO DECLINE FOREIGN DONATIONS ASAP BY THEIR OWN CAMPAIGN!

“John, some free advice, good advice. Clinton Foundation should cut off foreign donations ASAP. Inevitably will happen anyway, they should get it off the table now. Not only because of the intrinsic issue, but it would be good for the Clintons to get in the habit of cutting off downside risks of any kind. You do not need me to tell you, before this campaign is done, it will not be pretty. I will not publicly call for this, but this is my advice to you and them……Brent”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/26121

78

CF48

—-

Clinton Foundation Accepts tens of millions of dollars from SA and Qatar

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/21/us/politics/hillary-clinton-presidential-campaign-charity.html

79

CTR

Correct the Record

80

CTR1

7005

David Brock resignation but now runs Correct The Record

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/7005

81

CTR2

16024

EMAILID 16024 re47 and cbaker agree to put the former Governor of Michigan, Jennifer Granholm on the CTR paylist as an official CTR shill. This seems necessary because they want to start paying out money to her immediately. After a while they will move her to another “vehicle” (slush fund?), to draw salary from somewhere else. CTR is Correct The Record, a super PAC, most known for massive shill campaigns, using paid posters on social media like Reddit and Facebook, funded by millions of dollars. I explored with Marc what the limitations would be on HFA’s use of Governor Granholm if she were paid by Correct the Record. As a threshold matter we could not call her a spokesman for the campaign or schedule her directly. We would be able to refer groups or media to her if they are looking for a non-campaign, third part surrogate, the same way we might refer them to the DNC Chair or Stephanie Schriock. For example this weekend she spoke at the Ohio State Party dinner. If she were at Correct the Record we could at least make sure her speaking and media opportunities met our needs/requests. Finally, as a person paid by CTR she could not solicit donations for the campaign. She could be at CTR for a period and move to some other vehicle (New York – or Michigan- state party, DNC, HFA) at any point (i.e. there is no waiting period).

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/16024

82

CTR3

16024

I explored with Marc what the limitations would be on HFA’s use of Governor Granholm if she were paid by Correct the Record. As a threshold matter we could not call her a spokesman for the campaign or schedule her directly. We would be able to refer groups or media to her if they are looking for a non-campaign, third part surrogate, the same way we might refer them to the DNC Chair or Stephanie Schriock. For example this weekend she spoke at the Ohio State Party dinner. If she were at Correct the Record we could at least make sure her speaking and media opportunities met our needs/requests. Finally, as a person paid by CTR she could not solicit donations for the campaign. She could be at CTR for a period and move to some other vehicle (New York – or Michigan- state party, DNC, HFA) at any point (i.e. there is no waiting period).

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/16024

83

CTR4

20102

CTR talking points for January 2015. CTR is Correct the Record, a super PAC mostly known for hiring paid posters, shills to post pro-Hillary content on Reddit and Facebook. The goal of such an operation is to create an illusion of organic support for Hillary. This roundup will be possibly useful in the future to identify senior CTR accounts by comparing what they posted to the contents of this email, since most CTR employees only started posting much closer to the election than January 2015.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/20102

84

DTC

Donald Trump Campaign

85

DTC1

3599

Clinton strategist: We need to “produce an unaware and compliant citizenry” to defeat Trump:

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3599#efmARKATm

86

DTC2

4518

Hillary campaign desperate to generate fake “USA!” chants, calls Trump supporters “angry white guys”:

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4518

87

DTC3

4664

Clinton campaign and the New York Times coordinating attack strategy against Trump:

https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4664

88

DTC4

5774

Call to undermine Trump by accusing him of big brother plans.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/5774

89

DTC5

7273

“…Trump is change of historic size…”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/7273

90

DTC6

21792

David Brock (founded Correct the Record) ups the budget when The Donald is the apparent nominee

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/21792

91

DTC7

21792

Brock now thinks Hillary will likely face The Donald , and that he could give her a tough challenge. He’s leaning on his super PAC, American Bridge, to step up delivery of a Trump oppo research book, contemplating strategic and tactical changes to Bridge’s program, and upping the group’s budget, the source said. Bridge’s union allies are telling Brock that Trump could attract significant support from rank-and-file union members in key states.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/21792

92

DTC8

25449

“He’s [Trump] winning state after state in the primaries and his campaign doesn’t show any signs of slowing. He’s even funding his own campaign, so there’s no fear of running out of resources and losing steam.”

“Trump’s widespread, unwavering support among GOP voters is nothing short of terrifying.”

That’s because this train has no brakes!

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/25449#efmAh5AlD

93

FP

Foreign Policy

94

FP1

927

Considering Hillary has been in Putin’s “inner sanctum” and approved of 20% of our uranium to end up in his governmental pockets, it shows her cozy relationship between them. HYPOCRITE!

Page 61 of attachment:

“Hillary Clinton Said One Time She Visited Putin And Bonded With Him Over Protecting The Habitat Of Tigers. “One time, I was visiting with him in his dacha outside of Moscow, and he was going on and on, you know, just listing all of the problems that he thinks are caused by the United States. And I said, ‘Well, you know, Mr.’—at that time, he was still prime minister. I said, ‘You know, Mr. Prime Minister, we actually have some things in common. We both want to protect wildlife, and I know how committed you are to protecting the tiger.’ I mean, all of a sudden, he sat up straight and his eyes got big and he goes, ‘You care about the tiger? I said, ‘I care about the tiger, I care about the elephant, I care about the rhinoceros, I care about the whale. I mean, yeah, I think we have a duty. You know, it’s an obligation that we as human beings have to protect God’s creation.’ He goes, ‘Come with me.’ So we go down the stairs, we go down this long hall, we go into this private inner sanctum. All of his, you know, very beefy security guys are there, they all jump up at attention, you know, they punch a code, he goes through a heavily-armed door. And then we’re in an inner, inner sanctum with, you know, just this long, wooden table, and then further back, there’s a desk and the biggest map of Russia I ever saw. And he starts talking to me about, you know, the habitat of the tigers and the habitat of the seals and the whales. And it was quite something.” [Jewish United Fund Of Metropolitan Chicago Vanguard Luncheon, 10/28/13]

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/927

95

FP2

927

>Hillary Clinton Dreams of ‘Open Trade and Open Borders’ & http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/devastating-wikileaks-document-drop-hillary-clinton-dreams-open-trade-open-borders/

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/927#efmFhxFke

96

FP3

1488

Drone chemical warfare

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/1488

97

FP4

2016

Iran treaty discussion; Hillary wants sanctions and military threats

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/2016

98

FP5

2034

In depth email dictating to Hillary what her stance on Israel should be

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/2034

99

FP6

2038

>Hillary’s own advisor blamed Hillary for Benghazi & https://twitter.com/AmyMek/status/785568915254575104

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/2038

100

FP7

2557

Discussions about reforming laws regarding guantanamo bay (GTMO) and torture with reference from the “National Security Team”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/2257

101

FP8

3774

Saudi Arabia & Qatar funding ISIS proof

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3774#efmBA5BDe

102

FP9

6330

Trade deal explanation only for sophisticated audiences

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/6330

103

FP10

7452

Foreign donor endowement?

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/7452

104

FP11

9954

Today’s Cost of War Receipt to the American People Iraq war invoice pretty much

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9954

105

FP12

18646

Muslim to Podesta: Trump Is Right “it really has little effect in the ISIL propaganda war if we’re hesitating to say “radical Islam”, they are already calling themselves the Islamic State after all”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/18646

106

FP13

26101

HRC IS SEEN AS EXTREMEMLY UNFRIENDLY TO ISRAEL

From:meganrouse@gmail.com
To: john.podesta@gmail.com
Date: 2015-05-11 21:21
Subject: Israel

“I’ve heard a concern from some folks who care deeply about Israel that Hillary will be the president “most unfriendly to Israel in our history, worse than Obama.” Thoughts on how I might respond in conversation? Thanks”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/26101

107

FP14

26661

Ron Klain acknowledges that Hillary is very vulnerable on ISIS and terrorism :

“That is, it is just a matter of time before the Republicans (certainly) and the media (likely) begin to try to use San Bernandino as a sign that things were broken while she was Sec State and that she did not do enough to fix them. And I don’t know if saying, “Hey, this really wasn’t a problem until after I left State” is going to cut it. That is, someone (a Democratic opponent now, a moderator, or a Republican opponent later) takes her line – “the first job of any President is to keep the American people safe” – and says, “Well, it’s also the first job of a Secretary of State too – and what did you do about it while you were Sec State?”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/26661

108

MC

Media Collusion

109

MC1

844

Media collusion with Podesta getting drafts of NYT articles before they’re published

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/844

110

MC2

910

Vice news does what Soros tells them

https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/910

111

MC3

1106

More pre-published NYT articles being passed along for review
(a Rothschild is not exactly our best voice on income inequality)

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/1106

112

MC4

1216

More media collusion with Podesta being aware of media preparations before they break

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/1216

113

MC5

2105

GOP debate moderator had lunch with Hillary’s campaign chief 3 weeks before the debate. see 4303

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/2105

114

MC6

2301

Bill Clinton’s sex life liability

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/2301

115

MC7

2591

CNBC/NYT Journalist John Harwood (was a Republican Primary debate moderator) reached out to John Podesta on numerous occasions, writing “congrats”, “she looked so much comfortable today” and more:

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/2591

116

MC8

3023

>DNC Chief Donna Brazile Conspired with Hillary to Defeat Bernie; Media Assisted Hillary & >https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/785575401275944960/photo/1 & >https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/785573145700892673/photo/1

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3023#efmAKjALL

117

MC9

3209

>The List of Reporters Were Taking Marching Orders from Hillary & (meta data) – https://www.fbcoverup.com/docs/library/2015-03-08-John-Podesta-Subject-Re-Press-and-Surrogate-Plan-Email-From-pir-at-hrcoffice-com-Cc-John-Podesta-EmailID-3209-WikiLeaks-Mar-08-2015.pdf & (meta data/better format) – https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3125944-Press-Surrogate-Plan-030815.html & >https://theintercept.com/2016/10/09/exclusive-new-email-leak-reveals-clinton-campaigns-cozy-press-relationship/ & >http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/wikileaks-outs-corrupt-media-list-reporters-taking-marching-orders-hillary/

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3209 (meta data)

118

MC10

3782

>Hillary Campaign thanking Univision’s owner Haim Saban for its moderators handling of Hillary against Sanders.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3782

119

MC11

3990

Hillary is a liability; becomes parasitic to Bernie’s cause

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3990

120

MC12

4180

Boston Globe colludes with Clinton campaign to give Hillary a “big presence”:

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4180#efmAJhALE

121

MC13

4213

>NYT Gave Hillary Veto Power On Quotes… & >http://www.lifezette.com/polizette/new-york-times-gave-hillary-veto/

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4213

122

MC14

4271

Scripted MSNBC interview

https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4274

123

MC15

4303

>CNBC John Harwood Abused GOP Candidates at Debate – Then Trashed Them in Email to Hillary Camp & GOP debate moderator privately emailing Podesta post-debate & >http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/video-cnbc-crank-john-harwood-abused-gop-candidates-debate-trashed-email-hillary-camp/

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4303

124

MC16

4316

Vice news looking to help Podesta “In any way they can”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4316

125

MC17

4381

HRC being lobbied to not follow fbi request for encryption

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4381

126

MC18

4543

4543 John Podesta hosts a dinner with reporters: I’m “Cooking for 30 of your reporter friends”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4543#efmAAGABu

127

MC19

4818

>CNN refers to Hillary as ‘Madre’ >https://twitter.com/hrtablaze/status/785983773124857856

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4818

128

MC20

4836

Head of Yahoo news planning pro-Hillary pieces with Podesta

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4836

129

MC21

5142

Media Collusion with NBC

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/5142

130

MC22

5205

>BRAZILE BUSTED: DNC Chief Shared CNN Town Hall Questions… & >http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/11/revealed-donna-brazile-shared-cnn-town-hall-questions-with-clinton-camp/

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/5205

131

MC23

5740

Ad for Hillary Clinton secretly pitched by ‘right-leaning’ Heat Street ‘journalist’ Louise Mensch:

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/5740#efmAMvAUe

132

MC24

5817

New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio asking Clinton staff for approval/input about what he will say when asked about Hillary Clinton by interviewer:

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/5817#efmANjAcC

133

MC25

5953

Clinton Staff hosts private “off-the-record cocktail party” with 38 “influential” reporters, journalists, editors, and anchors (from 16 different mainstream media outlets including CNN, NBC, CBS, NYT, MSNBC, & more) with the stated goal of “framing the race”. (see attachment)

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/5953

134

MC26

5988

5988 Huffington Post contributor Frank Islam writes to John Podesta in email titled “My blogs in the Huffington Post”, says “I am committed to make sure she is elected the next president.” “Please let me know if I can be of any service to you”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/5988#efmADmAE6AF-AG1

135

MC27

6453

Brent Budowsky (writer for The Hill and Huffington Post) warns John Podesta about possible Hillary attacks and that not talking to the press is killing her support: “I’m not going to raise this publicly, but..”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/6453#efmARBAUVAVJAXBAfNAhWAkaAl4

136

MC28

7273

>Polls are untrustworthy, middle class will go from Dem to Trump, the rich hate Trump according to democrat advisor

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/7273

137

MC29

7524

7524 Clinton staff “Placing a story” with Politico / New York Times: “place a story with a friendly journalist” “we have a very good relationship with Maggie Haberman of Politico” “we should shape likely leaks in the best light for HRC”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/7524#efmA14A2IA3AA36A9fA-kA-6BAICwpCx4

138

MC30

7570

MORE MEDIA COLLUSION: Progressive media & Clinton foundation

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/7570

139

MC31

7699

>Hillary staffers leaking reports to the NY Post to get them published

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/7699

140

MC32

7710

CNBC panelist colluding with John Podesta on what to ask Trump when he calls in for an interview:

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/7710#efmAakAd6AjgAlR

141

MC33

7742

Brent Budowsky (writer for The Hill and Huffington Post) acting as an advisor again: Warns Podesta: “Almost every message being projected outward from her campaign is negative, and a candidate with high distrust ratings should not be doing this. My phone has been ringing and my email box is full with democrats who like me who support her, but like me, are appalled and losing confidence” “This campaign is in very, very big trouble”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/7742#efmAAGAE0AlqAnx

142

MC34

7899

The Hill media collusion with HRC

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/7899

143

MC35

7966

>CNN suspends reporters for having private political views, also talks about using the “liberal media” as an entity

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/7966

144

MC36

8009

>Debate prep book 1

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/8009

145

MC37

8009

>Debate prep book 2

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails//fileid/8009/2407

146

MC38

8086

Just Clinton staff conspiring to fake Wallstreet speeches

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/8086

147

MC39

8359

Ben Sherwood is a writer, a journalist, and a producer who currently serves as the Co-Chairman of Disney Media Networks, and the President of Disney-ABC Television Group. Sherwood is the former President of ABC News

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/8359

148

MC40

8468

It seems that they get to control the release times of Associated Press articles relevant possible to when Hillary was declared the frontrunner by AP just before the california primary after anonymous calls of the AP to superdelegates.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/8460

149

MC41

8678

>FOX News Mole Leaked Town Hall Question to Clinton Campaign. & >http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/wikileaks-fox-news-mole-leaked-town-hall-question-clinton-campaign/ & >http://vesselnews.io/wikileaks-fox-news-mole-leaked-late-term-abortion-debate-question-hillary-campaign/

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/8678

150

MC42

9007

Clinton staff colluding with New York Times and Wall Street Journal to paint Hillary’s economic policies in a “progressive” light:

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9007#efmAcTAdS

151

MC43

9193

DipJar CEO confirmed for hillshill

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9193

152

MC44

9268

Collusion with Washington Post

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9268

153

MC45

9302

Numbers from Iowa are terrible

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9302

154

MC46

9318

The Daily Show = source of news

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9318

155

MC47

9416

More media collusion Campaign aware of a NYT article before its release

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9416

156

MC48

9507

The story is moving more and more toward terrorism and it seems like by riffing on guns just now she looked a little behind the curve.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9507

157

MC49

9530

>WASH POST burea chief protected Podesta… & >http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/11/washington-post-reporter-spiked-info-about-podesta-conflict-of-interest/

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9530

158

MC50

9547

Univision’s Haim Saban colluding with HRC campaign

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9547

159

MC51

9578

More media Collusion

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9578

160

MC52

9586

HRC campaign collusion with NYT report Mark Leibovich

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9586

161

MC53

9714

MORE MEDIA COLLUSION

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9714

162

MC54

9865

I didnt expect to be fucked by NYT – John Podesta to NYT

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9865

163

MC55

9922

BIG MEDIA COLLUSION

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9922

164

MC56

9992

Dreamwrks Media Collusion >Let’s talk after Meet the Press tmrw. Want to discuss Potus and Biden.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9992

165

MC57

10021

Jeffrey Katzenberg and Andy Spahn meeting with John podesta (Andy spahn being a huge democratic backer) >Andy Spahn (http://gonringspahn.com/andy_spahn.php) has been profiled in the Wall Street Journal, is recognized as one of the top Democratic fundraisers in the country, was named one of the “Biggest Political Players” by The Hollywood Reporter and one of POLITICO’s “50 People to Watch.” He frequently serves as a trusted source of information to the national press corps on politics and philanthropy

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/10021

166

MC58

10119

John Hardwood CNBC’s/NYT journalist again shown kissing the ass of Podesta & DNC

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/10119

167

MC59

10119

implicated

https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/10119#searchresult

168

MC60

10160

Collusion with the DNC and Univsion & Telemundo & Spanish radio

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/10160

169

MC61

10288

HRC and stagg got the questions and answers in advance of this forum with Bernie, Martin O’Malley & HRC http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2016/2016/01/12/brown-and-black-forum-mixes-blunt-questions-lighter-fare/78668732/

https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/10288

170

MC62

10547

Progressive Media Outreach & Strategy Plan – Echo Chamber

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/10547

171

MC63

10951

Forcing Progressive Agenda at every level of Govt for Years to Come

https://wikileaks.com/podesta-emails/emailid/10951

172

MC64

11104

From Liz bartolomeo “Neera — David Herszenhorn’s story in the Times is now online; Everyone in this email chain has an @americanprogress.org and some are
affiliated with news networks like Lindsay Hamilton being one of the
recipients, she works for TSN http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/02/06/us/politics/hillary-clinton-lobbied-on-health-care-as-secretary-of-state-emails-show.htm

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/11104

173

MC65

11106

Scheduling Call w/ Jeffrey Katzenberg

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/11106

174

MC66

11150

Hillary Campaign in bed with NYT, Mika (Joe’s gf), make fun of Cruz’s Canadian birther issue to distract the public from HRC email disaster.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/11150

175

MC67

11277

Clinton campaign tells “AP, Politico, WSJ, WaPo, etc…” exactly what to say and when to say it, from her medical records to speech income. Even dictates exact headlines.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/11277

176

MC68

11277

HRC “excellent health” statement being leaked to ‘press’

https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/11277

177

MC69

11409

EVERY SINGLE MSM OUTLET HAS SHILLS LISTED HERE &
https://twitter.com/PrisonPlanet/status/787650648535887872

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/11409

178

MC70

11699

placing “transparency” story with politico journalist Maggie Haberman

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/11699

179

MC71

11760

more co-coordinating with NYT and WSJ.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/11760#efmB52B7o

180

MC72

12063

List of media personalities who went to the “off the record” private party in the personal home of John Podesta. Includes many corrupt, in the tank-for-Hillary journalists like John Heillman, Mark Halperin, Maggie Haberman (colluding in other emails with the Hillary campaign) and many others. Largest amount of invitees who said yes to the private party are from the NYT, Bloomberg, MSNBC, CNN . Seems to nicely reflect the level of corruption and pro-Hillary bias. This is April 2015 so they were influencing and corrupting journalists for a long time and their investment clearly paid off.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12063

181

MC73

12110

EMAIL 12110 From: Glenn Thrush, Chief Political Correspondent & Senior Staff Writer at POLITICO to John Podesta “I need u It’s an Obama WH story you are in the thing… in a good way but could really use your insights sorry to be a pain in the ass ” The only Obama related article by Glenn Thrush around this time is this one: http://archive.is/gMigP – archived so the evidence can’t get as easily deleted as Crooked Hillary Clinton’s 33 000 emails.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12110

182

MC74

12189

Final nail in the coffin that Politico is an arm of the Clinton campaign

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12189

183

MC75

12189

Glenn Thrush from POLITICO checking to make sure his article is okay to print. What a bitch!

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12189

184

MC76

12191

More direct dealings with the press (Politico)

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12191#efmAAGACyAGGAHk

185

MC77

12196

MEDIA COLLUSION: Jennifer Palmieri is complaining that in an interview with WJC about the Foundation, NBC asked CRITICAL questions since they had PREVIOUSLY agreed to paint the foundation in a good light, even though they are still promising to do so. So she makes a contingency plan for good press: “Craig has gotten in touch with NY mag this am to do a story about how grossly the media has handled the story on book/foundation and make this experience with NBC part of that story.”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12196

186

MC78

12196

Trouble with NBC? Call Chuck Todd, he’ll take care of it.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12196

187

MC79

12241

– hillary given questions and answers for several TV appearances

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12241

188

MC80

12278

Looking for someone outside the campaign to attribute to an article that they wrote for medium:
This is the article: https://medium.com/@clai.lasher/i-m-with-hillary-f8a0b943dcbc

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12278

189

MC81

12278

Looking for someone outside the campaign to attribute to an article that they wrote for medium:
This is the article: https://medium.com/@clai.lasher/i-m-with-hillary-f8a0b943dcbc

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12278

https://twitter.com/AlexandreHilt0n/status/786920423908868097

190

MC82

12403

EMAILID 12403 From the attachment section of the email. This pdf memo reveals extremely close coordination between Eric Schmidt (google) and the Clinton campaign as early as 2014. They are developing software tools to help out the Clinton campaign. “I have been kept apprised of the work being done by Eric Schmidt’s group and others working directly and indirectly with your team. .. In summary: We have selected a team of developers, unaffiliated with Eric, to build the front-end of your website… Eric’s team is also developing products that are not, strictly speaking, critical for launch, but would be extremely useful to have as early in the cycle as possible”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12403

191

MC83

12403

Hillary campaign coordinating with Executive Chairman of Google parent Alphabet, Inc Eric Schmidt in 2014 (FEC laws you fucks)

• We have selected a team of developers, unaffiliated with Eric, to build the front-end of your website — a relatively simple process that does not need to have begun yet. These are former employees of mine in whom I have the highest confidence. They are apprised of what Eric is building but not dependent on it, having identified commercially available products for all mission-critical functions in the event Eric’s group is delayed or otherwise derailed.

• We have instructed Eric’s team to build the most important products in their portfolio — specifically, the back-end of the website, the ability to accept donations (along with associated features, most importantly the ability to store credit card information), and the ability to acquire email addresses — first. Given how much time remains between now and launch — and, again, the availability of alternative solutions — I believe there is effectively no chance that these core functionalities will not be in place in time for launch.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12403

192

MC84

12427

EMAILID 12427 Clinton campaign is getting questions in advance AGAIN for debates. Previously they got a debate question from Donna Brazile. This time it is John Podesta that gets the email from Jon Soltz who somehow learned of a question Cavuto will ask in an upcoming Republican debate. Podesta immediately blasts this out to the whole campaign so they prepare for the fallout. Soltz to Podesta: “We have gotten intel that Neil Cavuto plans to ask a veterans question of the GOP candidates tonight. As you can guess, the candidates are very likely to attack the Secretary in their answers. Your press team, therefore, may find it useful to get this to reporters”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12427

193

MC85

12681

Glenn Thrush, Politico Chief Political Correspondent: “No worries
> Because I have become a hack I will send u the whole section that pertains
> to u
> Please don’t share or tell anyone I did this
> Tell me if I fucked up anything”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12681#efmABjAEV

194

MC86

12681

EMAILID 12681 Glenn Thrush Politico’s “Chief Political Correspondent” , extremely corrupt, dishonest “journalist” writes to John Podesta: “Because I have become a hack I will send u the whole section that pertains to u Please don’t share or tell anyone I did this Tell me if I fucked up anything” then he sends a huge part of the article to John Podesta. Absolutely disgraceful. Podesta approves the section of course which showed him in a very positive light to begin with. Don’t worry Glenn Trush of the Politico. I’m sure Podesta won’t tell anyone you did this.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12681#efmAByAEV

195

MC87

12681

EMAILID 12681 Glenn Thrush , extremely corrupt, dishonest “journalist” writes to John Podesta: “Because I have become a hack I will send u the whole section that pertains to u Please don’t share or tell anyone I did this Tell me if I fucked up anything” then he sends a huge part of the article to John Podesta. Absolutely disgraceful. Podesta approves the section of course which showed him in a very positive light to begin with. Don’t worry Glenn Trush of the Politico. I’m sure Podesta won’t tell anyone you did this.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12681#efmAByAEV

196

MC88

12831

EMAILID 12831 Foreign press reaches out to the Clinton campaign : “I am writing to you on behalf of the Leading European Newspaper Alliance (LENA), which brings together Die Welt from Germany, El País from Spain, Belgium’s Le Soir, La Reppublica from Italy … an interview with Secretary Clinton. There is plenty for the Secretary to say to the people of Europe. We do not have a set timeframe, and we are perfectly aware of how tight her schedule is. We also know that interviews get arranged by strict policies and guidelines and only if they serve the communication agenda of the Secretary.”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12831#efmAS-AVL

197

MC89

12831

EMAILID 12831 Foreign press reaches out to the Clinton campaign : “I am writing to you on behalf of the Leading European Newspaper Alliance (LENA), which brings together Die Welt from Germany, El País from Spain, Belgium’s Le Soir, La Reppublica from Italy … an interview with Secretary Clinton. There is plenty for the Secretary to say to the people of Europe. We do not have a set timeframe, and we are perfectly aware of how tight her schedule is. We also know that interviews get arranged by strict policies and guidelines and only if they serve the communication agenda of the Secretary.”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12831#efmAS-AVL

198

MC90

13817

EMAILID 13817 Brent Budowsky again writing to Podesta… It seems Budowsky was an informal adviser of sorts to Podesta (while claiming to be a “journalist”). Budowsky wrote Podesta 70 emails according to the search engine, just in the leaks released so far. This time Budowsky appears to fish for a pat on the back, writing “You’ll enjoy how I handled Trump’s attack against Huma, among other things…Brent” and attaches his latest article, no doubt the fruit of the unhealthy relationship between him and Podesta. http://archive.is/3FStJ Budowsky is as clear a case of a Clinton campaign operative pretending to be a journalist as there ever was. I provided an archived version of the article because of the Clinton campaign’s known penchant for deleting incriminating evidence.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/13817

199

MC91

13817

EMAILID 13817 Brent Budowsky again writing to Podesta… It seems Budowsky was an informal adviser of sorts to Podesta (while claiming to be a “journalist”). Budowsky wrote Podesta 70 emails according to the search engine, just in the leaks released so far. This time Budowsky appears to fish for a pat on the back, writing “You’ll enjoy how I handled Trump’s attack against Huma, among other things…Brent” and attaches his latest article, no doubt the fruit of the unhealthy relationship between him and Podesta. http://archive.is/3FStJ Budowsky is as clear a case of a Clinton campaign operative pretending to be a journalist as there ever was. I provided an archived version of the article because of the Clinton campaign’s known penchant for deleting incriminating evidence.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/13817

200

MC92

15092

Mark Zuckerberg (Facebook) – ” He’s begun to think about whether/how he might want to shape advocacy efforts to support his philanthropic priorities and is particularly interested in meeting people who could help him understand how to move the needle on the specific public policy issues he cares most about. He wants to meet folks who can inform his understanding about effective political operations to advance public policy goals on social oriented objectives (like immigration, education or basic scientific research).”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/15092#efmARfAUUAZoAd9AeeAf6

201

MC93

15261

EMAILID 15261 More from Mindy (the mole on Elizabeth Warren’s team) and Maggie (an NYT journalist, often colluding with the Clinton campaign). Mindy is giving up inside info as usual, Maggie is colluding as usual. ” The NYT (Jonathan Martin and Maggie Haberman) reached out this morning to tell us that they are aware of a meeting HRC had with Senator Warren at her house back in December. They plan to write imminently, so wanted everyone to be aware that this could pop soon.” Giving advance warning. “Just talked w Mindy. Good convo. She said she’s been getting really good feedback about Dan’s outreach–she said she knows we are talking to the people they suggested and they really like Dan…So good work, Schwerin! Also, she flagged that they’re going to push back hard against POTUS on trade.” handing out info. “And the NYT piece is fine — for both sides.” Of course it is good for you, one of your pawns Maggie Haberman co-wrote it. Phillipe Reines on the same NYT story : “They have to believe it came from us. Reads too perfectly for HRC. If we intended to do it it probably wouldn’t read so perfectly.” Once again a crooked journalist wrote it so it is no big surprise it reads “too perfectly for HRC”. Just remember that Maggie Haberman from the NYT is as Crooked as they come.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/15261

202

MC94

15261

EMAILID 15261 More from Mindy (the mole on Elizabeth Warren’s team) and Maggie (an NYT journalist, often colluding with the Clinton campaign). Mindy is giving up inside info as usual, Maggie is colluding as usual. ” The NYT (Jonathan Martin and Maggie Haberman) reached out this morning to tell us that they are aware of a meeting HRC had with Senator Warren at her house back in December. They plan to write imminently, so wanted everyone to be aware that this could pop soon.” Giving advance warning. “Just talked w Mindy. Good convo. She said she’s been getting really good feedback about Dan’s outreach–she said she knows we are talking to the people they suggested and they really like Dan…So good work, Schwerin! Also, she flagged that they’re going to push back hard against POTUS on trade.” handing out info. “And the NYT piece is fine — for both sides.” Of course it is good for you, one of your pawns Maggie Haberman co-wrote it. Phillipe Reines on the same NYT story : “They have to believe it came from us. Reads too perfectly for HRC. If we intended to do it it probably wouldn’t read so perfectly.” Once again a crooked journalist wrote it so it is no big surprise it reads “too perfectly for HRC”. Just remember that Maggie Haberman from the NYT is as Crooked as they come.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/15261

203

MC95

15398

Mark Penn says they will be supportive.He was at Microsoft but apparently the stagwell group is involved in polling

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/15398

204

MC96

15434

This email talks about a guy named Chip Smith wanting to help out with the campaign. He is the ceo/coo of Glover Park Group, a lobbying firm, and previously had worked on the Gore campaign. In 2013 the firm, full of ex Clinton staffers, donated to the CF according to this article: http://thehill.com/business-a-lobbying/business-a-lobbying/193467-group-touted-clinton-access-for-250000.

More interestingly, in May of this year, Chippy became the chief lobbyist for good old Rupert Murdoch and 21st Century Fox. The Cuckening of Fox is real. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/wp/2016/05/05/chip-smith-democratic-strategist-and-gore-aide-to-take-top-lobbying-job-at-21st-century-fox/

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/15434

205

MC97

15455

EMAILID 15455 Email contains attachments with the agenda of a 2007 meeting in NY. Many issues are discussed, like the topic of creating a media “echo chamber” : Control the political discourse. So much effort over the past few years has been focused on better coordinating, strengthening, and developing progressive institutions and leaders. Now that this enhanced infrastructure is in place—grassroots organizing; multi-issue advocacy groups; think tanks; youth outreach; faith communities; micro-targeting outfits; the netroots and blogosphere—we need to better utilize these networks to drive the content of politics through a strong “echo chamber” and message delivery system.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/15455

206

MC98

15525

Laura Meckler from WSJ dinner with Podesta and kissing ass Podesta forwards to HRC campaign and asks: No good deed goes unpunished. Let me know how to handle. HRC campaign responds: Send her to us.

https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/15525#searchresult

207

MC99

15542

RIGGED POLLS! We are as interested in the “who” suburban, rural, we are polling as the issues. The plan includes a possible focus on women, might be something we want to do is over sample if we are worried about a certain group later in the summer.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/15442

208

MC100

15563

More media collusion + getting celebs to tweet pro Hillary video. It’s all organized folks.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/15563

209

MC101

15722

Clinton Camp received heads up on stories from Politico before they are published

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/15722

210

MC102

15798

The failing New York Times proves themselves as DNC lapdogs once again

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/15798

211

MC103

15819

Here’s Katie Couric sucking up to the campaign, guaranteeing “viral” potential if she’ll grant an interview.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/15819#efmAFaALTAN_AP5

212

MC104

15856

Apple’s “experts” working with the Clinton campaign after encryption issue

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/15856

213

MC105

15856

they were offered cybersecurity advice…

“Hey John, I know you’ve seen the article below. Huge issue out here as I am sure you know. If you ever want our tech experts to brief your folks, we’d be happy to do it.”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/15856

214

MC106

16329

Observer writer colluding with Clinton campaign

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/16329

215

MC107

17311

MEDIA COLLUSION
WaPo ‘journalist’ trying to see how they can help with a story on WJC

https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/17311#searchresult

216

MC108

17435

More Media collusion, getting a story that will break next week a week in advance so they can prepare a statement

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/17435

217

MC109

17451

EMAILID 17451 Remember how tweets signed by -H supposedly come from Hillary personally?

Tweets like this one https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/status/612002144686874627 Archived version http://archive.is/u4Kwz (no sudden deletions through BleachBit here)

The discussion in this email determined that that was a lie. Teddy Goff, John Podesta, Lauren Peterson and others discuss and craft that tweet through several revisions. Earlier versions include

Real problems take real solutions. Thank you, @Pontifex https://twitter.com/Pontifex, for shining a light on the crisis of climate change. -H

.

There’s only one thing to say about @Pontifex https://twitter.com/Pontifex’s bold statements on climate change & renewable energy: Amen. -H

I believe these are the two we landed on as far as people’s favorites.

So there were even more versions before this…

Teddy Geoff:

Adding Podesta here too for his review. I vote #2, but defer to the non-Jews on this thread if anyone thinks “amen” might rub people the wrong way.

Lauren Peterson

How’s this? .@Pontifex https://twitter.com/Pontifex is right—climate change is a > moral crisis that disproportionately harms the neediest among us. We need > leadership, not denial. -H

John Podesta

I like it.

Notice how that last version is the same that was tweeted out. So tweets signed by -H actually came when John Podesta “liked it” and went through numerous revisions, reviews and product of teamwork beforehand. With 0% actual input from Hillary Clinton.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/17451#efmAB8AErAWOAYnAYyAbJ

218

MC110

17556

Podesta decides to stonewall the WSJ. This email has the subject:Confidential . The staff is very very worried about the WSJ finding out that Hillary is already having meetings and building the campaign team in early 2014. He milks info out of the journalist which he shares with the others so they can map out what the guy knows. For some reason they are very afraid of this one. Podesta writes about the meeting with the WSJ journalist.:

He was doing a story on who wanted her to run, who didn’t. Had you in the latter category Only thing I told him was there was a third category-people who thought it was her decision and would support her whatever she decided. He had you, me and Maggie meeting with her at Whitehaven. Didn’t mention Plouffe. I didn’t engage with him on the topic. Just let him talk and gave nothing back.

They made a complete fool out of this poor WSJ guy. He should come out and set the record straight regarding this issue.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/17556

219

MC111

18744

Glenn Thrush is at it again. In a previous email defined himself as a “hack journalist” and pleaded with Podesta “please don’t tell anyone I did this” when colluding with him. Now Glenn saw a bad tweet from Podesta and he immediately feels the need to grovel at his feet:

Saw your tweet I think u know I wasn’t fabricating you anything… No need for a response, but I hope u understand that I take this stuff seriously and try to be sensitive to the human impact of these shitty stories I take zero pleasure in them — whether u folks believe me or not Cheers and good luck today

Podesta’s response

..my tweet was accurate so 1) maybe you should question your sources or 2) maybe you are talking to people on the inside who the pressure is getting to.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/18744

220

MC112

18744

From:john.podesta@gmail.com To: gthrush@politico.com Date: 2016-02-09 18:52 Subject: Re: OTR

I have no doubt you had sources for your story and weren’t just making it up, but my tweet was accurate so 1) maybe you should question your sources or 2) maybe you are talking to people on the inside who the pressure is getting to.

On Tuesday, February 9, 2016, Glenn Thrush gthrush@politico.com wrote: > Saw your tweet > I think u know I wasn’t fabricating you anything… > No need for a response, but I hope u understand that I take this stuff > seriously and try to be sensitive to the human impact of these shitty > stories > I take zero pleasure in them — whether u folks believe me or not > Cheers and good luck today > > Sent from my iPhone

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/18744

221

MC113

19070

EMAILID 19070 Sheryl Sandberg, Chief Operating Officer of Facebook writes to John Podesta May 2015:

And I still want HRC to win badly. I am still here to help as I can. She came over and was magical with my kids.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/19070#efmACIAD6

222

MC114

19362

Gloria Borger, CNN Chief Political Correspondent casually chatting & sucking up to Podesta

From:Gloria.Borger@turner.com
To: john.podesta@gmail.com
Date: 2016-02-12 04:16
Subject: Re: U r a tv star!

She had a really good debate tonite

On Feb 12, 2016, at 1:14 AM, John Podesta <john.podesta@gmail.com> wrote:

Yup

On Thursday, February 11, 2016, Borger, Gloria <Gloria.Borger@turner.com> wrote:
I have been in gop hell. Will reach out soon! U good?

https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/19362#searchresult

223

MC115

20133

Much of this was already covered in earlier batches. Jake Tapper was upset about a story by Faiz Shakir. He complained directly to Jenifer Palmieri and John Podesta though.

The new parts in this chain are both from Jake Tapper:

What’s the plan? To try to intimidate reporters who ever report on anything the White House disapproves of? Disgusting.

The report Thinkprogress filed about me is dead wrong. I made that clear to your reporter and he wrote it any way. If this is the quality of CAP’s work I will let ABC News know that your organization cannot be counted on for factually accurate information.

https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/20133

224

MC116

21454

Surrogate List! Names, dates, times, and what network they were on. Lot of surrogates here from Februrary. I have no idea whether all of them were known to be surrogates of Crooked Hillary at the time or they presented themselves as neutral commentators.

Also, all of the below have the memo – let me know if there are other messages we want them driving?

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/21454

225

MC117

21526

Re: 315 pm prep for FOX Town Hall Prep

While prepping for a town hall once again they “hear” the topics in advance.
Must be nice. Before almost every debate. To “hear” topics. Questions.

Kristina Costas writes:

Flagging that Bob B. heard that they could ask about carbon tax and late-term abortion restrictions. Solow and I are pulling debate book materials & running abortion answer by Jen & Rachel ahead of 3pm.

Bob B. Hmmm. Could it be Bob Beckel using his contacts at FOX?

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/21526#efmAJiAOE

226

MC118

21526

An interesting thread trying to chase down the FOX MOLE who was just revealed in Podesta 12.5 (this thread)

https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/58bshg/fox_news_debate_a_sham_get_this_to_the_top/

The existence of moles are revealed by the documented instances where questions or topics were leaked before a debate directly to the Hillary Clinton Campaign and the Podesta Emails show undeniable proof of it. See some of the newly discovered evidence below about a person named Bob B.. He was leaking information from FOX to the Clinton campaign. Bob B. leaked two upcoming questions, one about “carbon tax” and “late term abortion restrictions” before a town hall debate. The following text was sent as part of an email between Clinton operatives just before a previous Fox debate

Flagging that Bob B. heard that they could ask about carbon tax and late-term abortion restrictions. Solow and I are pulling debate book materials & running abortion answer by Jen & Rachel ahead of 3pm.

This is extremely important since the third presidential debate will be on the same FOX, this new information just came to light about. With confirmed previous leaking at FOX, we can not be sure the presidential debate questions were not also leaked. In fact it is extremely likely that the exact same system that produced one leak in one debate would produce another leak in another debate

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/21526#efmAJiAOE

227

MC119

21716

Tapper, ABC, colluding with Podesta on a tweet

From:Jake.Tapper@abc.com To: john.podesta@gmail.com,

Some just tweeted something inaccurate about me, claiming I said something I didn’t. What am I supposed to do here?

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/21716

228

MC120

21886

Flournoy vetting Politico stories

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/21886

229

MC121

21935

HRC has no black support and collusion with media

From:kfinney@hillaryclinton.com To: jennifer.m.palmieri@gmail.com Date: 2015-08-18 19:30 Subject: Re: Hillary Clinton needs to sit down with black reporters fast. Her efforts in the black community are not resonating

April Ryan White House Correspondent Washington Bureau Chief American Urban Radio Networks
>I would love to be a part of this sit down hopefully in DC.

From:kfinney@hillaryclinton.com To: jennifer.m.palmieri@gmail.com
how about I circle back with her. It’s a good idea

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/21935

230

MC122

22283

HRC campaign dining with 25 reporters

Subject: RE: Press Dinners – Full Info

Here is the current RSVP list to the Thursday Night (4/9) dinner at Podesta’s.

As a reminder, this is with the 25 reporters more closely following HRC (aka the future bus).

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/22283

231

MC123

22284

MORE EVIDENCE OF MEDIA COLLUSION

Glenn Thrush, Politico Chief Political Correspondent to Podesta
>Saw your tweet I think u know I wasn’t fabricating you anything… No need for a response, but I hope u understand that I take this stuff seriously and try to be sensitive to the human impact of these shitty stories I take zero pleasure in them — whether u folks believe me or not Cheers and good luck today

Podesta Responds
>I have no doubt you had sources for your story and weren’t just making it up, but my tweet was accurate so 1) maybe you should question your sources or 2) maybe you are talking to people on the inside who the pressure is getting to.

Thrush Cowers
>1) I do 2) very fair point Again best of luck

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/22284

232

MC124

23689

HRC USING MORE COLLUDING MEDIA ORGS TO DISCREDIT BERNIE & PROOF THEY LINE UP PAID FOR “VALIDATORS” TO BE THEIR MOUTH PIECE TO GIVE THE ILLUSION OF CREDIBILITY

Bradley Komar wrote:
“The only candidate to oppose fracking” “What does that mean? A complete 100% fracking ban. There is no elected dem and I believe no enviro group that takes this position. In fact, such an extreme position threatens the progress of common-sense safety measures like frack fluid disclosure and methane capture/air quality regulations.

I think the Denver Post Ed Board could smack Sanders if we want them to but that makes it a bigger fight.”
MORE MSM CONTROLLED BY HRC

*From:* Bradley Komar
*Sent:* Tuesday, February 23, 2016 6:57 PM
*To:* Lily Adams
*Subject:* Re: NEW AD: Bernie Sanders – “Frack”
“I agree 100% would love to whistle passed the graveyard. but they are airing the ad for a reason, I expect they will draw us into a comment, and validators knocking Bernie for being irresponsible and in doing so, threatening real progress, makes a lot of sense to me. This is yet another promise he can’t keep.

I can quietly line up the validators now or wait until he fires. Nothing public until we a drawn out.”
HRC CAMPAIGN LINING UP BOUGHT AND PAID FOR “VALIDATORS” THAT WILL SAY WHATEVER THEY ARE TOLD TO DISCREDIT BERNIE’S POSITION

https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/23689

233

MC125

24675

EMAILD Much of this email appeared in earlier leaks, just the last response from Philippe Reines is new. That result seems like Reines wanted to play a larger part in the campaign but he was not trusted enough.

This email chain shows there were multiple leaks from the Hillary campaign and someone was leaking information that Andrea Mitchell was going to get an interview with Hillary. There were also possible leaks to Andrea Mitchell herself. Just recently Brian Fallon was writing something stealthily providing that information to Andrea Mitchell in the middle of a press conference. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IMU_2V-bl-4 Andrea Mitchell got to ask a question soon after.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/24675

234

MC126

25106

MEDIA COLLUSION

Dan Feiffer of CNN is a “Hillary supporter”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/25106#efmAH-AIx

235

MC127

25264

HRC CAMPAIGN GIVEN HEADS UP ON AN ARTICLE BEING WRITTEN BEFORE ITS PUBLISHED

Dems trying to brainstorm how to counter such a negative article, given my a media insider before it comes out.

“Roy-Don’t be surprised if I write a column soon that Hillary is going to blow it, and is repeating her mistakes of 2008, with stories about her “shadow campaign” of consultants milking her for a lot of money, while she gives paid speeches to banks, while she acts like an incumbent, and says virtually nothing important about what Democrats stand for, while the most admired person in the world is the pope for saying the kind of things she should be saying but isn’t about economic fairness. This has got to be the worst pre-campaign in my memory. Imagine running as the candidate for the Democratic nomination as the candidate of banks, consultants and insiders. Unbelievable.”

https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/25264

236

MC128

25264

Brent Budowsky BTFO. He is the guy who wrote to Podesta a huge number of emails. No other journalist wrote to Podesta so much as Brent. And yet this is how Podesta viewed his own personal lapdog :

“To you only: Brent Budowsky. Leftie with no following, but clearly Roy sort of agrees with concerns .”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/25264#efmABnADO

237

MC129

25540

Louise Mensch (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louise_Mensch. She was the Conservative MP for Corby from 2010 to 2012.[2] She is currently the head of the news website Heat Street.) writes:

“As you will know from Arnold I am a committed Republican (or would be if I had the vote this year). But I worry no end about Donald Trump becoming our President… much rather have your girl Hillary.

Anyway, the politician in me thinks Lena Dunham and Gloria Steinem are nails on a chalkboard to the average American woman…

Her [HRC] competence and intelligence are beyond doubt, her problem is warmth.”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/25540

238

MC130

25651

MORE COLLUSION BETWEEN BUDOWSKY (JOURNALIST) AND PODESTA/HRC CAMPAIGN

Brent Budowsky <brentbbi@webtv.net> wrote:

“Walk back and escape from her statement that “finally we are where we need to be” against ISIS. We are not where we need to be, we are far from it, most voters do not believe it, and when the next terror attack comes in America— which it certainly will—-she will be branded in hot iron with that statement.”

“She can praise Obama without such extravagant overstatement and such direct endorsement of his policy by falsely stating we are where we need to be.”
THE PUBLIC DOES NOT BELIEVE WE ARE WHERE WE NEED TO BE WITH ISIS. SHE CLEARLY WAS GRANDSTANDING

“I suspect her negative trust ratings are locked in through election day. If there is a Trump ISIS video the campaign release it. If not, her untrustworthy numbers will remain further locked at high levels. These trust problems are self-induced and keep occurring.”
HRC IS EXTREMELY UNTRUSTWORTHY AND HER CAMPAIGN KNOWS IT

“p.s. On the UN last week, support it yes, but be careful. I love Kerry like a bro’ and support him always as HRC should and does.”
IS THIS IN REFERENCE TO THE 7TH FLOOR MENTIONED IN OTHER LEAKED EMAILS?

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/25651#efmAlaAlhAliAluAnAAntA2SA3ZA4dA5gA5jA6cBC7BD0BFiBG-

239

MC131

26121

More from Brent Budowsky “journalist” to John Podesta February 2015 :

“John, some free advice, good advice. Clinton Foundation should cut off foreign donations ASAP. Inevitably will happen anyway, they should get it off the table now.. You do not need me to tell you, before this campaign is done, it will not be pretty. I will not publicly call for this, but this is my advice to you and them”

So this is what he believes, about the foreign donations but won’t mention it as an alleged journalist only as the personal email bro of John Podesta.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/26121

240

MC132

26336

REUTERS REPORTER GIVING PODESTA HEADS UP ON BENGHAZI INVESTIGATION DOCUMENTATION & GIVES INFO THAT MIGHT DERAIL IT

Mark Hosenball (thomson reuters) to Podesta wrote:

“I have run across a rather interesting document which outlines in detail the principal current objectives of the House Benghazi Committee, and was wondering if you might have a minute or two to discuss this. If you are anywhere near 1333 H in next day or two I might even show the document to you (I’m out on Thursday, however) though I am reluctant to hand out copies at this stage. It is a document which raises some questions about the bona fides of the committee’s investigation, rather than about anything specific a certain former SecState might have done. If this is something that you would not want to get involved in, if you had any alternative ideas as to who I ought to speak to I would welcome them. Hope all is well etc. All best & regards mh”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/26336

241

MC133

26404

MORE MEDIA COLLUSION WITH THE WSJ

EMAILID 26404 Corrupt WSJ reporter thanks Podesta for the extravagant dinner party in his home. Fantastic food and great opportunities “to connect”. They don’t even have to bribe these journalists with money, they are presstituting themselves for free diners, better connections and “scoops” from the Clinton Campaign.

“Hi John – I just wanted to thank you again for your hospitality last night. You were so kind to open your home to us, and the food was as fantastic as promised (everyone at the White House raves about your dinners). I really appreciated the opportunity to connect with a number of folks from Team Clinton. The evening was a great way to kick off this crazy adventure. Thank you, and I hope we’ll cross paths again soon. Best,
Colleen
Colleen McCain Nelson
The Wall Street Journal

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/26404

242

MC134

N/A

Content Subject: Initial investigative report confirms HRC/meda/third part collusion

Immediate Implications: This initial report confirms numerous reporters and HRC staffers were aware, encouraging, and utilizing media collusion to better frame and prepare HRC for her presidential campaign.

Full Report:

With the conclusion of the Third Presidential Debate, media sources began attacking Donald Trump for his “conspiratorial language” regarding collusion and vote rigging. These attacks occurred well before the Third Debate. Numerous high level individuals stated point blankly that there was no collusion or rigging of events.

Initial investigations by Task Force 58 have determined that statements claiming that there is no collusion are false. Numerous emails have been identified that confirm collusion at a number of levels with large media outlets. These include but are not limited to the following:

ABC
NBC
MSNBC
Politico
Huffington Post
The New York Times

Reporters of note involved directly include:

Jake Tapper
Chuck Todd

Reporters will try to hide themselves in their emails either by reporting to an HRC campaign handler that then forwards their articles to the campaign for review and approval, or they will use gmail accounts to hide their identity. We are working hard to try and match mails with names.

In the meantime, we have prepared a PDF that of our initial results. Ordinarily, we would not release such a small document. However, we felt it prudent to provide you all with this information given recent events. The PDF can be downloaded here .

Task Force 58 will continue to research and categorize evidence of collusion and provide a more full report in the future.

Addendum

Enterprising members of the community have identified additional pieces of evidence linked to collusion. See below for a list.

https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/58i06d/holeeshet_clinton_staffer_shows_reporter_what_she/ , thank you /u/skyparavoz for being its OP, and to u/fastmandan and u/REEB for bringing it to attention.

https://www.facebook.com/mary.walker.73307/videos/o.978104268920212/10206353006137164/?type=2&theater , thank you u/sandman441

https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/58i06d/holeeshet_clinton_staffer_shows_reporter_what_she/

243

OTR

Other Miscellaneous Emails

244

OTR1

2010

Silberstein Foundation: the truth finally comes out. & MAJOR Soros connections

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/2010

245

OTR2

2091

General campaign strategy along with discussion of expanding intelligence agencies

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/2091

246

OTR3

2874

Top Clinton Aid Doug Band calls Chelsea Clinton a “spoiled brat”:

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/2874#efmANUAObAb9AgY

247

OTR4

4190

Eric McFadden, who was Hillary’s Catholic liaison in the primaries, was arrested yesterday forrunning a prostitution ring.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4190

248

OTR5

4607

>THIS JUDGE IS AN OLD FRIEND OF PODESTAS, THE CIA ASKED PODESTA TO CALL HIM

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4607

249

OTR6

5953

>Event Memo – Benensons OTR. >Event Memo – Benensons OTR (attachment) – http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3479690/posts

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/5953

250

OTR7

6008

Mention of wetwork at the Vineyard days before Scalia’s death. Possible Supreme Court Justice Murder ((Antonin Scalia))

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/6008

251

OTR8

7252

Extend Illinois Voting

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/7252

252

OTR9

7278

>Hillary’s Podesta and Soros are working together & https://twitter.com/WDFx2EU7/status/786570301039534082

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/7278

253

OTR10

7572

Hillarys campaign moving IL primary at gusto

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/7252?2

254

OTR11

7922

>Podesta talking to the Rockerfellers

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/7922

255

OTR12

8158

Big business saw Jeb Bush and Hillary Clinton interchangeable! they are moving quickly to fill the dinner speaker spot and are talking about trying to get Jeb Bush if HRC can’t do it!

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/8158

256

OTR13

10217

MEGA DUMP on McCain in case he ran

https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/10217

257

OTR14

10252

ROH – Global Giving Campaign (Roots of Health) & Includes Google Doc w Marketing Material

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/10252

258

OTR15

10515

“That’s great news.” that the benghazi emails won’t be released “Monday”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/10515

259

OTR16

10667

Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: johnpodestatemp@outlook.com

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/10667

260

OTR17

10731

You are trying to poach from the WH, need to stop. One toke over the > line. Wally is fair game.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/10731

261

OTR18

11116

Podesta: “Back to the future. I managed this issue for President Clinton after we got ourselves all tangled in knots over the Clipper Chip.”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/11116

262

OTR19

11508

Jake Siewert (Goldman Sachs) to Podesta: Might be time for Denny [Dennis Hastert] to vanish to an undisclosed Japanese island.” regarding politico article on tax evasion

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/11508

263

OTR20

11897

EMAILID 11897 Democats are campaigning with the prospects of owning the Supreme Court for decades to come. Written by Augie Ribeiro, but John Podesta loves it and finds it great. “Be a Voice to Decide The Future of the Supreme Court The next President of the United States will change the future of the Supreme Court for generations. By the middle of the next President’s term, there will be four Supreme Court justices in their 80s. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg born March 15, 1933. Justice Antonin Scalia born March 11, 1936 Justice Anthony Kennedy born July 23, 1936 Justice Stephen Breyer born August 15, 1938 If Hillary Clinton is elected President in 2016, and is able to replace Ginsberg, Breyer, and either Kennedy or Scalia, she will lock in a very young liberal court for many decades to come. ”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/11897#efmAGLAQD

264

OTR21

11939

More UFO stuffs

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/11939

265

OTR22

12194

Bonner group donor list

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12194

266

OTR23

12226

HRC Campain discussing new slogan/tag line for marketing

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12226

267

OTR24

12245

setting up the campaign structure in 2014

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12245

268

OTR25

12254

– staff orientation early 2015, what member heads what. shane.hable@gmail.com runs cyber security for the campaign

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12254

269

OTR26

12262

Re: just another day at the ofc…

Subject: Re: just another day at the ofc…

Doubled Robby’s time.

On Oct 15, 2015 8:47 PM, “Sara Latham” slatham@hillaryclinton.com wrote:

keg stand competition at HFA – JDP, wins !!

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12262

270

OTR27

12270

Outline for a strategic consulting company that does all sorts of shilling for HRC and includes business and academic minds for legitamacy. “A damn good memo, I must say. It was written early 2003. The date on the memo is weird.”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12270

271

OTR28

12280

“Draft Media Prep Plan”. We are preparing clips of her best interviews to show her. Also compiling her worst and analyzing for triggers and her reactions. [so many to choose from]

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12280

272

OTR29

15201

Huma Abedin checking with Robby Mook and AG Loretta Lynch about HRC attending a dinner hosted by George Soros and America Votes. Mook says ” I would only do this for political reasons (ie to make Soros happy)”

https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/15201

273

OTR30

15319

EMAILID 15319 John Podesta gets an email signed as “Barack Obama”. Podesta being someone pretty important, probably expected something better but this is essentially a spam begging for donations with parts such as “Today, if you’re ready to make these choices and meet the challenges that face us, pitch in $3 or whatever you can to become an official State of the Union Donor.” Even the leaders of the campaign are not exempt from getting Democrat Spam.

https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/15319

274

OTR31

15319

EMAILID 15319 John Podesta gets an email signed as “Barack Obama”. Podesta being someone pretty important, probably expected something better but this is essentially a spam begging for donations with parts such as “Today, if you’re ready to make these choices and meet the challenges that face us, pitch in $3 or whatever you can to become an official State of the Union Donor.” Even the leaders of the campaign are not exempt from getting Democrat Spam.

https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/15319

275

OTR32

15464

>I am very happy because this is the best realistic result to come out of Paris. Now we can truly say that the Republicans are the only thing standing in the way of literally saving civilization. If they don’t
cooperate then it is no longer hyperbole to say that they are truly enemies
of the state, enemies of the world. I am so happy I can say to my kids, yeah, people have finally gotten around to doing the right thing. It’s not all corrupt. There is a chance. I’m not naive enough to think that this is the solution, but just a new beginning. Too late? Yes, should have happened years ago. But finally, a plan for real action. I’m totally one hundred percent for Hillary because if any one of these bozos makes it to the White House, then we’ll have a revolution on our hands.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/15464#efmAGSAIN

276

OTR33

15589

virtual currency donations

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/15589

277

OTR34

15616

Tim Cook was listed as a possible VP pick!!

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/15616#efmAV_AWH

278

OTR35

15824

Michelle Kwan is in on it

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/15824

279

OTR36

23586

HRC gets jokes written for her

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/23586

280

OTR37

24257

HRC Campaign thinks her laugh is weird

“Laughing too hard is her authentic weirdness.”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/24257

281

OTR38

25823

MORE INFO ABOUT 527 ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE & SOMEONE NAMED HAMBURGER

“I am scheduled to speak with him tomoorow….doesn’t sound like there is much else to cover. (I want to keep the distinction between DA and FFA clear for him.) I know he wants to discuss fundraising and budgets. I think we are best served by steering people away from the $200 million number. MV- for future reference you can send 527 media requests to Amy Dacey. Hamburger called my home recently. I will call him back and give him > nothing of substance on background just so he feels like I’m not > evading him. > > Media vs field isn’t what is drawing attention. “527” is a tarnished > brand smartly attacked by the Right Wing since they use c4’s, LLC’s > and c6’s as their vehicles which operate almost invisibly. > > The Republicans are trying to sniff out what is going on and frame > their attackers before the attacks start. (Like Obama is right now.) > > We are still staying silent on the work. There is no advantage to > discussing strategy one way or another in the media. However we should > fill the vacuum once the primaries subside. I think Hamburger has > enough to write on for now.”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/25823

282

OTR39

26295

Re: DRAFT: Opening Statement

Long discussion chain to come up with opening statement for Benghazi committee

https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/26295

283

OTR40

26511

DISCUSSING SHARING OFFICE SPACE AND GOLDMAN SACHS AS LESSOR AND WHAT HRC WILL DO AFTER STATE DEPT

From:Huma@clintonemail.com
To: lgraham@clintonfoundation.org, cheryl.mills@gmail.com
Date: 2011-11-14 22:59
Subject: RE: Office Space

“As you and I discussed Friday, we are still identifying activities hrc could be involved in once she leaves the State Department.”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/26511

284

OTR41

26765

Subject: REVISED Strategy Memo

3rd Debate strategy attached

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/26765

285

OTR42

27006

EMAILID 27006 Huma Abedin writes that they have to send Katy Perry to do an Arkansas event because Hillary is unwilling to ask her daughter to go. Katy Perry is such a puppet for them that they can use her as a replacement for Chelsea when needed.

“She said no to asking Chelsea. Would go herself before asking her daughter. So we are at plan B: Katy Perry it is.”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/27006

286

OTR43

27076

Glen S. Fukushima seems to be a person working with Center for American Progress (CAP) and Neera Tanden who is one of the most prolific emailers in these leaks. Glen is planning a trip for Neera to Japan and as a part of that trip there will be an opportunity to collect campaign contributions. Glen wants to arrange donations from some “high net worth American business executives” to Hillary Clinton, but he has one big concern:

“How do I ensure that I am given “credit” for having gotten these individuals to contribute to HRC’s campaign? Is there a manual or set of guidelines you can send me on the do’s and don’ts of being a bundler for HRC?”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/27076

287

OTR44

27293

TALKING ABOUT DENNIS BLAIR, DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE

From:Robert.Gibbs@ptt.gov
To: Rahm.Emanuel@ptt.gov, axelrodfam@aol.com, ‘john.podesta@gmail.com’
Date: 2008-11-26 02:21
Subject: For Monday

“Shouldn’t we also roll out Blair as DNI?”

TALKING ABOUT DENNIS BLAIR, DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/27293

288

OTR45

28839

Fundraising in Japan RE: Do you honestly want me to do a fundraiser in Japan?

Between Neera Tandeen and John Podesta
“Do you honestly want me to do a fundraiser in Japan? If it comes to pass, do we connect with Dennis? or some minion in finance?”

Other names mentioned: Dennis and Glenn

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/28839

289

OVS

Offensive Voter Statements

290

OVS1

141

CTR Nerd Virgins

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/141

291

OVS2

927

>Hillary Clinton: “I’m Kind of Far Removed from Struggles of Middle Class” & http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/wikileaks-bombshell-hillary-clinton-im-kind-far-removed-struggles-middle-class/

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/927#efmAIuAMKAViAXv

292

OVS3

1637

>Racist Hillary Camp Trashes African Americans – Calls Them Losers & http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/wikileaks-bombshell-racist-hillary-trashes-african-americans-calls-losers/

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/1637

293

OVS4

2893

$15 min wage an hour will kill jobs – liberal economists

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/2893

294

OVS5

3154

Planning to make jokes regarding the server scandle

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3154

295

OVS6

3188

HRC CAMPAIGN CALLING BERNIE SUPPORTERS “BEDWETTERS”

Steve Elmendorf
wrote:

> We won. Raising money today, talking the bedwetters off the ledge

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3188

296

OVS7

4433

>Hillary Advisors Admit She “HATES EVERYDAY AMERICANS” & http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/wikileaks-bombshell-hillary-advisors-admit-hates-everyday-americans/

https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4433

297

OVS8

10090

Deploy National Guard to streets

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/10090

298

OVS9

11152

The way to sure up the “black vote” is not to address the needs of the community but to hire a black person for a senior position. lol, this will communicate that she does appreciate the “black vote”.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/11152#efmAKuAN5

299

OVS10

13776

her efforts in the black community are not resonating

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/13776

300

OVS11

15360

The big debate in the Democratic Party is what’s the best way to do this? Just take it from people who have it and give it to the government and let them give it to everybody else, or start the whole new round of innovations while growing small business, growing the economy, raising incomes? It’s a legitimate debate.

Talking about how you raise the incomes of poor people.

Hillary’s the only person who’s come up with a plan to see where it’s migrated, because even in small towns in rural America now you’ve got prescription drug problems. And now that we’ve cracked down on the abuses, heroin is cheaper than prescription drugs. Why? Because it’s now being grown in Mexico and harvested by preteens and it can be distributed. And if you go into all these small towns in rural America, where there’s no economic activity, you see it running rampant.

Admitting Mexican drug running is a problem.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/15360

301

OVS12

16492

16492 Just an email showing how the campaign thinks of police brutality and the deaths of black people: political fodder

Date: 2016-02-27 16:45

Subject: Re: Police brutality – you tube video

On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 1:39 PM Neera Tanden ntanden@gmail.com wrote:

Do you guys have the Video of Hillary challenging Rudy Giuliani on the

death of Patrick dorismond at hands of police. She did it in a black church

in Harlem in March of 2000. Pretty strong as I recall. It helped turn the

race. It would be good to answer where she was before.

Maybe it was too political. I might have the actual speech in the attic

but it got fair amount of NYC coverage

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/16492

302

OVS13

24148

HRC IMPLYING MILLENIALS ARE SWAYED BY CELEBRITIES LIKE MINDLESS DRONES

From: *Vincent Roberti*
Date: Monday, February 1, 2016
Subject: Exceeding expectation is always a good thing!
To: John Podesta

“You are in better place going in to new Hampshire than you were in eight years ago. Take the gloves off and figure out recapturing the 18 to 35 year vote later. Set up a separate recapture program tomorrow. We can help with a parallel program with a celebrity out reach tomorrow.”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/24148

303

OVS14

25735

Damage control after Hillary pissed off the entire LGBTQ community by her remarks at Nancy Reagan’s funeral. Her staff wrote and edited her entire speech to “clarify” her position. They openly discuss how they need to go back and smooth over relations with that group, where and how to message, etc.

http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2016/03/11/hillary-clinton-lauds-reagans-on-aids-a-backlash-erupts/

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/25735

304

SI

Self-Incrimination/Public Image Destruction

305

SI1

225

Hillary team concerned about discussions of her Russian Uranium deal

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/225

306

SI2

370

“We got a few stories placed today debunking claims in the book ahead of the NYT story” & ” But I have asked Jeremy Bash and Tommy Vietor to go on cable tomorrow for us to respond to the book. I think they will both be good at dismissing the charges as ridiculous. ” Tldr. lying about Uranium 1 book and placing false stories with the media

https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/370

307

SI3

927

>Hillary bragged about being invited to Russia’s Putin’s ‘Inner Sanctum’ & http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2016/10/11/wikileaks-clinton-bragged-putin-taking-private-inner-sanctum/ & (attachment) – https://ia801509.us.archive.org/19/items/HRCPaidSpeechesFlags/HRC%20Paid%20Speeches%20Flags.pdf

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/927

308

SI4

1210

The campaign was incredibly, incredibly worried about the film ‘Clinton Cash’. This is a list of the coverage it got (one of many e-mails pertaining to the film).

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/1210

309

SI5

1381

>Robby Mook: “it’s a little troubling” that meeting of Clinton Foundation was held at Goldman Sachs HQ & https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/784783850799001601

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/1381

310

SI6

1702

New theory: https://vault.fbi.gov/hillary-r.-clinton/hillary-r.-clinton-part-04-of-04/view Go to page 56. TL;DR: Some people make up a shadow goverment comprised of some high ranking people like John Kerry, Jonathan Finer and others who meet up on this “7th floor” where they discuss clinton and the congress

Cool, right? Now go to:

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/10094

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/1702

They mention a 7th floor in Washington which seems to be the meet up place
SUMMER 2010 BIDDING OPPORTUNITIES IN THE BUREAU OF LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS
H offers career-enhancing, Seventh Floor positions in which you can have a direct, substantive impact in achieving our foreign policy goals.

Literally right at the start of the document

SEEKING BIDDERS

They are selling positions of power.

New FBI leaks confirm the existence of the “shadow government”.

“There was a powerful group of very high-ranking STATE officials that some referred to as ‘The 7th Floor Group’ or ‘The Shadow Government.’ This group met every Wednesday afternoon to discuss the FOIA process, Congressional records, and everything CLINTON-related to FOIA/Congressional inquiries,” the FBI’s interview summary said.”

http://www.trunews.com/article/the-shadow-government-is-real-according-to-the-fbi

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/1702 & https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/09STATE89125_a.html

311

SI7

2175

Hijacking here with the leaked BIRD DOGGING EMAILS mentioned by Mr. O’Keefe:
“Bird dogging” is Democrat code for using plants to incite mayhem at events of political opponents

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/2175

312

SI8

2301

>Bill Clinton sex “allegations are hurting both Clintons”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/2301

313

SI9

2631

HRC & WJC against gay marriage

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/2631

314

SI10

2783

>Hillary accepting foreign money

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/2783

315

SI11

2953

Worried about Hillary’s health getting attention: “Hard to think of anything more counter productive than demanding Bernie’s medical records.”:

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/2953#efmAAvACJ

316

SI12

2986

Hillary Clinton decided on Tim Kaine as VP in July 2015. “A little unseemly.” (She didn’t officially announce Tim Kaine as her VP publicly until July 2016) & http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/wikileaks-email-hillary-clinton-decided-tim-kaine-vp-july-2015/

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/2986#efmABHAB3AB6ACN

317

SI13

3154

>Hillary’s team doesn’t know what’s in her emails and is nervous about it

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3154

318

SI14

3332

Working for the Clintons drives staff to suicide attempts

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3332#efmAdAAmB

319

SI15

3599

>”we’ve all been quite content to demean government, drop civics and in general conspire to produce an unaware and compliant citizenry. The unawareness remains strong but compliance is obviously fading rapidly.”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3599

320

SI16

3718

>Top Clinton donor paid $250 million for tax evasion / https://twitter.com/AmericanMex067/status/786020856749096960

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3718

321

SI17

3774

>Hillary Admits Saudi Arabia and Qatar Fund ISIS – But Took Their Money Anyway & http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/wikileaks-hillary-admits-saudi-arabia-qatar-fund-isis-took-money-anyway/

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3774

322

SI18

3833

Hijacking here with the leaked BIRD DOGGING EMAILS mentioned by Mr. O’Keefe:
“Bird dogging” is Democrat code for using plants to incite mayhem at events of political opponents

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3833

323

SI19

3855

Lying about turning over thumb drives

https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3855#efmBemBnB

324

SI20

4036

This is how you create a fake grassroots movement.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4036

325

SI21

4099

Hillary deleted some emails herself

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4099

326

SI22

4274

>Hillary reads script during interview. & >https://twitter.com/PrisonPlanet/status/786141677106765826

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4274

327

SI23

4364

>Hillary’s Communications Director Jennifer Palmieri TRASHES CATHOLICS. Clinton Staff mocking conservative catholics. Advisor to Podesta: “severely backwards gender relations” “they think it is the most socially acceptable politically conservative religion.”: … & http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/wikileaks-emails-hillarys-communications-director-jennifer-palmieri-trashes-catholics/

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4364

328

SI24

4632

Obama requesting that people’s profiles be scrubbed from a website

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4632

329

SI25

4635

>CROOKS: Clinton Campaign Chief Owned 75,000 Shares of Putin-Connected Energy Company & https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/786691843811577856 & http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/crooks-clinton-campaign-chief-owned-75000-shares-putin-connected-energy-company/ & http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/10/13/wikileaks-bombshell-john-podesta-owned-75000-shares-putin-connected-energy-company/

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4635

330

SI26

4697

Why doesnt Hillary turn the server over to a third party? (Staffers believe the FBI will leak the emails)

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4697

331

SI27

4990

Elmendorf and Podesta discussing removal of emails after 3-6 months

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4990

332

SI28

5194

Top Secret Emails Include Drone Talk

https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/5194

333

SI29

5213

>Hillary’s people worried Chelsea Clinton sharing information with Bush daughter about Clinton’s corruption & https://twitter.com/mtracey/status/786530411820101632

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/5213

334

SI30

5332

HRC campaign collaborating and picking board members for a super PAC
(illegal as hell) DIRECT COLLUSION!!

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/5332

335

SI31

5344

>Hillary trying to get in front of email issue / https://twitter.com/PrisonPlanet/status/785835370013425664

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/5344

336

SI32

5469

>Huma admits Foreign Interests own HRC & https://twitter.com/WDFx2EU7/status/786200896279486464

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/5469#efmCAtCDf

337

SI33

5479

John Podesta receives Hillary’s “personal” tweets for approval a few days in advance of the tweets going online. Staff writes them:

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/5479

338

SI34

5486

HUGE, INTENT AND EXPRESSION OF GUILT

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/5486

339

SI35

5690

>Biden Aide Sabotaged His Presidential Aspirations? & http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/12/email-suggests-biden-aide-sabotaged-his-presidential-aspirations-to-help-hillary/

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/5690

340

SI36

5690

Ron Klaine (Joe Biden chief of staff) betrays Joe Biden and acts as a mole for Clinton camp. (Note: Ron Klaine was former Chief of staff for Al Gore in 1999 and was let go because of his conflict of interest/ loyalty to the Clintons) Joe Biden was rumored to replace Hillary Clinton as the nominee. “I am definitely dead to them but I’m glad to be on team HRC”:

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/5690#efmACsAE4

341

SI37

5705

>But I should say that I would do whatever Hillary needs always. I owe her a lot. And I’m a loyal soldier

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/5705

342

SI38

6008

>Podesta Documents Suggest Scalia Assassination & http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/wikileaks-uncover-murder-plot-podesta-documents-suggest-scalia-assassination/

https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/6008

343

SI39

6185

State Department tipping off Hillary’s staff about upcoming investigation details regarding her case:

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/6185#efmAH_AJdANKAPC

344

SI40

6293

>Podesta and Left-Wing Activist Plot ‘Catholic Spring’ & http://www.lifezette.com/polizette/wikileaks-podesta-left-wing-activist-plot-catholic-spring/

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/6293

345

SI41

6370

Worrying about Hillary’s low turnout at events:

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/6370#efmAU2AWj

346

SI42

6391

>Hillary team discussed deleting emails knowing it was against the law / >Hillary Campaign Was in Touch with Obama DOJ on Email Investigation / https://twitter.com/mtracey/status/786217317881507841/photo/1 / http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/wikileaks-bomb-clinton-camp-discussed-deleting-emails-despite-knowing-law/

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/6391

347

SI43

6391

>Clinton Staffers Discussed Which Emails To Release and delete / http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/12/podesta-hacks-shows-clinton-staffers-discussing-which-emails-to-release/ / https://twitter.com/mtracey/status/786217317881507841/photo/1 / http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/wikileaks-bomb-clinton-camp-discussed-deleting-emails-despite-knowing-law/

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/6391

348

SI44

6668

UNIONS I think that John is going to be meeting with Trumka on Friday in DC and we’ll know more after that. I agree that a vote should only be called if we know we’ll get it. Otherwise, its not worth it. I’m also surprised that Bernie hasn’t peeled more unions off. I think that’s significant. If unions like ATU, CWA or APWU are going to raise a big stink it would be easier to do if they officially endorsed. But they haven’t

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/6668

349

SI45

6777

John Podesta tells Hillary Clinton she needs to reach out to “needy Latinos”:

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/6777

350

SI46

6971

INTENT: I know this email thing isn’t on the level. I’m fully aware of that.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/6971

351

SI47

7011

>Hillary’s own campaign doesn’t understand why she deleted 33,000 emails & https://twitter.com/latinaafortrump/status/786656783666323456

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/7011

352

SI48

7011

H doesnt recall why deleted the emails

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/7011

353

SI49

7136

>Chelsea Clinton (CVC) Busted Stealing from Clinton Foundation!!! & https://twitter.com/HalleyBorderCol/status/786678797986828288

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/7136

354

SI50

7243

>Hillary sends intel to Podesta on unsecured server & https://twitter.com/SandraTXAS/status/786779688744185856

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/7243

355

SI51

7460

INTENT: Our position is that no such material exists, else it could be said she mishandled classified info

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/7460

356

SI52

7460

>Hillary’s staffers discuss how there exists classified emails but how they should deny they ever existed

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/7460#content

357

SI53

7655

>Benghazi opening statement (see attachments)

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/7655

358

SI54

7660

>Hillary’s script for the emails discussion. Note the bit where she talks about all her security prep that her state department does in this leaked (and possibly hacked) email.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/7660

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/8396

359

SI55

7741

DWS/Hillary broker out convention CEO march 2015

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/7741

360

SI56

7796

Hillary’s campaign manager Robby Mook, to other staff, calls New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio a “terrorist” after Bill de Blasio stalls on his endorsement for Hillary Clinton during an interview:

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/7796#efmABDACG

361

SI57

7881

>Hillary’s attorney David Kendall did not turn over thumb drive and server / https://twitter.com/BinsackSb/status/785714200609824768

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/7881

362

SI58

7976

>”The sooner Hillary gets that life is not fair, the better off she will be. I thought she understood this before this race, but apparently I was wrong.”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/7976

363

SI59

8190

Citigroup chose Obama’s 2008 cabinet

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/8190

364

SI60

8396

Qatar give WJC 1 million dollars for his birthday

365

SI61

8396

Bill got a $1million birthday present from Qutar

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/8396#efmAAGABSAEOAETAEaAGWAGaAHZAJBAJd

366

SI62

8440

>Clinton Campaign Fudged Climate Change Data – Inflated Emission Numbers & http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/wikileaks-clinton-campaign-fudged-climate-change-data-inflated-emission-numbers/

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/8440

367

SI63

8452

8452 Hillary Clinton flipped her public position on TPP after her team discussed how she would be “eaten alive” by Labor

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/8452#efmAH1APRA0NA5c

368

SI64

8567

From: Glenn Hutchins

the capacity of labor to demand a greater share of profits from productivity gains have been overwhelmed by several factors: 1) globalized wage competition as incomes have slowly equilibrated around the world

From:ntanden@americanprogress.org To: glenn.hutchins@gmail.com

>Isn’t stagnant wage (for the bottom 90%) part of the reason we have rising inequality?

Translation: Globalization is causing poverty and destruction of the middle class in the US and the HRC campaign KNOWS AND SUPPORTS IT!

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/8567

369

SI65

8762

United States Deputy Secretary of Labor (Chris Lu) sends Education Policy Promises draft in an email cc:’ed with bankers and firms. (Large corporations & banks providing input in US law?):

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/8762

370

SI66

8961

>Hillary didn’t like ‘bitch’ in the interview & https://twitter.com/karey_donna/status/786773742450044928

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/8961

371

SI67

9101

Comparing Benghazi deaths to cigarette smoker deaths

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9101

372

SI68

9127

Possible collusion with AG loretta. Richard J. Leon, works at Georgetown with Podesta, HRC.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9127

373

SI69

9161

HRC ILLEGAL ACTIVITY WITH SUPERPAC

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9161

374

SI70

9174

Email regarding Scalia the same day he died

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9174

375

SI71

9181

That she says no backdoor, but then says we need a way in, and then the bad line about not understanding technology

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9181

376

SI72

9252

Hillary’s team trying to draft an official statement to congress “has it leaked yet?”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9252

377

SI73

9272

EVIDENCE HILLARY DID NOT SUBMIT ALL EMAILS— INTENT PROVEN – PRESS COLLUSION WITH INTENT TO CONFUSE CONGRESS PROVEN

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9272

378

SI74

9290

Trying to hide wallstreet Associations

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9290

379

SI75

9368

Hiding 1 Billion campaign chest information

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9368

380

SI76

9399

WJC and HRC disagree on TPP. internal strife in campaign on “having it both ways”

https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9399#searchresult

381

SI77

9507

terrorism is bad for HRC gun grab

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9507

382

SI78

9545

Proof Obama knew about HRC server. Withholding Obama’s emails same day as subpoena issued.

383

SI79

9572

HRC suboptimal instincts & Obama cocaine ring

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9572

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9545

384

SI80

9769

We likely already have a contract but given that he’s a friend of Hillary’s and a former congressman, we should probably give him a phone call.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9769

385

SI81

9961

BIG: Pay for play for ambassadors

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9961

386

SI82

9997

>tennis me to discuss use of email

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9997

387

SI83

10094

New theory: https://vault.fbi.gov/hillary-r.-clinton/hillary-r.-clinton-part-04-of-04/view Go to page 56. TL;DR: Some people make up a shadow goverment comprised of some high ranking people like John Kerry, Jonathan Finer and others who meet up on this “7th floor” where they discuss clinton and the congress

Cool, right? Now go to:

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/10094

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/1702

They mention a 7th floor in Washington which seems to be the meet up place
SUMMER 2010 BIDDING OPPORTUNITIES IN THE BUREAU OF LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS
H offers career-enhancing, Seventh Floor positions in which you can have a direct, substantive impact in achieving our foreign policy goals.

Literally right at the start of the document

SEEKING BIDDERS

They are selling positions of power.

New FBI leaks confirm the existence of the “shadow government”.

“There was a powerful group of very high-ranking STATE officials that some referred to as ‘The 7th Floor Group’ or ‘The Shadow Government.’ This group met every Wednesday afternoon to discuss the FOIA process, Congressional records, and everything CLINTON-related to FOIA/Congressional inquiries,” the FBI’s interview summary said.”

http://www.trunews.com/article/the-shadow-government-is-real-according-to-the-fbi

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/10094 & https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/09STATE89125_a.html

388

SI84

10275

>Subject: History of Juanita Broaddrick Allegations

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/10275

389

SI85

10289

Cheryl Mills admits that no one likes HRC!!!!!!

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/10289

390

SI86

10359

>We have a problem. HRC overstayed her case this morning in a pretty big way. Marcia, Judy and I have been figuring out what we could say that doesn’t contradict their 2001 statement. But my other idea is to have women Senators who all voted for it to put out statement.

>What did she say that was wrong?

>She said women groups were all pressuring her to vote for it. Evidence does not support that statement.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/10359

391

SI87

10451

INSIDER TRADING? From: *Tiernan Sittenfeld*
Date: Monday, March 14, 2016
Subject: Atlantic/Arctic tomorrow
To: John Podesta “Totally confidential but in case you haven’t heard they are announcing 5 year drilling plan tomorrow late morning”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/10451.html

392

SI88

10735

UNIONS This is deeper than that, our union “endorsed” HRC without speaking to the members and when confronted we were told it was a done deal. One of the few unions to endorse Bernie was Verizon…. and they got shafted in contract negotiations. It was a clear message to the other unions that if you didn’t bow you were on your own. Looks like the longshorement don’t like their struggle being used to push HRC’s “civil rights” agenda.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/10735

393

SI89

11011

>Goldman Sachs paid speeches (see attachments for 1-3)

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/11011

394

SI90

11131

HRC/DNC Joint bank account. HIGHLY ILLEGAL!

From:re47@hillaryclinton.com
To: hdr29@hrcoffice.com
Madame Secretary,

…I wanted to get your blessing to move forward with the DNC joint account. We didn’t get a chance to cover that on our call. I’m obviously happy to have a conversation about it if you want–or move forward. I’m happy with the arrangement and believe it’s important to our money and operational strategies.

Thanks, Robby

https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/11131

395

SI91

11136

Neera Tanden

I know this email thing isn’t on the level. I’m fully aware of that. But her inability to just do a national interview and communicate genuine feelings of remorse and regret is now, I fear, becoming a character problem (more so than honesty).

John Podesta

Jen and I are in the same place. Trying to figure out how to get her there and best way to execute.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/11136

396

SI92

11136

11136 Neera Tanden admits: “I know this email thing isn’t on the level. I’m fully aware of that. But her inability to just do a national interview and communicate genuine feelings of remorse and regret is now, I fear, becoming a character problem (more so than honesty). People hate her arrogant, like her down. It’s a sexist context, but I think it’s the truth.”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/11136#efmAC0AGw

397

SI93

11138

Self-Research — spoke to HRC. As we discussed, her definition of what she sees remaining with personal lawyers and HFS is the narrow areas we discussed (e.g., taxes, health, finances/speeches, family) though she added BZ. I shared that HFS can continue to manage in partnership with outside personal counsel (including DEK, HT, me) but that self-research as a whole (and explained the larger paradigm) should be in NY and run by someone sitting in NYC,with which she agreed. We discussed HFS; she wants her doing these areas, vetting, and personnel from a perch in the Legal Counsel operation or the COO operation — RM let’s discuss so it is consistent with your vision, organizational paradigm and goals.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/11138

398

SI94

11152

EMAILID 11152 from someone named fwj to Podesta Re: black vote ” The black is obvious super critical. Im hearing the same complaint in political circles that i continue to hear while fundraising. “The campaign doesnt value black folks and takes us for granted”.”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/11152

399

SI95

11164

Podesta staffer sends email from Podesta’s email. Podesta has Top Secret clearance and staffer doesn’t.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/11164

400

SI96

11305

My only concern is stating the article inflicted damage on our campaign. Certainly true but I worry that if we leak the letter, it could be misinterpreted as us admitting the email controversy in general is hurting us. Maybe we could soften it a bit by saying “…creating a firestorm that had a deep impact and cannot be unwound.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/11305

401

SI97

11393

Clinton staffers admitting they have a thumb drive that they did not turn over to the State dept. But they plan on crafting her public statement to imply they did.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/11393#efmBD1BFy

402

SI98

11446

EMAIL 11446 Someone named Scott Wallace, likely the guy in this article http://archive.is/9NsDI writes to John Podesta, apparently he wants to become US Ambassador to South Africa. : “I know you must have a million things on your plate, but as I mentioned to you, Elizabeth and Smith Bagley were encouraging me to reach out to you sooner rather than later about a possible appointment in an Obama administration… I am passionate about helping South Africa achieve its full promise, and see its upcoming elections and the next couple of years as critical to the health of its democracy. It has become my second country, and I would be deeply honored to be considered to represent President Obama as ambassador there.” He also has a plan B: “Of course, if it is determined that there are other areas where my background may be better put to use, I am happy to discuss them as well. .. My full CV is attached.”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/11446#efmAVuAWxAZAAac

403

SI99

11457

Clinton foundation discussing sharing office space with Goldman Sachs in 2011.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/11457

404

SI100

11464

“I joined a phone bank last night calling Virginia voters – nearly all of > my electronic call sheets were for people over 60, with many in their late > 80s and 90s. It caused me to have another sleepless night, anxious about > the campaign.”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/11464

405

SI101

11472

Chelsea Clinton is a bitch. “As they say, the apple doesn’t fall far A kiss on the cheek while she is sticking a knife in the back, and front ” & “Diane Reynolds” is Chelsea Clinton’s nom de corruption.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/11472

406

SI102

11497

Clinton foundation discussing sharing office space with Goldman Sachs in 2011.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/11497

407

SI103

11500

EMAILID 11500 Podesta is concerned about a murderer’s politically unfortunate name : “NBC News now reporting a US citizen named Sayeed Farouk believed to be one of the people involved in the shooting.” Podesta responds: “Better if a guy named Sayeed Farouk was reporting that a guy named Christopher Hayes was the shooter.”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/11500

408

SI104

11525

11525 Hillary campaign talking about manipulating Reddit and discusses possible ways to exploit Reddit for their benefit : “Our other option is Reddit, which has an extremely vocal core of LGBT members, but I would prioritize this Facebook group, which is the largest LGBT community of Hillary’s supporters I know. These are friendlies, they are already carrying water for us making sure the apology is out there, and they firmly sit in groups 1 and 2 that Dom identified. Whatever we did to send our LGBT talking points to folks has really worked, they are popping up everywhere on the supporter Facebook groups.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/11525#efmJEMJMC

409

SI105

11539

Maybe she could do Funny or Die w/ Meyl Streep w/ the Galyfinakis (can’t spell his name for he life of me) w it her. That would be Hilarious! And I still think she should do Season Opening of SNL. She hates this shit, but at the end of the day, nothing will move her personal numbers more.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/11539

410

SI106

11563

Covering up the hiring of Robby Mook. “Yes. We need to kill that baby in the cradle.”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/11563

411

SI107

11563

EMAILID 11563 #HillarysHealth might be really bad : “Have you talked with her at all about taxes and health? I’m know both are hyper sensitive but I wonder if both are better dealt with very early so we control them”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/11563

412

SI108

11563

HRC campaign distorting HRC true health. “Have you talked with her at all about taxes and health? I’m know both are hyper sensitive but I wonder if both are better dealt with very early so we control them–rather than responding to calls for transparency.”

https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/11563

413

SI109

11580

In the last 48 hours a) Hillary and her campaign have begun to question Bernie’s integrity and b) older feminists are beginning a civil war against younger women with idiot comments such as younger women support Bernie to get laid. What would be the reaction if Bill Clinton, George Bush or Harry Reid comments such as this? Or that younger women must support Hillary for the sole reason that she is a woman?

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/11580

414

SI110

11580

The idea of the campaign for the candidate who could become the first woman president initiating a civil war between older women and younger women over her candidacy is political malpractice that leaves me speechless.

My phone is ringing off the hook with establishment Democrats who she thinks support her, who are appalled and alarmed by the kind of campaign she is running….more than one of them has said I could quote them by name, that’s how appalled and alarmed they are, and I told them to calm down and tell the Clintons directly what they think, but not go public right now….

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/11580

415

SI111

11915

11915 Big discussion inside the Hillary campaign whether to take money from people who are registered as “foreign agents” according to the FARA, the Foreign Agents Registration Act. The final decision? taking the money from foreign agents: “Hi all – we do need to make a decision on this ASAP as our friends who happen to be registered with FARA are already donating and raising.” Robby Mook-“I’m ok just taking the money and dealing with any attacks. Are you guys ok with that?” Palmieri “Take the money!!”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/11915#efmAvrAx1

416

SI112

11915

HILLARY CLINTON CAMPAIGN FOUND TAKING BRIBES FROM FOREIGN POWERS TO FUND HER ELECTION. THIS IS TREASON AND DISQUALIFIES HER FROM BEING ELECTED TO OFFICE BY UNITED STATES FEDERAL LAW.

FBI IS IN ABSOLUTE SHITFACED TURMOIL OVER THE FACT THAT THE FBI DIRECTOR COMEY ACTUALLY LET HILLARY GO WHEN THE ACTUAL AGENTS WORKING ON THE CASE HAD MASSES OF RESEARCH AND EVIDENCE AGAINST HER. THE ENTIRE ORGANIZATION FEELS SO BETRAYED THEY’RE SEEKING TO REMOVE THE DIRECTOR FROM HIS POSITION.

http://spectator.org/former-u-s-attorney-agents-see-fbi-chief-comey-as-a-dirty-cop/
AND LAST BUT CERTAINLY NOT LEAST. CATHY O’BRIEN, RECORDED IN 1996 WITH CLAIMS THAT SHE WAS TIED UP AND BOUND AS A 9 YEAR OLD GIRL, AND FORCED TO PERFORM ORAL SEXUAL ACTS UPON HILLARY CLINTON. SHE EVEN WROTE A FUCKING BOOK ABOUT FULL OF COURT RECORDS TO BACK UP EVERY STATEMENT SHE’S MADE.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-SSa9tTa0-k [Embed] [Embed]
https://www.amazon.com/Access-Denied-Reasons-National-Security/dp/096601653X

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/11915

417

SI113

11915

One of the foreign donors mentioned in the mail (only 23 listed of the 300+ donors):

“The Following Up and Recovering of the Libyan Looted and Disguised Funds of the Transitional Government of Libya, through Washington African Consulting Group, Inc (12/3/14 – Current)”

Washington African Consulting Group was appointed by the Libyan transitional government (installed by the USA probably) to recover all Gadaffi’s gold and money.

This money is now finding it’s way back into Hillary’s pocket.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/11915

418

SI114

12012

HRC Campaign & DNC breaking law regarding coordination with Super PACs

Rigging the Election Part I 10:59-11:04 Zulema Rodriguez says “I just had a call with the campaign and the DNC. Everyday at one o’clock.” https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5IuJGHuIkzY

“…Everyday at one o’clock.”

Wikileaks email id 12012 RE: Reminder — Trump Rapid Response/Bracketing Call — Today – Tues – May17 – 1PM Eastern (Thread was started by Bob Creamer and look at the others copied on it) https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/12012

‘1PM Eastern’

So much for the double blind.

https://m.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/58f9kx/i_just_discovered_more_proof_verifying_statements/?sort=confidence&utm_source=mweb_redirect&compact=true

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/12012

419

SI115

12105

12105 Memo revealing they were discussing the testimony of Cheryl Mills in meetings It must have been highly important to keep all of their stories straight, properly vetted and discussed. : “Please see below for today’s 8am meeting agenda. Also, please note that this meeting should last a full hour” Lists items to talk about “Timing of Focus Groups re Debate Prep” “8/31 Email Release” “Jake/Cheryl Testimony”.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12105#efmAC4ADoAHvAIE

420

SI116

12194

BONNER GROUP: Contributions from Linda Pritzer show up as $700,000 in the attached Excel sheet, but the FEC data shows no contributions in 2015 or 2016. Are they laundering money through the Bonner group?? This email is dated from 2008, thats why it doesn’t show up in 2015 or 2016.

Anything you’ve seen about The Bonner Group outside of wikileaks originated from me. I’ve been researching them and David Brock’s groups since July, and opened up a site to house my findings in September.

Relevant Bonner Articles:

They aren’t properly registered to solicit funds ANYWHERE: http://www.thecitizensaudit.com/2016/09/17/correct-the-record-unregistered-solicitation/

(remember how Trump Foundation was barred from raising funds in New York because they weren’t properly registered? That’s what’s happening with the Bonner Group, but in every state.)

Bonner Group Laundering Money through CTR and Brock’s organizations: http://www.thecitizensaudit.com/2016/09/19/money-laundering-david-brock/

Bonus Article

An explainer on Super PACs and what Coordination means. Don’t just repeat a talking point – become educated on WHY something is illegal. http://www.thecitizensaudit.com/2016/10/16/super-pac-coordination-an-explainer/

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12194

421

SI117

12194

Current commitment sheet from Bonner Group, sent to Podesta and Brock

$1.7c4 and $400K c3 so far with about 60 people left to decide

edit: attached is a spreadsheet of names, numbers, and amounts of money to PA, MMFA, and CAP.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12194

422

SI118

12223

UNIONS Big Labor Update. HUGE Update on Union efforts by HRC campaign.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12223

423

SI119

12245

Seems clear that Clinton’s campaign was gearing up big-time as early as December 2014. Is this a massive breach of FEC rules? “From: Robert Mook robbymook@gmail.com Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 8:01:13 PM To: Huma Abedin Cc: John Podesta; Cheryl Mills Subject: Re: Update We had a good meeting today to ratify the research plan and discuss staffing structure and talent. Few things to report out:”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12245

424

SI120

12247

– George Soros team purchasing things for Podesta like tickets, etc. in attachment

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12247

425

SI121

12256

– initial polling on what positions they should publicly take

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12256

426

SI122

12297

Nomi Prins: The Clintons and Their Banker Friends

No matter what spin is used for campaigning purposes, the idea that a critical distance can be maintained between the White House and Wall Street is naïve given the multiple channels of money and favors that flow between the two. It is even more improbable, given the history of connections that Hillary Clinton has established through her associations with key bank leaders in the early 1990s, during her time as a senator from New York, and given their contributions to the Clinton foundation while she was secretary of state. At some level, the situation couldn’t be less complicated: her path aligns with that of the country’s most powerful bankers. If she becomes president, that will remain the case

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12297

427

SI123

12342

EMAILID 12342 Tina Flournoy alerts John Podesta to a document that’s being released. There is some concern that Bill Clinton said something that could hurt the campaign. She sends it over as a PDF. It’s an old meeting between Blair and Clinton. Clinton talks about pretty much hating the refugees saying “on another level I don’t want any”: “Bill Clinton: I understand the problem. On the other hand, we have to take enough pressure of Macedonia and Albania so they don’t close the borders to keep their countries from coming apart. Talk to your folks. On one level, I’d like to take 100 thousand and put them in America tomorrow and run the risk of saying people don’t want to go home.** On another level, I don’t want any. They might like it here and not want to leave.**

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12342

428

SI124

12393

EMAILID 12393 Neera Tanden and John Podesta. They realize the email deletion will hurt them but they have no idea how much. They think it will quickly pass “I mean, they will go after the deleting of the private emails…but at some point, this just will have to run out of steam, especially as they see minimal electoral consequence. ” Podesta said “They will go after the server but that takes us back to Benghazi which is good for us”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12393

429

SI125

12393

EMAILID 12393 Neera Tanden and John Podesta. They realize the email deletion will hurt them but they have no idea how much. They think it will quickly pass “I mean, they will go after the deleting of the private emails…but at some point, this just will have to run out of steam, especially as they see minimal electoral consequence. ” Podesta said “They will go after the server but that takes us back to Benghazi which is good for us”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12393

430

SI126

12393

EMAILID 12393 They hope the emails will distract from Benghazi: They will go after the server but that takes us back to Benghazi which is good for us.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12393

431

SI127

12393

EMAILID 12393 Neera Tanden and John Podesta. They realize the email deletion will hurt them but they have no idea how much. They think it will quickly pass “I mean, they will go after the deleting of the private emails…but at some point, this just will have to run out of steam, especially as they see minimal electoral consequence. ” Podesta said “They will go after the server but that takes us back to Benghazi which is good for us”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12393

432

SI128

12401

EMAILID 12401 This seems big. Chelsea Clinton provides a list of concerns to the staff including John Podesta. Apparently several cases of surveillance and spying was going on between the employees. All of the names of persons will need to be identified and followed up on. There is a lot of information in just this one email: “Ilya physically saw/caught Justin a couple of days ago reading his bberry and loading the same spyware onto his computer that he loaded onto Bari’s computer” “- my father was told today of explicit examples at CGI of Doug/ Teneo pushing for – and receiving – free memberships – and of multiple examples of Teneo ‘hustling’ business at CGI – and of people now having quit at CGI” “- Ilya believes Hannah and Justin have taken significant sums of money from my parents personally – some in expenses – cars, etc. – and others directly”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12401#efmAXHAZp

433

SI129

12414

HRC Sick????????? “Two benefits of this revised plan – we have a better sense of press reactions before having her sit down and it is more time for her to be in right head space. Given where she is now, I don’t think it is realistic to expect that an interview on Monday would go well. Do also think there is a value in having staff take first round of questions on this.”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12414

434

SI130

12510

More evidence that Clinton staffers kept the most nefarious stuff they were doing off the written email record. “Subject: Sharpton Very good straightforward meeting. Rather download on a call.”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12510

435

SI131

12539

EMAILID 12539 Philippe Reines admits to the following about Hillary Clinton’s emails March 2015 : “To be clear, there are and will likely remain only two parties who can release the full 55k: State and us. Nobody else will have them. Gowdy will only end up with what’s relevant to his committee, which won’t grow that much beyond what he has. Probably not get anywhere close to 500.”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12539

436

SI132

12539

EMAILID 12539 Philippe Reines admits to the following about Hillary Clinton’s emails Marhc 2015 : “To be clear, there are and will likely remain only two parties who can release the full 55k: State and us. Nobody else will have them. Gowdy will only end up with what’s relevant to his committee, which won’t grow that much beyond what he has. Probably not get anywhere close to 500.”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12539

437

SI133

12539

State Dept. DOES have all of Hillary’s emails!!

To be clear, there are and will likely remain only two parties who can release the full 55k: State and us. Nobody else will have them. Gowdy will only end up with what’s relevant to his committee, which won’t grow that much beyond what he has. Probably not get anywhere close to 500.

If State had all her emails as of “Date: 2015-03-17 16:26” then either they still have them OR the *State Department Erased Hillary’s Emails As Well

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12539

438

SI134

12539

EMAILID 12539 Philippe Reines admmits to the following about Hillary Clinton’s emails March 2015 : “To be clear, there are and will likely remain only two parties who can release the full 55k: State and us. Nobody else will have them. Gowdy will only end up with what’s relevant to his committee, which won’t grow that much beyond what he has. Probably not get anywhere close to 500.”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12539

439

SI135

12605

Can’t send it securely? fuck it, change the header.

https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/12605

440

SI136

12803

Pay4play letters

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/12803

441

SI137

12803

fake craigslist post created by HRC team for “Trump Jobs” & “grope under the table ”

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/12803

442

SI138

12811

EMAILID 12811 Cheryl Mills sends out an article to Podesta and several others “Aide who accused Bill Clinton of groping her in White House claims ‘Hillary Clinton IS the war on women … she enabled his behavior’ Kathleen Willey claims President Clinton forced himself on her in a study near the Oval Office in 1993, insists that Hillary ‘enabled his behavior’ and then conducted a campaign to discredit her.” Tina Flournoy responds “Saw it last night and ignored it” Doesn’t seem like they were willing to believe the accounts from Bill Clinton’s victims. They simply ignored them.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12811#efmAAGAAm

443

SI139

12811

EMAILID 12811 Cheryl Mills sends out an article to Podesta and several others “Aide who accused Bill Clinton of groping her in White House claims ‘Hillary Clinton IS the war on women … she enabled his behavior’ Kathleen Willey claims President Clinton forced himself on her in a study near the Oval Office in 1993, insists that Hillary ‘enabled his behavior’ and then conducted a campaign to discredit her.” Tina Flournoy responds “Saw it last night and ignored it” Doesn’t seem like they were willing to believe the accounts from Bill Clinton’s victims. They simply ignored them.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12811#efmAAGAAm

444

SI140

13257

UNIONS These are from Nikki Budzinski HRC’s labor outreach coordinator. I agree we should push to keep those other unions neutral. Any word on their boards and if we can lobby members individually to block a vote?

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/13257

445

SI141

13355

Haim was on his way to Israel today, he and Alex will be on the call tomorrow Laura suggested this call be a check-in, rather than about super-delegates as suggested, I’ll explain offline in the morning.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/13355

446

SI142

13423

Clinton’s support of TPP, and and more evidence of public duplicity vs. private corporatism. On Mar 1, 2015, at 4:51 PM, Robby Mook robbymook2015@gmail.com wrote: I can’t recall where we landed exactly on trade. Is she going to say she supports it? Regardless of her position, signing a letter feels like poking the bear with labor to me.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/13423

447

SI143

13999

EMAILID 13999 More possible violations of campaign finance rules. Email to Podesta from Minh Nguyen :”I’m swinging way above my weight class here. And I’m 100% sure this out of protocol.I’m trying to land the campaign a big fat whale that can give between $100,000 to maybe $1 million if their ego can be reassured that they won’t be just treated “just like any other donor.With your permission, can I CC you in an email to these guys.I’m work with Haim Saban’s political director on these same guys. If it’s 100% inappropriate I understand.”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/13999#efmAClADMADOAEwAIPAI3

448

SI144

13999

EMAILID 13999 More possible violations of campaign finance rules. Email to Podesta from Minh Nguyen :”I’m swinging way above my weight class here. And I’m 100% sure this out of protocol.I’m trying to land the campaign a big fat whale that can give between $100,000 to maybe $1 million if their ego can be reassured that they won’t be just treated “just like any other donor.With your permission, can I CC you in an email to these guys.I’m work with Haim Saban’s political director on these same guys. If it’s 100% inappropriate I understand.”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/13999#efmAClADMADOAEwAIPAI3

449

SI145

14273

DAY OF Scalia’s death Podesta is talking with Soros’ guy about his replacement

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/14273

450

SI146

14294

Gowdy is focused on how her Benghazi emails are self-selected by her and therefore paint on an incomplete picture. He is not focused on the classified email, which is great.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/14294#efmAHHAJ6

451

SI147

14503

Did Clinton’s campaign have a mole on the Benghazi committee? Susanne Grooms is/was the Democratic legal counsel to the committee. There are other emails where the Clinton campaign is in contact with her getting info and dates. Here it seems like there is language that might indicate her contact with HRC’s campaign is illicit. “I just spoke with Susanne Grooms, who is resisting the idea of a telephone call. John, I am not sure David is available right now to discuss — is there a number where I can reach you? You can reach me at 202.434.5487. Thanks.”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/14503

452

SI148

14580

Evidence of Clinton Campaign lack of ethics in fundraising. Denigrates Obama people of being “prissy” [read: ethical]. Subject: Re: F.E.C. Can’t Curb 2016 Election Abuse, Commission Chief Says There is a stalemate among the agency’s six commissioners, who are perpetually locked in 3-to-3 ties along party lines because of a fundamental disagreement over the commission’s mandate. Adding Elias. I agree with you, John. I think we focus hard on raising as much as we can and then throw the kitchen sink at everyone who we believe steps over the line, understanding that has limited impact. On May 3, 2015, at 5:55 PM, John Podesta wrote: I have no magic solutions other than execution. Elias may have some legal ideas to slow them down. We have 3 things we have to do. Raise the primary $ by expanding the bundler network. Get Priorities functional. Use this to scare our people into giving bigger sums. We may need to get WJC into the mix sooner. We should also ask BHO to do more in light of this, although they are kind of prissy about how they approach this.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/14580

453

SI149

14580

Podesta discussing how to skirt campaign finance law and the FEC. Option proposed: ‘there is one legal tool we could use that might slow them down. The law has a little noticed or used provision that says that if a complaint has been filed and it is either dismissed or not acted upon within 120 days the entity that filed the complaint can sue the FEC to force it to proceed with enforcement. If the FEC fails to move forward, then the complainant is permitted to bring their own lawsuit to enforce the law directly. IF it were announced that this was the path we intended to take, it would both make news and perhaps give pause to the groups.” FURTHER PROOF OF COORDINATION BETWEEN HRC CAMPAIGN AND DNC: “Is this something we want to push forward? If so, would we want the DNC to do it? The campaign? Or would we prefer it be done externally?”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/14580

454

SI150

15000

EMAILID 15000 Glenn Ivey and Cheryl Mills discuss their dreams of abolishing the Benghazi Committee, which uncovered much of the information that lead to the Clinton email scandal.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/15000

455

SI151

15000

There’s a lot of work on this on both sides of the Capitol” TO ABOLISH THE BENGHAZI COMMITTEE

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/15000

456

SI152

15000

EMAILID 15000 Glenn Ivey and Cheryl Mills discuss their dreams of abolishing the Benghazi Committee, which uncovered much of the information that lead to the Clinton email scandal.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/15000

457

SI153

15014

And here’s more evidence of the “non-existence” of the Clinton campaign prior to her announcement. Notice the “we haven’t been ‘hired'” instead of truthfully “we haven’t been hired.” (no quotes) “The other thing we’d need to be very careful about from a compliance perspective is that we are volunteering to help her make a final decision. We haven’t been “hired” and she hasn’t decided to run. It’s very important we make that clear.”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/15014

458

SI154

15202

EMAILID 15202 Robby Mook the campaign manager Mentioning the Priorities super PAC (just busted for illegal coordination by the latest O’Keefe video)

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/15202

459

SI155

15202

EMAILID 15202 Robby Mook the campaign manager Mentioning the Priorities super PAC (just busted for illegal coordination by the latest O’Keefe video)

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/15202

460

SI156

15202

EMAILID 15202 Robby Mook the campaign manager Mentioning the Priorities super PAC (just busted for illegal coordination by the latest O’Keefe video)

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/15202

461

SI157

15387

…The other is that the press as a whole doesn’t like Clinton very much (and the feeling is mutual), so there’s a bias toward believing that the public feels the same way. So somehow her campaign is struggling even when it’s winning, and polls that show her winning are reported as showing her losing

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/15387

462

SI158

15387

Quinnipac poll showing HRC winning. Ample evidence is now available that polling orgs are shilling for HRC and are outright oversampling groups to get favorable results (See: https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/15442). …The other is that the press as a whole doesn’t like Clinton very much (and the feeling is mutual)…

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/15387

463

SI159

15455

Dinner @ Soros home
Look at the attachments… New America… controlling narrative

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/15455

464

SI160

15464

John Podesta’s real opinion on Senator Bernard Sanders: ” that doofus Bernie” This email also contains some thoughts of Democrat Edwards Tanden about Republicans. He seems like a truly sick individual, completely consumed by hatred in his heart. Tanden about all Rebuplicans: ” If they don’t cooperate then it is no longer hyperbole to say that they are truly enemies of the state, enemies of the world.” Edwards also states: “I’m totally one hundred percent for Hillary because if any one of these bozos makes it to the White House, then we’ll have a revolution on our hands.” NOTE: Note that Edwards Tanden definitely includes Bernie in the “bozos”, because he is directly replying here to a question about Bernie. Neera Tanden wasn’t actually bothered by any of the above because she proudly forwarded the hate speech about Republicans and the insult to Bernie to John Podesta.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/15464#efmAWQAW-

465

SI161

15465

Asking someone to intervene when Ben Jealous wants to endorse Bernie

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/15465

466

SI162

15518

Have her keep her cool. These incompetent bastards are baiting her , embarressing and disrepectful.”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/15518

467

SI163

15531

Hillary herself acknowledges they shouldn’t “be seen” meddling in Convention CEO hire even tho Debbie hired one without consulting them.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/15531

468

SI164

15531

Flipping out over DWS not consulting them for her Convention CEO appointment. And then saying how she needs to understand how to play ball with them

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/15531

469

SI165

15536

Hillary has nothing good to say about LGBT- So they have to script everything she says to them

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/15536

470

SI166

15577

This eerily sounds similar to what Trump just proposed just yesterday. Too bad she’s done the full opposite on these ‘rules’.

Subject: Corruption agenda A government not for the rich and powerful but accountable to you is the best frame from our research.

1 no one from Wall Street will serve in her admin

End the legalized bribery today. If you take a campaign contribution and change a law because of that, go to jail. She has never done that. No one else should either.

End practice of revolving door of members or anyone in admin. 5 yr bans maybe. I don’t know what it is now. If you regulate an industry, can’t go in to it later if you work for her. All will sign a pledge.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/15577

471

SI167

15585

Podesta being asked to meet with Soros.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/15585

472

SI168

15922

Podesta being asked to meet with Soros.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/15922

473

SI169

16031

Diversity is a tactic, not a value
Can you call Larry and see what minorities he would put in top tier? Could be an asian. I know this isn’t Larry’s taste, but better if a woman

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/16031

474

SI170

16070

More from Hillary herself: in a discussion of the Obamacare Cadillac Tax she says “we have to be careful the R version passes which begins the unraveling of he ACA”.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/16070

475

SI171

16088

Apparently Hillary said something on Rachel (Maddow?) about a pressing amendment to DOMA that (according to team) was incorrect, ie not factual. The team know she won’t go back on it, say she’s wrong. Hillary’s incorrect statement has upset LGBT supporters, the team is getting blowback. They’re trying to work out how to spin it. Since THEY know she won’t go back on THIS and they say she’s WRONG:- It’d be a good thing for Trump to ask her in the debate!?

Someone who knows some history around DOMA needs to look at this. Also – sounds like LGBT peeps should know that Hillary HASN’T walked back her wrong statement, and won’t, just her team spinning it.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/16088

476

SI172

16237

From:bdwanger@gmail.com To: john.podesta@gmail.com Date: 2015-08-10 21:00 Subject: Wanger/unsolicited comment

Hi, John,

Unsolicited advice from a pr person.

Hillary needs to learn to memorize the first 60 to 90 seconds of prepared remarks.

Just saw her on the news talking about Trump and his remarks denigrating women.

She had great things to say but was reading from a script which made her looked programmed.

If there’s any topic she can talk about passionately without a script this was it. A missed opp.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/16237

477

SI173

16357

I would like to loop Dan and Jake into drafting of likely policy initiatives for testing–they have already provided me some input, but I’d like to get them on calls with the team to drill down on this in more detail, since it’s so important. I know that policy is still a nascent process and will be highly iterative, but I don’t think it makes sense to do the polling in isolation from the policy work itself (since the research should be supporting and informing the policy development)

Clinton team trying to determine what Hillary’s policy positions should be based on polling.

My one thought from the conversation I participated in with Wendy is that her strength is in branding and marketing, using the evidence base in determining how to generate the behaviors sought in the target audience. So I think she has the capacity and creativity to drive the brand development and strategy from inception to execution. I imagine she would rely on the data that is being collected through the polling and focus groups you outline but equally as important, would likely have questions she might suggest specifically be included in the process.

It’s like they’re developing an advertisement campaign for a product, only the product is Hillary Clinton.

I would still assume our budget will be in the $2+ million range per my earlier memo

They spent $2 Million on polling and focus groups to craft Hillary’s public persona

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/16357

478

SI174

16477

Is Podesta the one forming US policies?

> Dear Mr Poddsta,
> Many congratulations on the U.S.-China climate accord. I realise it must have been very hard given the political climate but you got it thru.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/16477

479

SI175

16668

EMAILID 16668 Mae Podesta writing to John Podesta and advising him how to best recommend a person to the CFR the Council of Foreign Relations for a position. The person who needs to have this opportunity according to Mae Podesta is Mea Podesta. Mae writes : I am writing to second the nomination of Mae Podesta to join the Council on Foreign Relations as a Term Member. I’ve known Mae since she was a child, having the pleasure to both watch her grow up and navigate her career, as well as seeing her work first hand when she spent a summer at Walmart with my Sustainability team…. The Council will be lucky to have her as a term member.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/16668#efmALXASR

480

SI176

17133

Podesta being asked to meet with Soros

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/17133

481

SI177

17133

Podesta being asked to meet with Soros.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/17133

482

SI178

17234

When talking about asking for donations. but your more-than 20 pleas for even more additional >> contributions in the space of less than 72 hours is absurd, annoying, and >> unworthy of you. Please moderate it.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/17234

483

SI179

17313

while we have record poverty rates and HRC campaign fraudulently over charges small donors they “This year, our party will be taco themed-with fresh, handmade tortillas flown in from Mexico the previous day”. http://observer.com/2016/09/exclusive-hillary-clinton-campaign-systematically-overcharging-poorest-donors/

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/17313

484

SI180

17338

Final q & a script of HRC for email investigation. States ” CORE LANGUAGE FOR ALL ANSWERS” which implies STICK TO THIS SCRIPT! We now know this whole statement is a fabricated lie and the emails were not turned over and were in fact deleted by her campaign and HRC herself! Additionally, HRC states she gave orders to have her “personal” emails deleted: “I didn’t see a reason to keep them so I asked that they be deleted”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/17338

485

SI181

17343

> [SECOND IDEA] Strengthen bribery laws to ensure that politicians don’ change legislation for political donations.
>The second idea is a favorite of mine, as you know, but REALLY dicey territory for HRC, right?

Tldr
They acknowledge how corrupt she is!

https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/17343#searchresult

486

SI182

17343

EMAILID 17343

Re: memo on govt reform/pulbic corruption Mar 1, 2016 at 4:49 PM, Jake Sullivan wrote about several ideas and their public support:

Increase government’s public reporting so voters know what goverment is doing …66..

Strengthen bribery laws to ensure that politicians don’ change legislation for political donations. 62%

The second idea is a favorite of mine, as you know, but REALLY dicey territory for HRC, right?

Wouldn’t want those bribery laws strengthened now, would we?

Neera Tanden’s response:

This is a jump ball. She may be so tainted she’s really vulnerable = if so, maybe a message of I’ve seen how this sausage is made,

Crooked Hillary Clinton is “really vulnerable” on corruption, folks. According to her own staff who know her really well.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/17343#efmAFHAHJARzATdAeFAfj

487

SI183

17343

Jake Sullivan no less, suggests that HRC takes bribes for crafting laws.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/17343#efmARzATdAeFAfj

488

SI184

17357

EMAILID 17375 Brent Budowsky and Podesta emailing each other, again. (they had almost 100 emails to each other in the 19 000 that came out so far). Budowsky writes:

And at a major university in Washington, D.C., where many of the kids come here because of an interest in politics and are already working as interns, there was not one student who gave enough of a damn for Hillary to open a booth, or even wear a Hillary button—-I didn’t see one and I was looking.

This pretty much explains why CTR’s paid posting campaigns were needed for Reddit and Facebook. She does not have enough real supporters who “give enough of a damn” to actively cheer and support her. This is why they need masses of paid shills here on Reddit, to create the illusion of enthusiastic support.

If there are secret Clinton talking points to surrogates to attack Bernie—and I now believe the story is true—–she is going to create ill-will that neither she nor her staff can even imagine. ..

What will happen if this continues is Bernie will get pissed off and lash back and I can write the words he will say if Clinton tactics anger him—-FBI investigation and aides taking the Fifth will be among them—and it will not be pretty.

Podesta responds :

We already discussed Castro. Beyond that, why do you think that story is not just a bunch of hyped up BS intended to have exactly the kind of reaction you are exhibiting?

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/17375#efmAAGACw

489

SI185

17368

If you donate to Democrats they will get you experimental life saving drugs.

Please please call them. I need tthem to ask people on the board why fred can’t have this drug. This drug has been tested with freds tumor in a testube and is efficaous. The drug is in the hospital that fred is in AND this drug is being used in clinical trials on myloma (but fred doesn’t qualify). It’s bullshit. If I am unable to get drug I will take out full pg add in boston globe to ceo and board members. Fred is running out of time. He’s so sick and needs this drug. Thanks so much

.

I’ve worked the dutko, foley hoag and partners angles. Don’t know that it will mean anything given the pressure he’s already resisted, but hope it helps

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/17368

490

SI186

17375

LITERALLY NO VOTER SUPPORT
>And at a major university in Washington, D.C…. there was not one student who gave enough of a damn for Hillary to open a booth, or even wear a Hillary button—-I didn’t see one and I was looking.

SECRET ATTACK SCRIPT ON BERNIE
>If there are secret Clinton talking points to surrogates to attack Bernie—and I now believe the story is true—–she is going to create ill-will that neither she nor her staff can even imagine.
Like is currently happening?

BERNIE WILL FALL IN LINE
>Moreover, Bernie is a pro, and his inclination will be to play ball if Hillary is nominated and urge his supporters to come around.

HOW TO HANDLE BERNIE
>The way to handle Bernie is to do what I have done in my columns—give high praise to Hillary, emphasize the historic moment for women and her vast qualifications, counter-attack against the Republican inquisitions, make love to Bernie and his idealistic supporters, and co-opt as many of his > progressive issues as possible, such as increasing social security benefits and paying for it through a transaction tax on Wall Street.
She has no policies of her own!

NOONE LIKES HRC ENOUGH TO WORK FOR FREE
>Read the Sunday NY Times story about all the tech wizards doing for Bernie for free what Hillary has to pay for

PROOF HRC LIES ABOUT WHY SHE WANTS TO BECOME PRESIDENT
>what the Hillary campaign should be doing… not negative politics that can’t be put in writing and have to be hidden like grand jury testimony because her well-paid consultants do not want anyone to know why they think she should become president…..

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/17375

491

SI187

17451

Here’s Hillary’s Brain Trust preparing ONE tweet “from” Hillary on something the Pope said about Climate Change. She really doesn’t have one original thought, all her tweets, interviews, speeches, debate answers are prepared by Podesta and the other minions.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/17451

492

SI188

17556

HRC campaign are very worried a WSJ reporter knows she is working with John on a campaign in 2014 while collecting fees and CF $$$. They lied to him.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/17556

493

SI189

17700

They have to decide whether her explanation on why she stayed married to Bill was sufficient. Apparently Hillary is such a blank slate that they even have to choose what words she says about her marriage?

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/17700

494

SI190

17724

EMAILID 17724 Dan Schwerin

Here is a draft statement opposing TPP. It’s long, but covers a lot of ground. The goal here was to minimize our vulnerability to the authenticity attack and not piss off the WH any more than necessary.

Staff creates a statement about Hillary opposing TPP. Which is interesting because while staff creates this statement they admit she pushed and advocated for TPP.

Joel Benenson writes:

But the reality is HRC is more pro trade than anti and trying to turn her into something she is not could reinforce our negative around authenticity. This is an agreement that she pushed for and largely advocated for.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/17724#efmAAGAD6

495

SI191

17747

Debbie Dignell (D) Want’s nothing to do w/ Hillary

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/17747

496

SI192

17922

She was also championing TPP according to Jake Sullivan:

She has concerns about where TPP will end up. But denying potus negotiating authority to finish a deal she has championed?

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/17992

497

SI193

17955

HRC Meeting With Elizabeth Warren

Huma Abedin wrote:

HRC Health Issues back in Nov 2014
>Like all of you, the questions we get asked 20 times a day is a. where is she and what is she doing?

>Our answer is as honest as possible. We are giving her the time and space to think through the things she needs to think through.

Honest as possible implies hiding something…

>On John and CDM, we say you have been her closest advisors for a hundred years and that hasnt changed. Since we have never discussed this as a group or agreed on what to say, sharing with everyone.

Coordinating stories in case anyone asks

>We should be thoughtful about any group that wants to rent Friend of Hillary list now because there is interest. This is also probably best discussed off email.
Proof there is Collusion among her biggest donors

From: Robert Mook
>And then there’s the press question–not sure how high the chance of a leak is, but it would be good to have a joint plan with Mindy in the event it gets out to shape coverage. Or to proactively leak if that’s what EW wants. Not a bad thing to put out there that they had a constructive mtg.

Info “leaked” to the media without the media corroborating. More proof of MSM working for HRC

From:robbymook@gmail.com
>Will definitely get leaked!

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/17955

498

SI194

18329

opposition research director Tony Carrk sends a hurried email to Podesta and many other high ranking staffers:

subject: If we get to talk to her on break

Have her mention climate change J

Now just what this could be? Seems very important to mention climate change, IF the staff can talk to her on break. If they update her talking points during the break they have to include climate change in there, writes Carrk. Now what situation could allow for such a break? Perhaps a debate against Bernie Sanders? Can someone look into whether there were any debates against Bernie during this time. This email strongly implies that they used the breaks in some type of event to update her talking points with the latest information produced by the team. This email was sent on 2016-01-18 0:47 (just barely, seems more like the evening of 01-17 in a different timezone)

UPDATE from a poster in the thread:” “View source” shows that email was received by Podesta’s ISP on Sun, 17 Jan 2016 18:47:14 (PST) which is actually during the Democrat debate on January 17 in which Crooked Hillary competed against Senator Bernie Sanders and other Dems.”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/18329

499

SI195

18346

Trying to dig up dirt on Gowdy

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/18346

500

SI196

18353

HRC MENTAL HEALTH “It worries me more that she doesn’t seem to know what planet we are all living
in at the moment.”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/18353#efmACXAD2AFIAGYAGaAGl

501

SI197

18353

EMAILID 18353

2015-09-15 Neera Tanden and John Podesta tackle the issue of Hillary in the primary. Is she a progressive or a moderate?

Neera writes:

Why did she call herself a moderate?

Podesta replies:

I pushed her on this on Sunday night. She claims she didn’t remember saying it. Not sure I believe her. We were speculating, that it may be a Don Baer intervention.

John Podesta, the chairman of the Hillary Clinton campaign, thinks that Hillary may be lying to him here. To even think this Podesta MUST believe that Hillary is a pathological liar who just can’t stop lying. Podesta simply does not believe or trust her. You know your “trustworthy” numbers must be bad when you read “Not sure I believe her” from your own goddamn campaign chairman.

Neera Tanden angrily responds

I mean it makes my life more difficult after telling every reporter I know she’s actually progressive but that is really the smallest of issues. It worries me more that she doesn’t seem to know what planet we are all living in at the moment.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/18353#efmAFIAGxAJCAJm

502

SI198

18918

HRC PHYSICAL HEALTH. “Well I definitely was able to breathe again when it was over.” why? afraid of her passing out on stage?

https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/18918#searchresult

503

SI199

20000

HRC HEALTH ISSUES! John Podesta writes on 2016-01-17. Great answer to Trump, but hard to cram more into her head in terms of quotes to memorize tonight. Still we should come back to it.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/20000#efmAAGACJ

504

SI200

20949

Some unflattering points,that we better be aware of,just in case Trump(or whoever) gets a hold of this and uses it in states like Florida where it would be very damaging. In any event need to be ready to answer the below if it pops up in adds or during debates. Not good! Attachment: article about HRC true position and feelings on Israel. She is highly critical of them

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/20949

505

SI201

21074

Brent Budowsky :

It is 9:13. Hillary just attacked Bernie. I just turned the debate off. I cannot watch any more. She is a slow learner.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/21074#efmAAGACB

506

SI202

21213

From: Sara Solow
>She wants to be able to say: “No, I don’t accept donations from private prisons or from ppl who run private prisons.” But for her to say that, it has to be true.

TRANSLATION, HRC TAKES MONEY FROM PRIVATE PRISONS THAT LOCK UP MORE BLACKS/ HISPANICS THAN WHITES. -> THEY MAKE MORE MONEY THE MORE PEOPLE ARE IMPRISONED.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michaela-pommells/study-more-people-of-colo_b_4826086.html
>More than 60 percent of prison inmates in the U.S. identify as African American or Latino despite making up only 30 percent of the population.
>private prisons seek the least expensive prisoner to generate the highest possible profit.
>Private prisons receive carte blanche, picking and choosing the most desirable prisoner. In this case, they are more likely to chose African American and Latino prisoners; the prisoners of plenty.

HRC needs to be able to say “that she only accepts money from bundlers who lobby for private prisons — as well as other groups. Or that there is some disconnect between the lobbyists/bundlers for her, and actual private prison companies.”

Instead of shutting the prisons down or changing the industry, she just removes the direct link.

TLDR, HRC makes more money the more people suffer…

https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/21213#searchresult

507

SI203

21704

Looks like Palmieri was worried about how it looks submitting the same statement twice.

Know I missed discussions today – but this seems dangerous.If I understand this correctly – we are literally submitting her testimony from two years ago?

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/21704#efmAAGAAaAGSAHNAHyAIxASyAVX

508

SI204

21779

Their staff confirms Obama knew about Hillary’s email server. Confirmation Obama and Hillary emailed. Email is them planning to cover it up:

Suggest Philippe talk to Josh or Eric. They know POTUS and HRC emailed. Josh has been asked about that. Standard practice is not to confirm anything about his email, so his answer to press was that he would not comment/confirm. I recollect that Josh was also asked if POTUS ever noticed her personal email account and he said something like POTUS likely had better things to do than focus on his Cabinet’s email addresses.

https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/21779

509

SI205

21779

More on Obama’s email use. Staff is getting concerned about a NYT story, http://archive.is/noszL titled “Obama Says He Didn’t Know Hillary Clinton Was Using Private Email Address”:

Phillipe Reines:

One of us should connect with the WH just so they know that the email will show his statement to not make sense.

Jennifer Palmieri :

Suggest Philippe talk to Josh or Eric. They know POTUS and HRC emailed.

Both Palmieri and Reines are fully aware that not only Obama but lower level staff in the White House knew about the private server and the emails exchanged through it.

Phillipe Reines

Ok. Sounds like people are putting words into his mouth.

This is from March 2015, when Hillary has no official title or position. Yet her underlings are talking about how they will contact the White House to get them to change their story.

https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/21779#efmAAGAA-ADkAEEALeAM4AM5APx

510

SI206

21802

TANDEN SUSPECTS DOUG BAND IS A LEAK BUT IT’S ACTUALLY Eric Braverman.

Morning Joe Twitter: A source close to the Clintons tell @ron_fournier to “follow the money” and find the real HRC scandal.

Neera Tanden: I’m hoping someone is keeping tabs on Doug Band. Quote in here is from someone who worked in Clinton Foundation.

john.podesta@gmail.com wrote:
Eric Braverman

SEPARATE EMAIL TIES THIS TOGETHER
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/21802

From: Ken Vogel, Politico
“Hey guys: Sorry for the delay on these. The story is about the management challenges and leadership changes at the foundation – and what if anything they portend for 2016. Deadline is Wednesday afternoon.”

“11 – What changed between December 2014 – when the board renewed Eric Braverman’s board term for another three years, and gave him a raise and a bonus – and early January when he resigned?
12 – Was Eric Braverman asked to resign and, if so, why?”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/25357

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/21802

511

SI207

21814

Not Actually respective to any religion

Teddy Goff” wrote: > >> Adding Podesta here too for his review. I vote #2, but defer to the >> non-Jews on this thread if anyone thinks “amen” might rub people the wrong >> way.

There’s only one thing to say about @Pontifex >>> ‘s bold statements on climate change & >>> renewable energy: Amen. -H

https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/21814#searchresult

512

SI208

21848

Prepared Q&A in 2015 , they were already concerned about her health but there is a lot more:

Personal

When will you release your medical records?

• I’m in great health, and I am going to do as other candidates have traditionally done when it came to health records. The voters will know from my doctors how healthy I am!

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/21848

513

SI209

21915

Talk about skirting campaign finance laws

>One clarification question: In your second option in the document, is the idea that RFH would transfer the list to another super pac, which would in turn to sell it to the campaign?

>You probably saw the press stories last weekend about the fact that there is already a complaint filed nearly a year ago about RFH’s rental of the Friends of Hillary list. It won’t be the last. [See https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/17955%5D

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/21915#efmAqfAthAxpA0f

514

SI210

22039

HILLARY CANT SHOW EMOTIONS OR COMMUNICATE PROPER FEELINGS / REMORSE, THEY ADMIT THIS IS NOW A BIGGER ISSUE THAN HER DISHONESTY:

Neera Tanden wrote:

I know this email thing isn’t on the level. I’m fully aware of that. But her inability to just do a national interview and communicate genuine feelings of remorse and regret is now, I fear, becoming a character problem (more so than honesty).

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/22039

515

SI211

22078

Brent hoping they can get Gowdy off the committee
I would not suggest HRC or the campaign raise this directly unless the strategy is total war, but I would suggest that some of her better surrogates might call on Trey Gowdy to resign from the Ethics C’tee….

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/22078

516

SI212

22097

George Soros’ Open Societies Foundation crafting Police Reform policy

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/22097

517

SI213

22105

HRC campaign collusion with State Department

From:jennifer.m.palmieri@gmail.com
To: jbenenson@bsgco.com, Jim.Margolis@gmmb.com, gruncom@aol.com, teddy@precisionstrategies.com
Date: 2015-03-04 22:25
Subject: Emails development

Team – wanted to let you know that Cheryl is working with State to get agreement on release of the 55k pages of emails she have to State. The hope would be that we are able to say tonight to the press that we are working with State to get emails released soon. Not sure where those discussions will land, but hope is either State agrees to release on timely basis or we pledge to release them ourselves in ten days/week. Assume you all would agree this is right move?

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/22105

518

SI214

22197

Podesta speed dating email…. he’s married

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/22197

519

SI215

22202

Podesta having dinner with George Soros

https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/22202

520

SI216

22242

From:ntanden@gmail.com To: john.podesta@gmail.com
Subject: speaking at the banks

dont shoot me but if we lose badly maybe she should just return the money Say she gets the anger and moves on. Feels a little like an open wound One of the canvassers told me it came up at 3 undecideds houses. http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-20/clinton-aide-asks-if-hillary-should-return-money-banks-if-she-loses-badly

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/22242

521

SI217

22247

Tip? That doesn’t seem right.

Someone here just got a tip that the State Department may be planning to release her Benghazi emails tomorrow or Monday. Not sure the source is reliable. Has anyone heard anything about this?

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/22247

522

SI218

22275

Another juicy Chelsea/Doug Band email. This one accuses Doug of calling Bill on the day Hillary’s mother died and “yelled and screamed at my dad about how could he do this to [Doug] and Justin.”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/22275

523

SI219

22392

Still trying to decide what position she should take on TPP/Glass Steagall

“She has to be for TPP*. She called it the “gold standard” of trade agreements. I think opposing that would be a huge flip flop.”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/22392

524

SI220

22392

Ron Klain writes about how Hillary called TPP the “gold standard”. This is what she lied about in the first debate. The staffers knew in 2015 October this would look so bad, but they went along with it anyway.

I had to get off that call before it ended, and I also didn’t want to intrude in that group. But FWIW, my view would be: 1. * She has to be for TPP*. She called it the “gold standard” of trade agreements. I think opposing that would be a huge flip flop. She can say that as President she would work to change it. She can say that it can be better. But I think she should support it.

Jake Sullivan

I agree with you on TPP but others (including on this email!) feel strongly to the contrary.

So two senior officials in the Hillary campaign admitted that it would be a “huge flip flop” and they did it anyway because it was popular at the time. Now Hillary’s only attempted defense is to claim that she did not call TPP the gold standard (she did). Weak.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/22392#efmAHjANp

525

SI221

22485

Possible another bimbo being dicked by Johnny boy? Their other correspondence seems more personal than professional. She’s concerned about whether her son is going to get to the shelter in 90 seconds before the bombs drop on Tel Aviv. Too bad he doesn’t have 4 minutes

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/22485

526

SI222

22898

Here they are trying to weazel out of TPP support, it’s not even her changing position, it’s her staff trying to find a good excuse to get votes:

“you have no easy task here but I do feel like there are too many competing interests in the statement. On one hand you praise Obama while opposing his efforts and actions. Then you dissect the agreement in praise and criticism. And you take a swipe at Republicans for creating the environment that drives part of her opposition which feels forced and a way to lesson the blow to opposing the president. And the arguments against are so policy driven that I feel the American worker gets left out as the real reason to oppose it. But them again, beggars can’t be choosers. If this is what it takes to get an opposition position so be it. But I feel this type of approach, while sensitive to the Obama Administration, may get its own share of criticism for trying to balance her opposition and having it both ways. I would favor more of the paradigm of how we approached the Keystone opposition. More black and white”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/22898

527

SI223

23199

Senator Diane Feinstein admits to “offer to help” and “be a surrogate” for Clinton in Benghazi hearings. Feinstein is the chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee

VERY CLEAR INDICATION OF THIS BEING RIGGED AND THIS

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-09-06/we-wired-it-new-emails-show-hillary-tried-rig-benghazi-hearings-january-2013. https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/58j7jn/gentlement_i_believe_we_found_it_diane_feinstein/

https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/23199

528

SI224

23199

Senator Diane Feinstein admits to “offer to help” and “be a surrogate” for Clinton in Benghazi hearings. Feinstein is the chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee

VERY CLEAR INDICATION OF THIS BEING RIGGED AND THIS

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-09-06/we-wired-it-new-emails-show-hillary-tried-rig-benghazi-hearings-january-2013

https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/58j7jn/gentlement_i_believe_we_found_it_diane_feinstein/

https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/23199

529

SI225

23240

From:faiz.shakir@gmail.com To: john.podesta@gmail.com Date: 2015-11-19 19:38 Subject: Re: What did you think of the speech?

yeah, my favorite part is how he connects IS [ISIS] to “billionaire families” in the Arab world. Always goes back to the billionaires. Hilarious. It sounds a bit too much like “our war in syria and iraq is ultimately a battle to reshape islam”. We’d lose that one. But I like the direction he’s going. Maybe you could one-up him with: “ISIS is trying to behead Islam” (kidding, don’t do that)

Faiz Shakir” wrote:
“Really appreciated the Saudi hit on feeding radical ideology.”
Saudi Arabia won’t be too happy since they ate huge donors

“We tend to be overly >> focused on the violent strains of the radicalism. But even if there weren’t violence, the fact that too many who are for subjugation of women, against gays, against Jews and Christians, etc – is a serious problem for our future.

THEY ADMIT ISLAM HAS HORRIFIC IDEALS YET THEY DO NOTHING BUT PROMOTE IT AMD WANT TO BRING IT INTO OUR COUNTRY!

https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/23240

530

SI226

23327

HRC KNOWS HER SERVER WAS HACKED!

John Podesta <john.podesta@gmail.com<mailto:john.podesta@gmail.com wrote:
Reluctant to go there. Makes it seem like she consciously went to the home server for security reasons which would fall apart under scrutiny.

Roy Spence <Roy.Spence@gsdm.com> wrote:
IRS was hacked. I think the State Department was hacked. Sony hacked. Banks hacked. As we try and close the Benghazi Chapter and the email drip drip. Is there ever a moment in TiMe not to Defend the decision but layout the fact….HRC servers were not hacked. Know this is s naive thought but just thinking.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/23327#efmACtAE7AIzALQ

531

SI227

23327

subject:Re: Hey bro quick question.

The topic is the security of the private sever. Maybe they should claim it was really secure and maybe even better protected then some governmental systems. Podesta shoots the idea down:

Reluctant to go there. Makes it seem like she consciously went to the home server for security reasons which would fall apart under scrutiny.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/23327#efmACtAE6

532

SI228

23344

From: John Podesta
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 7:43:07 AM
To: H
Subject: Re: Thanks for helping steer the ship thru our first choppy waters.
“I think you have a funky server.”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/23344

533

SI229

23363

Seems they were knowingly already prepping for a campaign in JAN 14? FEC violation given she had paid speeches after?

” … it will get reported if someone talks as a political meeting rather than one designed to preserve her options”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/23363#efmAMtAOaAZJAcG

534

SI230

23539

“We recommend not engaging on specific questions related to 1) donors; 2) implementation of the MOU; or 3) HRC’s knowledge of donors to the foundation. These are rabbit holes.” The Clinton Foundation Memorandum of Understanding. When Clinton becamse Sec of State Obama made her sign the attached document. She agreed that there wouldn’t even be the appearance of a conflict of interest between her job at State and the donor’s to the foundation.

https://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Clinton-Inc-December-3-2013-production-pg-2-6.pdf

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/23539

535

SI231

23845

EMAILD The Bonner Group has a question for Podesta

Subject: Is there someone in your shop

Who totally understands “executive orders”. It is to answer a very big donors questions

Podesta responds within 2 hours “of course” to put the “very big donors” mind at ease.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/23845

536

SI232

23891

HRC CAMPAIGN ACKNOWLEDGES SHE DELETED HER EMAILS

From:bfallon@hillaryclinton.com
To: hsamuelson@cdmillsgroup.com
Date: 2015-06-25 00:40 Subject:
Re: Proposed response to upcoming State Dept disclosure on Sid emails

*ON-THE-RECORD RESPONSE FROM SPOKESMAN NICK MERRILL:*
“Hillary Clinton has turned over 55,000 pages of materials to the State Department, including all emails in her possession from Mr. Blumenthal.”

*OFF RECORD, if pressed on whether we are essentially admitting the possibility that she deleted some emails:*
Look, we do not know what these materials are, or where they came from. Just take a look at them: many of the documents are not even formatted as emails.

Why would the HRC campaign have a plan for responding to allegations she deleted emails if they know she didn’t delete them?????

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/23891#efmASbAUJ

537

SI233

23891

HRC CAMP USES PLANTED QUESTIONS TO MANIPULATE PUBLIC OPINION
EMAILD Brian Fallon – in the news today as a suspected question planter at a Hillary press conference – lays out a plan. How to effectively hide the fact that Hillary Clinton deleted emails even in the face of upcoming evidence.

https://twitter.com/DRUDGE_REPORT/status/789447550575063040

“OFF RECORD, if pressed on whether we are essentially admitting the possibility that she deleted some emails:Look, we do not know what these materials are, or where they came from. Just take a look at them: many of the documents are not even formatted as emails.”

THE GOAL WAS TO CREATE THE ILLUSION THAT HILLARY CLINTON DID NOT DELETE ANY EMAILS (SHE DID).

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/23891#efmASbAUJ

538

SI234

23957

HRC CAMPAIGN CONCERNED ABOUT LEAK AND EMAILS

From:cheryl.mills@gmail.com
To: john.podesta@gmail.com
Date: 2014-11-14 13:26 Subject:
Re: remind me to discus with you

http://abc11.com/news/secret-emails-of-potential-clinton-campaign-managers-revealed/394929/

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/23957

539

SI235

24057

EMAILD Neera Tanden about the New York Times journalists and editors:

“Fuck these assholes.”

Neera Tanden is the President of the Center for American Progress (CAP), and one of the most prominent email partners of Podesta as shown by the Podesta leaks.

This is what the powerful Clinton people thought about the servile media such as the New York Times as soon as they wrote anything but sycophantic praises of Hillary Clinton. In this case the NYT dared to report about Hillary Clinton’s email abuses. Their reaction: “Fuck these assholes”. And they did. They planned retaliation against the NYT journalists. And by now it is clear they got them to fall in line. They never dare to reveal even slightly negative information about the Clintons.

Jennifer Palmieri’s reacton to “Fuck these assholes”

“Love it. Thanks, Neera!”

Neera Tanden
“this is probably very unhealthy for me, but I’m going to war on this on twitter.”

This is the key folks, this is how we even know they were talking about the New York Times. The date of the email is Thu, 30 Jul 2015 20:56:39 -0700 (PDT) . Neera Tanden posted the following to twitter during this time : tweet 1 http://archive.is/PcBAy document from tweet 1 http://archive.is/XLFS1 tweet 2 http://archive.is/tmfib tweet 3. http://archive.is/ItFbj

This is Neera’s response:
“@ron_fournier @HillaryClinton @nytimes Did you read the letter? Is that kind of journalism you practice Ron? I would never have thought that”

But what did she respond to? This tweet from Ron Fournier http://archive.is/UPl2U

Who convinced @HillaryClinton to pick a fight with @nytimes (and by extension all of us)? PR malpractice.

The evidence is conclusive. The only possible target of the “Fuck these assholes” is the servile New York Times, now working overtime for the Hillary Clinton campaign. This is the retaliation and anger, both internally and publicly when the lapdog media steps out of line. They dared to write about the emails. This was the cause for “war on twitter” for Neera Tanden. Two days later Tanden is still angrily tweeting about the NYT http://archive.is/ejqID http://archive.is/gG8gw . There is no other “letter”, just the one written to the NYT. There is no other “twitter war” in this period, just against the New York Times.

Neera Tanden’s message to the New York Times journalists and editors for all to see : “fuck these assholes” . Will the New York Times report this, examine this story? Will they ask Neera whether she stands by her comments that the NYT are assholes who should be fucked? Or will the New York Times cover up the story even though it directly involves them and their coverage?

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/24057#efmAAGABWAFQAFk

540

SI236

24222

HRC Campaign Position on Trump Exposing HRC/Obama ISIS Connection

“While on one level Trump’s assertion is somewhat silly and superficial, on another its potentially clever because it could possibly lead to a new spate of articles on how ISIS came to be and the US role in it. Frankly, it also may resonate somewhat as well (especially with respect to Obama) because of the widely shared perception, rightly or wrongly, that the Obama Administration was slow to address ISIS and that its resulting strategy is limited in nature and ineffectual (witness terrorist incidents in Europe and the United States).

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/24222

541

SI237

24222

HRC CAMP DOESNT OUTRIGHT SAY THEY DIDNT CREATE ISIS, INSTEAD THEY DISCUSS DEFLECTIONS!

From:Jeff.Bialos@sutherland.com
To: john.podesta@gmail.com, johnpodesta@hillaryclinton.com, lrosenberger@hillaryclinton.com

Subject: A Few Thoughts on Trump’s ISIS Comment – For What They Are Worth

While I’m sure you are all on top of this, I thought to mention a few points for what they are worth. While on one level Trump’s assertion is somewhat silly and superficial, on another its potentially clever because it could possibly lead to a new spate of articles on how ISIS came to be and the US role in it. Frankly, it also may resonate somewhat as well (especially with respect to Obama) because of the widely shared perception, rightly or wrongly, that the Obama Administration was slow to address ISIS and that its resulting strategy is limited in nature and ineffectual (witness terrorist incidents in Europe and the United States).

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/24222

542

SI238

24353

H Clinton to Podesta
Huge email possibly classified, definitely sensitive information Note: Sources include Western intelligence, US intelligence and sources in the region.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/24353

543

SI239

24487

WALL ST BANKS LOVE HRC AND HER POLICIES FOR THEM

WILLIAM DAVID COHAN >> wrote:

“i assume with HRC looking better these days, wall street is pretty happy with that and with Trump, wall street must be in despair”

From:rwolf@32advisors.com To: jpalmieri@hillaryclinton.com, aelrod@hillaryclinton.com

“You can see Bill’s questions to me. I have become friends with him and can get insights but recall in general he is not a fan of most banks especially Goldman so don’t know his angle yet.”

If Bill is truly not a fan of the banks, then why did he sign into law the repeal (the Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act) of Glass Steagall which gave the banks unprecedented ability to gamble with deposits? Bill signing this into law directly resulted in the 2008 Great Financial Crisis
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glass%E2%80%93Steagall_legislation

The only explanation is they own him as a result of #PayToPlay. Wall St. banks have given $30 million to the Clintons through speaking fees and donations to the Clinton Foundation.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/24887

544

SI240

24584

HRC Running for Emperor & Her own Campaign has doubts about her

From:brentbbi@webtv.net
To: john.podesta@gmail.com

“one of HRC’s opponents will soon charge that she is running an “imperial campaign.” If it is the right opponent, Democrat or Republican, the charge will resonate. Probably 90% of the total media coverage of HRC has a negative slant, from her paid speeches to foundation donations to not answering questions from the press.”

“If we look at a long curve of her numbers, there is reason for serious concern if trends continue and I see nothing today that will change them.”

“There is a missing element in her campaign and it is troubling. The “imperial campaign” charge will resonate when the right candidate figures it out….”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/24584

545

SI241

24797

THE WHOLE JOBS RECOVER HAS BEEN A COMPLETE FARCE AND THEY KNOW IT!

From:donna@brazileassociates.com
To: john.podesta@gmail.com

“I think people are more in despair about how things are—yes new jobs but they are low wage jobs. HOUSING is a huge issue. Most people pay half of what they make to rent…”

THEY LIE EVERY TIME THEY ARE IN PUBLIC ABOUT HOW WELL THE ECONOMY IS DOING. THEY KNOW IT SUCKS!

https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/789482865360764928

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-21/head-democratic-party-makes-stunning-admission-people-are-despair-about-how-things-a

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/24797

546

SI242

25228

PODESTA DISCUSSES POSITION TITLE SEMANTICS TO SKIRT COMPENSATION LAW

John Podesta
wrote: “Just member of advisory board if that’s what others are called.”

“Debbie Fine” wrote:
“they are members of the steering committee. i was looking for a title since an office and asst may be considered forms of compensation, but there is nothing that says a steering committee member can’t be compensated for his work as such so we could go with that if you prefer. (a CAP board member cannot be compensated for his work as such per by laws)”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/25228

547

SI243

25255

MORE COLLUSION BETWEEN MEDIA AND HRC CAMPAIGN & HRC CAMPAIGN PLANTING QUESTIONS WITH THE PRESS

John Podesta wrote:

Haim [Saiban, media conglomerate head, including Univision] thinks we are under reacting to Trump/Hispanics. Thinks we can get something by standing up for Latinos or attacking R’s for not condemning

Huma Abedin wrote:
“I told him [Haim Saiban] she [HRC] had said something but he says he’s only heard her talk about immigration. And if Haim is raising it, it means he’s hearing it from his Univision colleagues. I told him I’d send what we had said so Kristina if you have that, would be great. Also told him about la raza but he thought that was too late. Do you think we would get it as a question at the press avail tomorrow? Cause it would be perfect opportunity.
HRC CAMPAIGN PLANTING QUESTIONS WITH THE PRESS

Lorella Praeli wrote:
Alex, who works for Haim, called a few minutes ago. Same message- Haim thinks HRC needs to be on the forefront of this… He asked to call him and share our plan and get input from them.

Robby Mook wrote:
Call to action to the groups, ask CHC members to write op eds, Univision interview, etc. then we need to make more news at La Raza.
HRC CAMPAIGN GIVING ORDERS FOR PEOPLE TO WRITE OP EDS AND THEN THE MEDIA TO PUBLISH THEM!

*Friday, July 10th / Saturday, July 11th * HRC Tweet/Facebook post saying she’s looking forward to speaking at NCLR tomorrow
HRC NOT GENERATING HER OWN POSITIONS AND OUTREACH

From:xhinojosa@hillaryclinton.com
To: arenteria@hillaryclinton.com
Date: 2015-07-04 00:49
Subject: Re: Hi
I’ve included a draft plan on how we can go after Trump’s comments over the next week leading up to NCLR.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/25255

548

SI244

25320

Hillary donors think there is not enough Play for their Pay

big donors usually have ideas/advice and want to feel like they are being heard

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/25320#efmAFmAHCATBAUQ

549

SI245

25320

Steven Bakalar to Podesta about fundraisers and big donors. He says Hillary must tweak her policy to be more in line with the donors (this is in May 2015) Who is Bakalar? “Just to remind, I’m the guy who raised $600K for Obama re-elect”. Bakalar writes :

“Raisers are effectively salespeople selling the candidate on the donor marketplace, so their feedback is valuable to HQ in terms of tweaking policy, messaging, tone, etc …
big donors usually have ideas/advice and want to feel like they are being heard”

They give the money so their ideas must be taken seriously. It seems Bakalar was worried that in 2015 the donors weren’t assured enough that there will be enough play of their ideas. We haven’t seen any later complaints about this so it must have been fixed quite efficiently.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/25320#efmAFmAHCATBAUQ

550

SI246

25341

HRC TURNED OVER SERVER TO THIRD PARTY

Neera Tanden writes email subject: Why doesn’t she just turn the server over to a third party at this point? : isn’t it going to leak out of the FBI anyway?

Podesta replies: Done so think about something else

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/25341

551

SI247

25342

Sitting with Soros to see if he approves of messaging in ads funded by Soros, since he is a “right wing punching bag.”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/25342

552

SI248

25357

TANDEN SUSPECTS DOUG BAND IS A LEAK BUT IT’S ACTUALLY Eric Braverman.

Morning Joe Twitter: A source close to the Clintons tell @ron_fournier to “follow the money” and find the real HRC scandal.

Neera Tanden: I’m hoping someone is keeping tabs on Doug Band. Quote in here is from someone who worked in Clinton Foundation.

john.podesta@gmail.com wrote:
Eric Braverman

SEPARATE EMAIL TIES THIS TOGETHER
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/21802

From: Ken Vogel, Politico
“Hey guys: Sorry for the delay on these. The story is about the management challenges and leadership changes at the foundation – and what if anything they portend for 2016. Deadline is Wednesday afternoon.”

“11 – What changed between December 2014 – when the board renewed Eric Braverman’s board term for another three years, and gave him a raise and a bonus – and early January when he resigned?
12 – Was Eric Braverman asked to resign and, if so, why?”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/25357

553

SI249

25357

Neera writes:
@JoeNBC: A source close to the Clintons tell @ron_fournier to “follow the money” and find the real HRC scandal. http://t.co/lPTQY0L0o4 I’m hoping someone is keeping tabs on Doug Band. Quote in here is from someone who worked in Clinton Foundation.

Doug Band just became a lot more interesting. Doug is one of the founders of TENEO http://archive.is/ykcQo We have to keep tabs on him from now on.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/25357#efmAFAAJC

554

SI250

25445

Information suggesting that Tim Kaine lied and lied and lied. About when he learned about being VP. Eric Mullen says Kaine knew in July 2015 he is going to be the nominee for Vice President:

“Won’t stop assuring Sens Brown and Heitkamp (at dinner now) that HRC has personally told Tim Kaine he’s the veep.”

Kaine said that he knew only 48 hours before the announcement.

article about this wikileak http://www.lifezette.com/polizette/wikileaks-kaine-clinton-lied-vp-selection/

https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/25445#efmALMAM-

555

SI251

25489

MAJOR TENSION BETWEEN PODESTA AND TANDEN

Neera Tanden wrote:
“I’m not the diversity police but there is grumbling on the 4 white boys running next presidential cycle. So I recommend rolling out some people who look like the rest of America soon!”

John Podesta wrote:
“Really, don’t you think I know that?”

Neera Tanden wrote:
“Yeah I know you know it. But in case people feel intimidated in making direct comments to Hillaryland, I thought I’d let you know of grumbling I’m hearing directly. But maybe that was my mistake.”

John Podesta wrote:
“Since you failed to convince Danielle, got other top tier suggestions?”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/25489

556

SI252

25573

Paul Begala to Podesta during the 2008 campaign. Apparently Obama pushed for investigation into “Clinton’s sex life”:

“My hatred for the Clinton-bashing, hand-wringing, sanctimonious commentariat outweighs all other considerations. It’s okay for Barack’s campaign to push reporters to pry into Clinton’s sex life, but if Clinton says Barack is fudging his story about the war, he’s a racist? Give me a break.’

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/25573

557

SI253

25611

I’ve got a great idea! Let’s put all our presidential administration transition data on the Google cloud!

“I’ve set up a data room on google sites to help you all share information with each other. Please take time and upload files that you want to share.”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/25611

558

SI254

25651

HRC STRATEGY TO DISCREDIT & BEAT TRUMP BY CHANGING AND DEFRAUDING VOTER LAWS

Brent Budowsky: “Best approach is to slaughter Donald for his bromance with Putin”

“The best single move to elect her would be a massive voter registration and organization drive. Expand the electorate so more voters will vote so her low trust ratings generally will have less pro rated impact, and the number of higher trust voters will be newly registered…

…It is no coincidence that this year Trump runs no ads, while Jeb and Hillary run the most ads with little effect. Voter registration by contrast creates real voters and changes—and improves—the playing field itself. There is no ad on earth that will increase her trust ratings or the enthusiasm of her voters the way a mega-registration project will increase her support on election day.” – end of quote

Well, we all know what´s included in the phrase “massive voter and organization drive”.

SEE PROJECT VERITAS VIDEOS:

Project Veritas, Rigging the Election – Part I: Clinton Campaign and DNC Incite Violence at Trump Rallies
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5IuJGHuIkzY

Project Veritas, Mass Voter Fraud, Part 2: Bussing in illegal immigrants with fake IDs to vote in numerous states
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hDc8PVCvfKs

Project Veritas, DNC Schemes to Bully Women at Trump Rally
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b24Yq1Ndnjo&feature=youtu.be

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/25651

559

SI255

25657

“SOME KIND OF ILLEGAL ALLEGATIONS BROUGHT AGAINST WJC THAT CHELSEA AND PODESTA NEED TO ADDRESS “”QUICKLY””

“”A former MF Global employee accused former president William J. Clinton of collecting $50,000 per month through his Teneo advisory firm in the months before the brokerage careened towards its Halloween filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy.

Teneo was hired by MF Global’s former CEO Jon S. Corzine to improve his image and to enhance his connections with Clinton’s political family, said the employee, who asked that his name be withheld because he feared retribution.””

aj66@nyu.edu [Chelsea Clinton] wrote:

“”I was in London Sunday and did a Foundation event Sunday evening and two people separately voiced concerns directly to me about Teneo, neither of whom I know well…””

“”Ilya has called Members of the House and Members of Parliament, “”on behalf of President Clinton,”” for Teneo clients (eg for Andrew Liveris and Dow who’s coming this month to London), without my father’s knowledge and inelegantly and ineffectually at best and at worse has now precipitating people in London making comparisons between my father and Tony Blair’s profit motivations. Which would horrify my father. “”

“”Sara also told Bari she started working for Teneo, as Teneo, more than a year ago and then recently stopped because she was so upset, partly because of what Doug and Declan asked her to do/ pretend was happening for their clients at Davos- that’s all I know.””
SOUNDS SKETCHY

From:john.podesta@gmail.com
To: aj66@nyu.edu

“”We need to move to a resolution of this quickly.”””

Articles about this:

Leaked Emails Show Tension Inside Clinton Inner Circle
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/leaked-emails-show-tension-inside-clinton-circle-42708277

Report: Bill Clinton Reaped Big Bucks from Corzine Firm Before Collapse
http://nation.foxnews.com/mf-global/2011/12/05/report-bill-clinton-reaped-big-bucks-corzine-firm-collapse

Claim: Clinton Collected $50K Per Month From MF Global
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2816382/posts

Claim: Clinton Collected $50K Per Month From MF Global
http://humanevents.com/2011/12/05/claim-clinton-collected-50k-per-month-from-mf-global/

Tldr:
Basically, they knew they were going to go bankrupt. So, they decided to pay Bill $50,000 each month to show him some love. That way all the money didn’t go to waste when they filed for Bankruptcy. Also, shows they have less money on hand and more of a reason to file for bankruptcy. Pretty fuckin’ shady.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/25657

560

SI256

25756

CITI GROUP EMPLOYEE EMAILING PODESTA ABOUT TREASURY SECRETARY POSITION. COLLUDING WITH WALL ST TO PICK TREASURER

From:fromanm@citi.com
To: john.podesta@gmail.com
Date: 2008-10-07 11:06
Subject:

“So, just to review from our conversation Sunday, with regard to the private vet, should we assume we start with the following? Tim Geithner Larry Summers Jim Jones Jim Steinberg Jack Reed Janet Napolitano John Kerry Susan Rice Chuck Hagel”

TIM GEITHNER BECAME SEC TREASURE (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timothy_Geithner)

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/25756

561

SI257

25773

PODESTA CALLS OUT THE HRC MARKETING TEAM FOR BEING WORTHLESS

Neera Tanden wrote:
“this video is awesome. Did the campaign do it? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_8KbyIlruso&#8221;

From:john.podesta@gmail.com
To: ntanden@gmail.com
Date: 2016-02-14 04:25
Subject: Re:

“You have to be kidding. When have our people ever ever done anything this interesting?”

REGARDING YOUTUBE VIDEO THAT WAS TAKEN DOWN:
Way Back Machine shows it was “Hillary: Rebel Girl” : https://web.archive.org/web/20160216222153/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_8KbyIlruso
“Pretty sure this is the same one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w0vT2TOMhVI&#8221;

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/25773

562

SI258

25819

Congratulations to Podesta from the Carlyle Group

Carlyle Group owns Booz Allen Hamilton. A big Defense Contractor. But we already knew BAH was sucking up to Clinton. Although Carlyle Group recently started dumping them (made like 2 billion off of them since they went public – IPO). I believe it has to do with their relations to Snowden and the other recent NSA insider threat. The thing with BAH is that they really should be held accountable for their own problems. Security culture in the firm is lax and they have poor management in that respect.

there was a strong connection to W and HW Bush IIRC

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/25819

563

SI259

25988

PODESTA LIKES SHARK FIN SOUP, WHICH SHOULD UPSET PETA

From:progden@gmail.com
To: john.podesta@gmail.com
Date: 2014-11-09 03:40
Subject: Re: touching base

“Great, will do. You off to Beijing again or had enough shark fin soup for a while?”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/25988

564

SI260

26033

Congratulations to Podesta from the Carlyle Group

Carlyle Group owns Booz Allen Hamilton. A big Defense Contractor. But we already knew BAH was sucking up to Clinton. Although Carlyle Group recently started dumping them (made like 2 billion off of them since they went public – IPO). I believe it has to do with their relations to Snowden and the other recent NSA insider threat. The thing with BAH is that they really should be held accountable for their own problems. Security culture in the firm is lax and they have poor management in that respect.

there was a strong connection to W and HW Bush IIRC

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/26033

565

SI261

26098

EMAILID 26098 John Podesta admits to threatening a person called “Tad” over an interview given by Bernie’s brother.

subject was: Re: Tapper just asked Bernie about his brothers interview!

“I think i reported I talked to Tad. Expressed our unhappiness in vaguely threatening terms.”

Tad could be Tad Devine a Bernie adviser. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tad_Devine#Bernie_Sanders.27_presidential_campaign)

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/26098#efmAAGABh

566

SI262

26106

Sermons scripted by the Hillary Clinton campaign: Sep 12, 2015 Dan Schwerin wrote:

“Hi all, wanted to share our draft of tomorrow’s sermon at the Foundry Methodist Church in Washington. HRC is working on this as well. Dan”

Campaign people writing sermons for churches? Is this normal practice? They also want to distribute their campaign sermons as widely as possible. Jim Margolis wants the “script” to get out particularly to African American and Latino ministers:

“Do we have any mechanism to move it to ministers, faith community , particularly AA and Latino ministers?”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/26106#efmAQdASs

567

SI263

26295

Talking about the Benghazi hearings

“I talked to Brian. So long as we do not release the testimony ahead of the hearing – it is okay. If we released it ahead of time, the press would ding is for trolling the Committee and we would lose some of the moral high ground we have going into the hearing.”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/26295

568

SI264

26333

HRC CAMPAIGN HOPING TO DISTRACT FROM BENGHAZI “PROTEST MELTDOWN”

“*From:* John Podesta
*To:* Jennifer Palmieri

*Subject:* Benghazi protest meltdown

He handled it well although a little long windedly lots of unpacking of oversight action and 83 Embassy bombings. Lamented the shouting and partisanship

From:creynolds@hillaryclinton.com
To: john.podesta@gmail.com

Will hopefully be overshadowed by her protest—in which a white guy protested her on super predators and according to the reporters was rejected by the African American crowd.”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/26333

569

SI265

26449

HRC IS RUNNING AGAINST HERSELF BECAUSE SHE IS CORRUPT AND CAN’T DROWN THAT FACT OUT & THE ELITE ARE HATED AND THE BOTTOM ARE IN REVOLT

From:brentbbi@webtv.net
To: john.podesta@gmail.com, roy.spence@gsdm.com
Date: 2015-09-07 13:12
Subject: Washington Post story

Hillary is not running against Bernie, she is running against herself, against the perception that she is calculating and lacks principles and causes and a higher purpose to be president and that she is too beholden to inside powers that give her money and an insider system that voters detest in this election, in both parties…..

Attacking Bernie doesn’t help her win this campaign against herself, it hurts her, stories about others doing “her dirty work” only dirty her and lower her level of trust, and the attacks against Bernie only help him, making him look like the fighter against a corrupt politics of which Hillary appears to part of…..

Bernie is fighting an asymmetrical political war from the bottom up, Hillary is fighting an old fashioned conventional war from the top down in a political year when the top is terribly disliked and the bottom is in revolt….

Hillary is almost universally seen as far too entrenched with Wall Street players who paid her money to speak and give money to her campaigns…

Hillary won’t win one vote by attacking “robber barons” unless she backs it up with substance which doesn’t mean talking class warfare, but does mean taking some policy positions that do not require approval from Wall Street donors….

I was at a university day with thousands of students on Saturday where Bernie had a booth with a long line of people signing up to support him, and Hillary did not have any booth and I did not see even one Hillary button or t-shirt from even one student who cared to support the candidate who would be the first woman president—-not even one!!!

And on Bernie’s major issues, whether they are “left” or not, most of them are majority positions, and she would defeat Bernie by co-opting as many of these issues as possible and not using “surrogates” to do “dirty work” against him which helps him, and hurts her……Brent”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/26449#efmAF6AMV

570

SI266

26545

PODESTA TALKING ABOUT BURYING A STORY PRESUMABLY IN NYT RELATED TO TENEO AND HRC EMAILS BEING INVESTIGATED/CONFIRMED CLASSIFIED

John Podesta wrote:
“Ok let’s save the ammunition for the day they confirm the story and put it on A 37 in the back of the local nyc section given that it involves a local resident.”

From:bfallon@hillaryclinton.com
To: jpalmieri@hillaryclinton.com
Date: 2015-11-07 16:43
Subject: Re: We haven’t had a good war with NYT in awhile

“Sorry. I am misremembering. One of our team heard that rumor from the state department. Think it was heather.

Heather talked to I believe Alex gerlach at State, who said they were hearing only one email had so far been ruled out as Top Secret.

Separately, two reporters who were trying to confirm Gerstein’s report with ODNI reported back to us that they were hearing the same.

The rumor was not that ODNI had completed the review and determined only one was not TS and the other was, but rather that they had only reached a definitive conclusion on the one (we think the North Korea email that supposedly relied on satellite imagery) and were still deciding on the other.

Separately, gerstein is still confident the review is indeed done, and the emails are no longer being handled as TS materials, and the statement was only issued last night because ODNI is trying to avoid embarrassing the IG by acting like they have overruled them.”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/26545

571

SI267

26551

FURTHER PROOF HRC CAMPAIGN IS PRODUCING BIASED POLLS AND THE MEDIA ARE PROMOTING THEM

SEE ATTACHED FOR THEIR PLAN AND BREAKDOWN

Subject: Meet and polling design

“Hey, when can we meet? I also want to get your Atlas folks to
recommend oversamples for our polling before we start in February. By
market, regions, etc. I want to get this all compiled into one set of
recommendations so we can maximize what we get out of our media
polling.”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/26551#efmANYARq

572

SI268

26769

HRC CAMPAIGN STAFF WRITING THE TALKING POINTS FOR HRC ON HER INITIAL SUPPORT FOR DOMA AND ANTI- GAY MARRIAGE AND HOW TO CHANGE PERCEPTION ON THAT

Richard Socarides wrote: “Attached expanded TPs which incorporate Qs like when did you actually change your mind on gay marriage.”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/26769

573

SI269

26817

EMAILID 26817 Looks like a bunch of Podesta voicemails helpfully transcribed by an assistant.

“Claire McCaskill: Give me a call back at your convenient on my cell or at home. Got some info about the state department IG. You guys should digest and figure out what if anything we can do.”

The State Department IG (Inspector General) was investigating Hillary Clinton’s email use and disclosure of classified information, including TOP SECRET/SAP to unauthorized persons, without security clearances such as IT staff or a team of lawyers. Giving inside information about the State Department IG could allow the Hillary staff to get ahead of the investigation and run an efficient coverup.

“Andrew Cuomo: I have an idea that I want to do here in NY that I think could work nicely for Hillary. It’s time sensitive.”

This was around 6 Oct 2015 14:20:03 so maybe someone will be able to figure out what A. Cuomo wanted to do to help out Hillary. It was time sensitive. Andrew Cuomo (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Cuomo) is the Democrat governor of the state of New York and the brother of lyin’ CNN’s anchor Chris Cuomo(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Cuomo) . No conflict of interest to see here.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/26817

574

SI270

26837

APPEARS George Soros IS directing the expenditure of campaign advertising funds?

“I think we have resolved the whole question. Soros is fine with Bing giving directly to c4’s and not the 527. Although, they do think that it provides a story that will be even more focused on him. Bing may split his money between media and field c4’s in order to show good faith that he is in it with all the other major funders jointly. If so he would probably give funds to WVWV who he likes and ACORN’s c4 to help with their match.”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/26837

575

SI271

26846

HRC IS KNOWINGLY AND COMPLICITY “DISTORTING DEMOCRACY” BY TAKING BIG MONEY

From:john.podesta@gmail.com
To: dschwerin@hillaryclinton.com
Date: 2016-02-09 20:30
Subject: REVISED DRAFT: Primary Night Remarks

“Somehow we should get more punch out of the fact that she knows how big $ can distort democracy.”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/26846

576

SI272

26907

*From:* Duvall, Amanda
*Statement from the Communications Director on Subpoena Issuance*

“The Select Committee on Benghazi today issued subpoenas for all >>> communications of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton related to >>> Libya and to the State Department for other individuals who have >>> information pertinent to the investigation. The Committee also has issued >>> preservation letters to internet firms informing them of their legal >>> obligation to protect all relevant documents.”

Philippe Reines wrote:
rather than going around and around on how to release the 55k, let’s just be for what’s happening and use this as the excuse.

Philippe Reines wrote:
We’re on with David. Yes they have everything, but they don’t believe they have everything. But no, they are not asking for all 55k. But nevertheless gives us an excuse.
HRC CAMPAIGN ACKNOWLEDGE THEY DIDN’T TURN OVER EVERY EMAIL

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/26907

577

SI273

26948

HRC INSIDERS ARE ALMOST CERTAIN HRC’S SERVER WAS HACKED AND THE EMAILS MIGHT BE RELEASED BEFORE THE ELECTION

EMAILID 26948

The email itself has no value but there is a pdf attachment titled: “Hillary Clinton’s emails and what to do about them”

“There is a very real risk that the system was broken into, possibly by Republican operatives (or China or some other country or organization). If this has happened and if there is anything that might appear problematic in those emails, whether or not it actually is, the relevant emails might be released to the press shortly before the election. Even if the system was not broken into, there is the threat that opp…

In addition, there are questions that any computer security expert will ask, such as was the system backed up regularly.”

The official line was always that nobody got into the server. So the private server arrangement was no big deal. No classified information was exposed (other than what Hillary exposed herself to a team of lawyers, IT specialists, aids and maybe a few janitors).

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/26948

578

SI274

27111

A health issue with Hillary Clinton’s head around 2015-09-26 . The date might allow to look for further information and try to track it down. John Podesta wrote this email to Jennifer Palmieri .

“subject:Any sense of whether and when she wants to talk?

How bad is her head?”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/27111

579

SI275

27197

HRC CAMPAIGN TRYING TO GET THEIR STORIES STRAIGHT ON WHY THERE ARE GAPS IN THE EMAILS… THEY DELETED THEM!

“From: Mandy Grunwald
Subject: ‘Huge gaps’ in Clinton emails: Chairman of House Benghazi Committee | New York Post

Do we have an answer for why there are no emails from the Oct. 8 trip to Libya?

http://nypost.com/2015/03/08/huge-gaps-in-clinton-emails-chairman-of-house-benghazi-committee/

Mandy Grunwald
Grunwald Communications”

https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/27197

580

SI276

27238

PODESTA AND MOOK OF HRC CAMPAIGN CONSPIRING TO FIX THE DATE OF THE CA PRIMARY TO HELP HRC WIN

Robert Mook wrote:
“FYI–Lehane called me about CA primary and I told him that the operating strategy is to keep blue states late (i.e. don’t move CA). He said he was at dinner with you and was under the impression that you wanted to move it earlier. He’s wondering how to proceed and I said I’d try to get us on the same page and go back with an answer. Are you ok with me saying that we both want CA to stay where it is?”

John Podesta wrote:
“Yes. That’s great.”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/27238

581

SI277

27648

2008 email discussion of Democrat Party operatives about the possibility of interfering with the 2008 Republican primary process. From Paul Begala :

CNN projects Sen. John McCain will win South Carolina primary – This is trouble.

Tom Matzzie responds:

Yes, we need to move with some tactics to try to stop him. Ideas? We should take another swing at the immigration angle. I think this is a crisis. We need to ring the alarm bell. But I’m not sure how we could affect the GOP primary? Earned media play on McCain and immigration. Robocalls to suppress his vote? Turnout evangelicals for Huck?

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/27648

582

SI278

28575

HRC CAMPAIGN DOESNT SELECT PEOPLE FOR POSITIONS BASED ON QUALIFICATIONS THEY SELECT BASED ON RACE. THESE ARE TOKEN APPOINTMENTS

“Cheryl Mills” wrote:
Here is Robby’s List of the top 10 or so positions:

Political Director – Hispanic Woman
12 positions:
4 POC (2 Black; 1 Asian; 1 Hispanic)
4 Women (assuming COO is a white woman)
6 White Men

33% diverse
33% women
50% white men”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/28575

583

SI279

28660

HRC CAMPAIGN PICKS ADMINISTRATION AND HIGH LEVEL POSITIONS BASED ON RACE AND RELIGION. ALSO HIRING SPECIFICALLY MUSLIM JUDGES AND ATTORNEYS TO BETTER MIRROR MIDDLE EASTERN LAW!

From: Bansal, Preeta D (NYC)
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2008 11:01 PM
To: Froman, Michael B
Cc: ‘Onek, Matthew’
Subject: Asian American Candidates, Muslim American Candidates

“Here are the compiled lists of Asian American and Muslim American candidates for top Administration jobs, sub-cabinet jobs, and outside boards/agencies/policy committees.

1) In the candidates for top jobs, I excluded those with some Arab American background but who are not Muslim (e.g., George Mitchell). Many Lebanese Americans, for example, are Christian. In the last list (of outside boards/commissions), most who are listed appear to be Muslim American, except that a handful (where noted) may be Arab American but of uncertain religion (esp. Christian).

2) There is only one candidate I thought was a viable one for a Secretary-level job among the Muslim Americans.

3) High-profile Muslim Americans tend to be the subject of a fair amount of blogger criticism, and so the individuals on this list would need to be ESPECIALLY carefully vetted. I suspect some of the people I list would not survive such a vet…”

WHY WOULDN’T THEY SURVIVE A VETTING? ARE THEY KNOWINGLY PRESENTING PEOPLE WITH CRIMINAL TIES OR TERRORIST TIES?

“DOJ list will be coming in the next two days. Judges and USAttorneys will still take about 10 days. Let me know if the latter are needed sooner.”

WHY SPECIFICALLY MUSLIM JUDGES AND ATTORNEYS? THE LAW IS BLIND TO RELIGION, UNLESS THEY ARE TRYING TO SHAPE IT INTO LAW THAT REFLECTS MIDDLE EASTERN LAW

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/28660

584

SI280

28923

Robert Gates, the sitting Secretary of Defense emailing John Podesta’s gmail from his secret email address in 2008. Robert Gates (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Gates) who served as the 22nd United States Secretary of Defense from 2006 to 2011, wrote this to John Podesta’s gmail address:

“Several items.
1. I will interview Michele Flournoy, Bob Hale and Jeh Johnson tomorrow. I support all three and will e-mail you a presumed thumbs up by midday. ..

2. Scott Gratian called Robert Rangel and told him he was doing all the personnel for DoD and that we should work with him. I just need confirmation whether that is true since this is the first time he has come up on the net on personnel.

3. I really must communicate with the political appointees/schedule C folks here by this Friday about their future. I have told Clapper, Donley and Vickers that they are likely to be asked to stay for some period of time — maybe up to a year — and told them to keep mum. All others are in the dark. ..

4. Once Flournoy, Hale, Johnson, Soule, etc. are named, they will no longer be able to serve on the transition because of the presumption problem on the Hill. You will need to think about the composition of the team at that point.

5. Finally, Senator Levin called me this morning and pointedly asked that names for Deputy and other senior jobs be run by the Armed Services staff director (Rick DeBobes) and Levin’s chief of staff (David Lyles) before final decisions are made.

That’s “all” for now
Thanks for the help.
Bob”

I think the sitting Secretary of Defense and John Podesta are discussing yoga emails here in coded language. If this was some official business, Gates could not have used an address ending in @att.net meaning an address that was registered with AT&T and not the Department of Defense. Right?

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/28923

585

SI281

29194

PODESTA AND SOROS MEETING WITH ATTACHMENTS

John Podesta and George Soros were having a meeting. As part of the preparation Soros staff is sending Podesta memos to read. The first memo is on Malaysia it is a 14 page pdf, so check the attachment of this email.

“Subject: Soros meeting

Hi John, sorry it was so difficult for us to talk. I have attached a memo on TPP and Malaysia, as it may come up when you see George and Alex. .. In a separate email I will send you George’s latest thinking on the migration crisis, which he is spending a lot of time on. His other big preoccupation these days is Ukraine. Both the migration crisis and Ukraine are part of his view of Europe as falling apart”

The Malaysia memo, the pdf attachment to this email has some items at the end which look like demands that George Soros wanted to extract from the administration. Things such as:

“Dissociate from Najib…soon. The administration should consider a plan to distance itself from Mr Najib. The open scandal around Najib has spiraled out of control and his position is unsustainable.

Demand Anwar’s release At a closed door meeting with Mr. Najib in Kuala Lumpur in November 2015, the President firmly requested the release of Mr. Anwar, on health grounds, for medical treatment in Washington. Najib has not complied.”

Someone who knows more about Malaysia and George Soros’s interests there could look into this. Why did Soros want to influence the political situation in that country in such a direct way?

https://wikileaks.o

Sanctimony, Inc., Victor Hanson [nc – re rigged elections]

Sanctimony, Inc.
October 26, 2016 10:20 am / Leave a Comment / Megan Ring
by Victor Davis Hanson // National Review
Time was, leftists complained of rigged elections, the media paid attention to dirty tricks, and conservatives cared more about results than rhetoric.
Donald Trump, in characteristically muddled and haphazard fashion, said he thought the election might end up “rigged” (if he lost). Therefore, he would not endorse the November 8 result if he found that fear confirmed — unless, of course, in Jacksonian fashion, he managed to win.
All hell broke loose, from both the Left and principled conservatives, that Trump’s allegations had somehow undermined the American electoral process itself.
Not likely.

Questioning the integrity of election votes was a national pastime in 1824 (“corrupt bargain”), 1876 (“compromise of 1877”), and again in 1960. Bitching over losing, of course, is not the same thing as armed insurrection in the fashion of 1860, when furor erupted over Lincoln’s election.
Any candidate, whether feeding conspiracies or out of genuine concern for electoral misconduct, can say whatever he or she wishes, without the deleterious national consequences that pundits decry. Bad sportsmanship and manners are not synonymous with constitutional subversion.
“Selected, not elected” was a Democratic talking point after the 2000 Bush victory.In a speech two years after that election, a now sanctimonious Hillary Clinton echoed those “selected” charges against the Bush presidency. But so what?
In 2004, the trope that Ohio was rigged and thus cost John Kerry the election was standard liberal boilerplate. An embittered Kerry was the sore loser that Trump will be if he comes up short. Kerry’s friend columnist Mike Barnicle was quoted years later of Kerry’s inability to accept legitimate defeat: “For a long period, after 2004, every time he even half fell asleep, all he saw was voting machines in the state of Ohio.”
Let us hope that Trump does not become as unhinged as Al Gore became — for years, the former vice president could not speak publicly without screaming in vein-bulging style, and seemed to be obsessed by George W. Bush in Carthago delenda est fashion.
Indeed, in the last week after the Trump blunderbuss declaration, an entire mini industry has emerged, chronicling prior examples of Democrats questioning election results or alleging past evidence of voting fraud.
It would, of course, have been wiser for Trump to worry out loud about localized corruption, rather than to suggest in conspiratorial fashion that a nationwide cabal was devoted to rigging the election. But then again, we have rarely seen anything like the recent disclosures of pathetic efforts at massaging the vote. Trump’s sin was one of magnitude, not of mischaracterizing the intent or culpability of his opponents: He is right that many wish to corrupt the voting, but hardly certain that in the key battlegrounds they are powerful enough to sway an entire state’s vote count.
Recently disgraced and resigned Democratic operatives, who were in the pay of the Democratic National Committee (and one of whom was a very frequent visitor to the Obama White House), boast on tape not only of disrupting Trump rallies by bought and staged violence but also of busing non-resident voters into Ohio to affect the vote count; they further brag that their dirty tricks are longstanding practice.
Is the charge of voting subversion confined to Trump?
It is now a standard Democratic talking point that Vladimir Putin is trying to rig/warp/undermine the election for Trump by turning over to WikiLeaks hacked DNC and Podesta e-mails. Hillary, at the recent Al Smith dinner, pointed to Trump’s supposed Putin connection by suggesting that Trump reads Russian. When voting fraud is an act of pride rather than criminality, something has gone terribly wrong.
Yet, contrary to Hillary’s debate assertions, there is still no concrete evidence identifying the Russians as the ultimate source of the WikiLeaks, even though they may well be the most likely culprit. And even if it were true, we still don’t know whether Putin is trying to help Trump or just hurt the U.S. in general — in accordance with his serial post-reset angry behavior at Obama (sanctimonious sermons to the Russians without projecting strength is a disastrous combination and has earned the present administration Russian contempt). If Hillary Clinton were to lose the election after an especially catastrophic disclosure from WikiLeaks, we could fairly assume that her supporters — or she herself in 2002 fashion — will cry foul and claim again the election was rigged.
Trump was not quite paranoid in his rants: We cannot remember a chairperson of either political party who was caught boasting to a presidential candidate’s team that she had caught electronic wind of debate questions in advance and would be willing to disclose that fact to the candidate, thus undermining the integrity of the entire debate system. In any other year, the clearly unethical conduct of Donna Brazile (“From time to time I get the questions in advance”) in undermining the debate process would have won far more media outrage than Donald Trump’s rhetorical excesses about rigged elections.
Moreover, the recent disclosures substantiate the perennial right-wing paranoia that the national media are not only biased but also in direct communications with liberal candidates in efforts to warp news stories for the purposes of altering the direction of the election. To take a minor example and an even more minor character: What was disturbing about the confessions of Politico’s Glen Thrush that he was seeking pre-approval from the Clinton campaign for his supposedly disinterested reporting was not just his own confession that he had become a “hack” (“Because I have become a hack I will send u the whole section that pertains to u”), but rather his own cognizance that becoming a hack was both wrong and therefore apparently should not be disclosed: “Please don’t share or tell anyone. I did this Tell me if I f***end up anything.” The media are not worried about their lack of ethics — they’re just afraid others will glimpse that they have none.
Finally, for years, readers of conservative magazines have read daily fare about voter fraud. John Fund has written an insightful book and many articles not about localized voting criminality but about stealing elections wholesale on a vast scale; he has analyzed in great detail the dangers of widely cited voter-registration and turnout abuse from Texas to Indiana. A national debate has erupted over voter IDs, with the Democratic position being that a voter should not have to show the same identification that he does when charging clothes at Target or Wal-Mart.
Yet when Trump — however crudely, conspiratorially, and inexactly — takes up this theme, what do some conservatives then do? They have in the past printed dire warnings of election theft, without worrying about the concrete consequences — and now they become hysterical when someone agrees with their wolf calls in light of clear evidence of media collusion and Democratic campaign roguery?
All sense of balance and perspective have vanished.
Just last week, we were treated to still more media and establishment contempt for Trump’s crude and obscene hot-mic banter — but strangely just as the “sex poodle” Al Gore and the hugger of reluctant women, plagiarist, and practitioner of racist banter Joe Biden hit the campaign trail to warn us of Trump’s low-rent character and to dream of punching him out. (“No, I wish we were in high school, and I could take him behind the gym,” Biden mused about Trump. “That’s what I wish.”) Imagine a former VP Dick Cheney boasting of a desire to fist-fight the Democratic nominee, or Reince Priebus bragging in e-mails to the Trump campaign that he had prior knowledge of debate questions, or Corey Lewandowsky boasting that he had hired thugs to disrupt Hillary’s campaign rallies. Because there are no such parallels, instead we get psychodramas about a Venezuelan beauty queen.
Inciting violence by the use of inflammatory language used to be something liberals publicly condemned. But now taking Trump out physically is apparently a progressive dream, as Robert De Niro (“I’d like to punch Trump in the face”) earlier had foreshadowed Biden’s dreams of physical assault. Meanwhile, liberals strain to find the right metaphor for Trump — Mussolini and Hitler being the most common — while some conservatives prefer brownshirts or Stalin.
All during this campaign, the NASCAR crowd has been lectured on the dangerous consequences of their ignorance by establishment plagiarists such as Fareed Zakaria, Maureen Dowd, and Doris Kearns Goodwin, by hollow men like John Podesta, sexual scoundrels such as Bill Clinton, and by racist slanderers like Harry Reid — with opportune finger-wagging from the ethically compromised Donna Brazile and fabulists like Brian Williams. Such shrill hypocrisy does not excuse Trump’s transgressions, but it does confirm a general picture that our intellectual and public elite play by different rules from others, and their sanctimoniousness should be ignored.
It also remains a curious artifact of this election that many conservatives are outraged far more by Trump’s obnoxiousness, crudity, and rhetorical excesses than they are by Hillary’s concrete record of premeditated criminality and habitual prevarication — especially given the likelihood that on illegal immigration, defense spending, Obamacare, abortion, the debt, taxes, and regulation, Trump’s published agenda is the far more conservative.

Apparently a vicious, insider liberal establishmentarian poses less threat to the republic that does a more conservative outsider fop

October 24, 2016

A Question on American History

Hillary Clinton keeps talking that all U.S. transfers of government have been peaceful.

Am I the only person who has ever heard of The American Civil War or aka The War of 1861 or did all of those teachers lie to me and Lincoln not assassinated????

I’m just sayin’.

October 21, 2016

Inaccurate Polls, by Joseph John, Capt USN ret USNA

Joseph R. John
To jrj@combatveteransforcongress.org
Today at 6:45 AM

The American Voters Are Being Misled by Inaccurate Polling

By Capt Joseph R. John, October 21, 2016

By clicking on the below listed link, you will be able to read an accurate explanation for why the FOX News polls have not been very reliable over the last year, and why both the Rasmussen and the LA Times/UCLA polls have been much more reliable during the same period. The polling process being employed by FOX should be updated to improve the reliable and accuracy of its polling.

http://ipatriot.com/fox-news-polls-biased-favor-hillary-clinton/

The below listed E-mail provides statistics from accurate data compiled on Social Media, that supporters the more reliable process outlined in the above iPatriot article. The below listed E-mail provides substantial popular support for Mr Trump and will contribute significantly toward verifying the reliability of weekly polls being taken by Rasmussen and the LA Times/UCLA. The below listed information and the details in the above link, can defuse the left of center liberal media establishment drum beat that Hillary lead in the polls has been as much as 11% points ahead of Mr Trump standing. Reporting those figures as accurate has been dishonest spin promoted by NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC, The New York Times, The Washington Post, and other very liberal media outlets that are heavily in support for Hillary Clinton. Unfortunately that misleading information has been also reported by the FOX News Network, because their polling results have not been accurate or reliable.

The corrupt media has not been an objective source of news, nor has it exposed the incompetence and failed policies of the Obama administration for the last 8 years, It has not been reliably reporting cold hard facts on both the Republican and Democrat primary campaign over the last year. A very few examples of its failure to honestly report facts are: the failure to report that Robert Creamer who had 300 meetings at the White House (47 directly with Obama) fomented violence at Trump rallies, the dangers posed to the US by the Iranian Nuclear Weapons Agreement, how the US Armed Forces have been hollowed out and degraded by Obama over the last 8 years, the lies & violations of Federal Law associated with the Illegal Benghazi Gun Running Operation that led to the death of 4 Americans, the lies Obama told to get Obama Care passed & its complete failure, Obama’s violations of US Federal Immigration Laws for 8 years, and so much more.

The left of center liberal media establishment that has been I n he tanks for Obama over the last 8 years, has now become an arm of the Clinton Presidential Campaign. The media has been minimizing and covering up Hillary’s criminal violation of the National Security of the United States, and that she should have been charged with, and has also been covering up that Hillary as Secretary of State approved the sale of 25% of the US’s uranium production to Vladimir Putin in negotiations by Bill Clinton.

The below information in the below listed E-mail, and the information revealed by clicking on the above listed link will provide positive detailed information that would support the accurate information that Mr Trump is in a very close and competitive race for the Presidency of the United States and that information would energize his supporters. This E-mail should be forwarded to as many voters as possible.

Copyright by Capt Joseph R. John. All Rights Reserved. The material can only posted on another Web site or distributed on the Internet by giving full credit to the author. It may not be published, broadcast, or rewritten without the permission from the author.

Joseph R. John, USNA ‘62

Capt USN(Ret)/Former FBI

Regional Chairman, Southern California, Veterans 4 Trump (Orange County, Imperial County, and San Diego County)

2307 Fenton Parkway, Suite 107-184

San Diego, CA 92108

Then I heard the voice of the Lord, saying, “Whom shall I send, and who will go for Us?” Then I said, “Here am I. Send me!”
-Isaiah 6:8

From: Timothy Wilson
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2016 11:53 AM
Subject: The Truth Is Out There

A Google Search revealed several sources which verified this.

Let’s take a look at the facts that the liberal / corporate media completely ignores or covers up.

FACT #1:

Trump has nearly three times the amount of followers on Facebook.

Trump: 12,174,358 likes.

Clinton: 4,385,959 likes.

Look what Trump’s live stream videos do when compared to Hillary’s.

Trump Live Stream Post – 21 hours ago: 135,000 likes, 18,167 shares, 1.5 million views

Clinton Live Stream Post – 25 hours ago: 9,000 likes, 0 shares, 121,000 views

That does not look good at all for her!

Fact #2:

Trump has 18.6 million twitter followers.

Hillary Clinton has only 6.1 million.

The best part is that most of Hillary’s are actually fake. According to the Washington Examiner, 41 percent of Hillary’s “followers” are not even real people. In contrast, The Daily Caller says that Trump’s followers are 90% real with 90% of them having a previous voting record.

Fact #3:

Trump averages 160k viewers per live stream.

Clinton averages 400 viewers per live stream.

Wow. That is bad. Trump also gets 5,000 percent more eyeballs focused on the screen than Clinton. Yep. She really is that boring to the folks.

Fact #4:

Instagram.

Trump has 6.2 million followers.

Clinton has 800,000 followers.

Instagram is a platform with mostly all pictures and not much substance – exactly what Hillary supporters love. And still she does very poorly in this medium.

Fact #5:

On Reddit.

Trump: 297,696 subscribers

Clinton: 21,429 subscribers

But on Hillary for Prison: She gets 255,228 subscribers.

Trump has more subscribers than Clinton on every major social media outlet but what is even funnier is that there are nearly 3 times as many people subscribed to “Hillary for Prison” than there are subscribed to the Clinton page.

The best part is that the DNC’s leaked emails from WikiLeaks have proven that Clinton pays people to support her online. Trump supporters on the other hand willingly actually like and follow him on Social media.

Trump actually has the support of the people. He is going to win this election come November no matter what the mainstream media would like you to believe.

Right now, every single patriot needs to share this article with friends and relatives.

We need to fight these rigged polls that seem to come out every day.

Hillary Clinton has a big bag of tricks and is trying to hoodwink the American public into voting for her.

Let’s show America the truth and let her know we aren’t a “basket of deplorables.”

October 19, 2016

Communist Party USA endorses HRC

To jrj@combatveteransforcongress.org
Today at 6:13 AM

In the below listed article, the Communist Party USA endorsed Hillary Clinton and is pushing for a landslide victory over Donald Trump The Communist Party USA has joined with the previous support Hillary received from the Muslim Brotherhood, Black Lives Matter, and Progressives.

The Double Standard of Justice Imposed On The US Military:

On October 18th, General James Cartwright, USMC (Ret), former Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, accepted “full responsibility” for making false statements to the FBI in connection with the unauthorized disclosure of classified information to two reporters, in violation of the National Security Laws of the US. He is facing a fine, and as many as six months in prison, for making classified information accessible without authorization.

While Hillary Clinton received a pass from the Director of the FBI and the Attorney General of the US for illegally transmitting over 2000 Secret, Top Secret, and Top Secret SCI Compartmented messages, on the unclassified server in her residence, in violation of the National Security Laws of the United States.

In addition Hillary got a pass for illegally destroying over 30,000 messages that were the property of the US State Department & the American people, in violation of the National Security Laws of the United States.

In addition Under Secretary of State Patrick Kennedy got a pass from the FBI for applying pressure on subordinates to downgrade the classification of E-mails transmitted on Hillary’s unclassified server, and also for a bribery attempt for trying to convince an FBI Agent to alter the classification code of an E-mail, in a “quid pro quo” offer, with the offer of a payoff of receiving additional FBI billets in Middle East Embassies and Missions.

Joseph R. John, USNA ‘62

Capt USN(Ret)/Fromer FBI

Chairman, Combat Veterans For Congress PAC

2307 Fenton Parkway, Suite 107-184

San Diego, CA 92108

http://www.CombatVeteransForCongress.org

https://www.facebook.com/combatveteransforcongress?ref=hl

Then I heard the voice of the Lord, saying, “Whom shall I send, and who will go for Us?” Then I said, “Here am I. Send me!”
-Isaiah 6:8

From: Fr Richard Kim [mailto:frkim@kimgrams.org]
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 4:32 AM
To: Fr Richard Kim
Subject: COMMUNIST PARTY USA PUSHES LANDSLIDE FOR HILLARY

http://www.wnd.com/2016/10/communist-party-usa-pushes-landslide-for-hillary/

Communist Party USA pushes landslide for Hillary

Calls on ‘comrades on the ground’ to defeat Trump resoundingly

Published: 16 hours ago

220

WASHINGTON – Hillary Clinton is getting a boost in her bid for the presidency from an enthusiastic group she doesn’t mention in campaign speeches – the Communist Party USA (CPUSA).

Long gone are the days when the party ran its own candidates for president and vice president. In 2016, it’s all in for the Democrats and Clinton.

The party is not just pushing for a win, though, it’s looking for a landslide over Donald Trump that will permit the Democrats to take the House and Senate, too, according to the latest reports at the CPUSA website.

“The polls are frightening in light of the white supremacist forces in top leadership of the Trump campaign,” says one report on the site. “How to move voters? The biggest challenge is making voters aware of where the candidates stand on issues that affect their lives like jobs, wages, Social Security, pay equity, immigration reform, voting rights, student debt, indeed, all democratic rights at stake, and then turning out a massive vote. Now is the time to put everything we’ve got into this election struggle in a way that carries on after it’s over.”

The report added: “It will be important to hear from the comrades on the ground talking to voters. Clearly if Trump and the Republicans are to be defeated, it will take a continued massive education effort and a real explosion of voter turnout.”

The mask is off! Get October’s stunning pre-election Whistleblower issue, “HILLARY’S ULTIMATE WEAPON: America’s biased and abusive news media finally abandon all pretense of fairness”

According to the CPUSA, “Trump represents a new type of fascist danger.”

“A landslide unity vote is necessary to resoundingly repudiate Donald Trump and the alt right,” says the CPUSA report. “It is needed to repudiate sexism and elect the first woman president. It is a mistake to assume the outcome. Who knows what the October surprise and other dirty tricks can bring?”

The CPUSA doesn’t want any third-party voting, either, as WND has reported in the past. It is calling for unity around Clinton.

A landslide will heal the nation,” the party proclaims. “In a very close election, the votes for Johnson and Jill Stein could throw the election to Donald Trump. The argument for a landslide unity vote could convince some of those to do the right thing.”

The full-throated backing of Clinton began as soon as it became clear Bernie Sanders would not be the nominee of the Democratic Party, as WND reported after the convention. Since then, the CPUSA has found few if any issues on which it disagrees with the Democratic nominee.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2016/10/communist-party-usa-pushes-landslide-for-hillary/#CZX1yDUqwoKkJxYX.99

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.